this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024

827 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19240 readers

2978 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

827

Trump’s Latest Scheme to Beat Harris May Have Crossed Legal Lines (newrepublic.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/politics

231 comments fedilink hide all child comments

He may not be in office, but Donald Trump has been speaking with the powers that be about Israel’s war on Gaza—but it’s not in an effort to end the genocide.

Instead, Trump has allegedly been talking with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to avert a cease-fire deal, fearing that doing so could help Vice President Kamala Harris win in November, according to PBS.

“The reporting is that former President Trump is on the phone with the Prime Minister of Israel, urging him not to cut a deal right now, because it’s believed that would help the Harris campaign,” said PBS’s Judy Woodruff Monday night. “So, I don’t know where—who knows whether that will come about or not, but I have to think that the Harris campaign would like for President Biden to do what presidents do, and that’s to work on that one.”

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 346 points 4 months ago (31 children)

Everyone who says "They're both equally bad. I refuse to vote for either candidate because they both support genocide" can shut the fuck up now.

[–] kescusay 122 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I strongly suspect most of the people pushing that particular line aren't eligible to vote... in American elections, that is.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I don't, I know what it was like to be an optimistic young adult. I understand the allure of holding strong to an ethical code while others' compromises seem to make the progress all too slow.

The truth is that this shit takes time and requires a lot of pressure - and that's a fucking bitter pill to swallow.

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] Warl0k3 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Some of them no doubt, a lot of them are younger voters that are just sick of their country never having been sliding down into more and more blatant evil for their entire lives.

[–] Dramaking37 25 points 4 months ago

Or ones who don't understand propaganda when they see it

[–] elliot_crane 55 points 4 months ago

They could have also shut the fuck up at any point previous, but we’ll accept “now” as well.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 months ago

THANK YOU. Jesus fucking Christ thank you. I'm so sick of this shit

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago (2 children)

What are you talking about? My close friend from Texas Oblast who owns a barbecuing shop says this all the time!

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (27 replies)

[–] khan_shot_1st 196 points 4 months ago (12 children)

I'm really tired of Trump not being in prison.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I’m really tired of Trump not being in prison.

Yes, but I'm more tired of realizing he will never be in prison. There's not a judge in the country that seems willing to do more than make him fork over a little of his pocket lint. And if it's ever more than that, it's still going to be an ankle bracelet and a 1% lifestyle.

One justice system for the rich and powerful, another for the rest of us.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago

It would be great if nature took its course because the legal system never fucking will.

load more comments (10 replies)

[–] [email protected] 157 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I think the last Republican presidential candidate to sabotage peace talks to help his own campaign was Richard Nixon in the Vietnam War, so Trump is just continuing their tradition of killing innocents for personal gain.

[–] [email protected] 106 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Reagan sabotaged the Iran hostages deal

So it is rumored

And those are only the ones we know of; dealing in death is pretty standard fare for people high up in Washington

[–] [email protected] 65 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's not rumors anymore. It's a settled fact.

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a43368900/reagan-iran-hostages/

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] cabron_offsets 30 points 4 months ago

Bruh. Reagan.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please 111 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Throwback to Reagan’s team intentionally sabotaging negotiations for the Iran hostage crisis, so it would make Jimmy Carter look bad right before the election.

[–] WhatYouNeed 37 points 4 months ago

With Roger fucken Stone lurking in the background in both situations.

[–] Gumbyyy 37 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Also Nixon sabotaging the Vietnam peace talks.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] JusticeForPorygon 86 points 4 months ago

[–] [email protected] 74 points 4 months ago (4 children)

They didn't jail Nixon or that shitbag kissenger for the same shit, doubt anything will be done about this. Hell, both of those asshats got to live out their years rubbing elbows and "advising" the political elite of both parties.

[–] phoneymouse 26 points 4 months ago

Nor Reagan

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning 74 points 4 months ago (86 children)

The "genocide Joe" crowd is deafeningly silent on this development, i see. How surprising.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Dachau Donald? Treblinka Trump?

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (85 replies)

[–] [email protected] 72 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Didn't Nixon do the same thing with the Vietnam war?

[–] [email protected] 80 points 4 months ago

And Regan with Iran hostages. It's almost like Republicans always pull this shit and never get in trouble for it...

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 69 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Woohoo maybe this time there will be consequences since he is not president and it can't be an official act ...

[–] WhatsHerBucket 41 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How has that worked out so far?

[–] APassenger 26 points 4 months ago

Let's find out in 5 years.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] barsquid 61 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wow, if only there was something we could do about people crossing legal lines. Alas, we have tried nothing and are out of ideas.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] FlowVoid 55 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

The Logan Act was passed in 1799. A grand total of two people were charged with violating it, and none were convicted.

Those fun facts are never going to change. Prosecutors should find something else to charge Trump with, it won't be hard.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We can always change the traditions

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 months ago (9 children)

How about the media stop using caveats like "may have" when shit is entirely 100% clear.

There are laws on the books regarding things like this. There is no may have. It's cut and fucking dried.

load more comments (9 replies)

[–] julysfire 48 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There has been no consequences to his actions so of course he is going to do whatever he wants.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

He's got what, 34 federal crime convictions?

He's still running around and the media is still treating him like some random dude running for president, oh look what crazy don said seven times today!

Shits ridiculous

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't be the first time he has 'crossed legal lines'.

However, wouldn't it be great if it was the last time?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Netanyahu revealing which part of the US he's really an "ally" of. Maybe stop giving blank checks to a foreign power destabilizing your country ~~while you only hand out loans and debt to Ukraine~~?

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] Fedizen 40 points 4 months ago

nail him for treason

[–] Etterra 38 points 4 months ago

I'll believe it when he's in jail. This orange turd is practically made of as slipperonium.

[–] A_Random_Idiot 38 points 4 months ago (2 children)

and nothing will happen, like every other time he "crossed legal lines"

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trump could punt a baby across a field and nothing would happen.

[–] rsuri 22 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Supreme court: "To ensure that babies are put in their place, former presidents must enjoy total infant punting immunity."

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

“I did encourage him to get this over with. You want to get it over with fast. Have victory, get your victory, and get it over with. It has to stop, the killing has to stop,” Trump said at a New Jersey press conference on Thursday, referring to their meeting at Mar-a-Lago last month. But he also criticized cease-fire demands.

In other words Trump wants to have a quick genocide. That is the only way to stop the killing, without having a ceasefire. Even Biden was a hell of a lot better then this.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

oh the old reagan october surprise countermeasure.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Alternate title: “Donald Trump DEFINITELY broke the law. You won’t BELIEVE what happened next!”

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments