this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
892 points (96.9% liked)

US Authoritarianism

727 readers
83 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eran_morad 124 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I don’t know, it seems pretty simple nowadays. Are you a cunt who gives a shit about whether dudes want to bang dudes or dress like chicks? Do you wish to oppress brown or black people, like on purpose, in an exertive manner? Are you trying to subjugate women? Do you long for a country in which the rule of law is taken directly from fairy tales? Are you trying to institutionally establish a single in-group and several out-groups? You’re a fucking fascist, you deserve to have your shit kicked in.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 37 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They explain all these away as not that bad, or not what they want. Some examples:

Are you a cunt who gives a shit about whether dudes want to bang dudes or dress like chicks?

Conservative: No, I am for traditional gender roles and family values

Do you wish to oppress brown or black people, like on purpose, in an exertive manner?

Conservative: No, I just think that people should stay with their own kind.

Are you trying to subjugate women?

Conservative: No, I am for traditional gender roles and family values

Do you long for a country in which the rule of law is taken directly from fairy tales?

Conservatives: The US is a christian nation which means our laws should be based on the Bible

They're going to weasel out of it, not just to stop discussion but also because it makes them feel bad that this is the outcome of their politics.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Have you seen this YouTube video of some black teenagers robbing a Guche bag store? Did you not learn about the immigrants with leprosy? Have you seen what they're posting on Nextdoor?!! Drag queens are invading libraries and trying to turn these kindergartners gay, and this based traditional father isn't going to take it anymore.

They spit on our veterans! They want to have sex with dogs! They are becoming radicalized by Shari Law and turning the big cities into No Go Zones with their Ground Zero Mosques! They are PERSECUTING CHRISTIANS LIKE IN THE BIBLE!

I saw it on Newsmax. They're the only ones reporting on what's in the vaccines.

Why aren't you taking this seriously? Is it because of TikTok? Have the Chinese made you Woke?

[–] splonglo 14 points 3 months ago

That's pretty on point. A lot of normal-brained people can't comprehend the mind of the rightoid, but this is pitch-perfect.

[–] Burn_The_Right 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Man... I am 69% sure this is top-shelf trolling to illustrate the evils of conservatism. But, I am genuinely not sure. If this is a troll, it's very well done.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Check his post history. He is indeed being sarcastic. Sadly not all of his sarcasm gets interpreted as such.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil 12 points 3 months ago

you deserve to have your shit kicked in.

But you won't, because you're ensconced behind an increasingly large and heavily armed mob of cops

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Beautiful 👏

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Excellent description. Saved for reference.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I’ve never understood the label. I’ve had to explain on a few occasions that no, you’re not trying to maintain traditional values. You’re just authoritarian.

[–] undergroundoverground 43 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Authoritarianism is the traditional value they're trying to maintain

[–] unreasonabro 18 points 3 months ago

it's the traditional conservative value. it's what they're trying to conserve, the time when they're the boss. all the rest is bullshit, every word. If they actually cared about you they'd listen to you

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Speaking of traditional values, I still want to know what Southern Pride is if it isn't glorifying the Confederacy.

[–] cmbabul 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

So am a southerner, and have relocated, southern pride as in pride in the food, music, language/dialect, and culture all of which is heavily influenced by black people is very different than being one of the assholes flying a confederate flag and claiming the south will rise again.

I should add that I grew up in the 90s and witnessed the rise of black culture to the American mainstream so i probably view my enjoyment of southern things differently than someone 20 years older

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] pyre 58 points 3 months ago (2 children)

that's because fascism is not like other political views. it doesn't come from thinkers, economists, sociologists or philosophers. it comes from maniacs doing maniacal shit. there is no "theory" to read on fascism. which is why the best academic text you find on it comes from its critics.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago (3 children)

People don't recognise fascism when it's in front of their faces.

  • Huge military budget

  • weaponized, authoritarian police force with little oversight.

  • Nationalist habits like pledging allegiance regularly when young and national anthems when together.

  • a strong belief that they are the best nation on earth, often backed with religious certainly.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] positiveWHAT 11 points 3 months ago

A bit? Exactly like Russia. They're at the full blown invading neighbors stage.

[–] postmateDumbass 8 points 3 months ago

Declaring war on inantimate objects/conditions

[–] positiveWHAT 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

REJECTION OF PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY AS A SHAM AND A FRAUD
After socialism, Fascism trains its guns on the whole block of democratic ideologies, and rejects both their premises and their practical applications and implements. Fascism denies that numbers, as such, can be the determining factor in human society; it denies the right of numbers to govern by means of periodical consultations; it asserts the irremediable and fertile and beneficent inequality of men who cannot be leveled by any such mechanical and extrinsic device as universal suffrage. Democratic regimes may be described as those under which the people are, from time to time, deluded into the belief that they exercise sovereignty, while all the time real sovereignty resides in and is exercised by other and sometimes irresponsible and secret forces. Democracy is a kingless regime infested by many kings who are sometimes more exclusive, tyrannical, and destructive than one, even if he be a tyrant.

From Benito Mussolini on Fascist doctrine

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nifty 12 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Ummm many fascists are disguised as intellectuals whose sophistry is only revealed by challenging their assumptions. There were a number of such people who came to rise in Nazi Germany and afterwards, and there are many who are their contemporaries

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Conservatism is a distinct political ideology that basically says not all change is for the better, nothing more--it's in the name: conserve. This is a separate concept from authoritarianism, which is all about how power flows. It's possible to be conservative and liberal at the same time if society is losing its liberal values.

US republicans are fascists through and through that wear a disguise of conservatism on select issues to convince people to relinquish their political power so that they can do whatever they want.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Sure, it's theoretically possible, but I've never met a conservative anywhere who actually wants to conserve what they have today. In practice, they all want to go back to the past, and most prefer some kind of fictional 1960s past.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

That’s the tricky part about conservatism. If their values never change, they are eventually left behind by progress and they become reactionaries. Unfortunately, people just keep accepting their use of the label “conservative” when it stopped fitting them decades ago, which is a convenient cover for the more reprehensible ones.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

Conservatism is a distinct political ideology that basically says not all change is for the better, nothing more

Based on what? Conservatism's roots go back to royalists after the French Revolution. Conservatives were the American colonists who objected to the war of independence calling it treason against the crown. It's not about change in a general way, it's about resisting democratic movements and preserving autocratic rule.

It's possible to be conservative and liberal at the same time

Liberalism is an offshoot of Conservatism that favors empowerment of the economic elite and institutions over kings and politicians. It's economic totalitarianism instead of political totalitarianism. These become indistinguishable when the economic elite capture the body politic.

US republicans are fascists through and through that wear a disguise of conservatism

This is backwards. The disguise is the thing that turns conservatism info fascism. It's the dressing up of conservative totalitarianism with nationalism, religious fundamentalism, racism, and other forms of identitarianism.

[–] buzz86us 48 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I like the idea of conservatism, but not the way it is executed.. Like why aren't these people for conservation of the environment, or actually financially conservative? All I'm noticing is greed, and corporate corruption.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001 72 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because by "conserve" they mean conserve the status quo.

Rich people stay rich poor people stay poor and anyone who tries to change that is a commie.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Rich people *get even richer and poor people *become even more poor.

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 11 points 3 months ago

The status quo can include trends, it doesn't necessarily mean a static state. "If the status quo is me getting [richer, more powerful, more control], then that's the one I want."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It seems useful to note that the EPA was signed into law by Nixon. We have fallen a long way since Reagan took office.

[–] Burn_The_Right 20 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The EPA was the idea of the progressives who seemed to have some momentum toward eventually achieving it. The conservatives (and their polluting corporate benefactors) were threatened by it. So, Nixon co-opted it while conservatives were still in power with the purpose of making sure it was ineffective. They achieved that.

You'll notice that when conservatives have power, they castrate the EPA and make sure it does not affect any of their benefactors. The Dem neo-liberals usually bend a little toward the progressives and will re-instate some of the EPA's power when the Dems are in charge, but it's never enough to undo whatever damage the last GOP administration did. This is because neo-liberals are conservatives. (They aren't as conservative as Republicans, but they are conservative by every international standard.)

Do not give credit to Nixon for the EPA. Like everything else ever done by a conservative, it was an act of self-serving deception. Nothing good in all of human history has ever come from conservatism. Nothing at all.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UnaSolaEstrellaLibre 9 points 3 months ago

They only thing they want to conserve is their capital/social status.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon 32 points 3 months ago

I see the lightbulb flickering!

[–] Sam_Bass 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Basically admitting that mainstream conservatism is indistinguishible from fascism.

[–] Maggoty 14 points 3 months ago (17 children)

It isn't, he's just trying to pull mainstream conservatives in to defend him. The far right has been very successful at getting normal conservatives to cover for them over the last 50 years. The actual ideas of fiscal and social conservatism are only partially aligned with fascism. The far bigger problem with regards to sliding into fascism is America's pro corporate stance.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

"Fiscal conservatism" has always been a straw man though. Literally nobody holds the policy that government should be reckless or wasteful. All fiscal conservatism does is promote one vision of fiscal responsibility, linguistically represented as some ideal.

And of course, social conservatism is just very thinly veiled hate politics.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago

Assuming the post was made in earnest - the poor guy is so close to getting it. Just let yourself start with your last sentence buddy, and think out from there.

[–] nifty 17 points 3 months ago

I hate the name of the community is US Authoritarianism when there’s so much fascist rise in EU

And for extra lols the dude in the meme should be asked what he thinks are “normal” right wing policies

[–] niktemadur 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What a dense, stupid motherfucker. Smacked in the face by a sledgehammer of truth that screams at him at full volume, and STILL he cannot grasp the damn thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GraniteM 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[–] Amadou_WhatIWant 15 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Look, conservatives suck but theyre not fascists. Calling everybody to the right of you fascist waters down the meaning of the word.

Heres a good take by Umberto Eco on what makes fascism distinct from other political movements: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/umberto-eco-ur-fascism

[–] madcaesar 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's hard because, yes you are right, but when can you start calling somone a fascist? Do you have have to wait for them to actually start rounding you up and putting you in prison, or can you point it out early in order to avoid the complete fascist takeover?

I guess my point is that, once a group is actually fully fascist, you will no longer be allowed to call them that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] just_another_person 12 points 3 months ago

Fascism is a movement led by a cult of personality with no clear direction, but get people to follow with maniacal views and populist energy against a false premise of a target in an "Us V Them" ideology.

Example: "They stand for everything we don't stand for. Also, they told me you guys look like dorks!"

[–] disguy_ovahea 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

“Trying to define fascism is like trying to nail jelly to the wall."

-Ian Kershaw

But yes, Christian Nationalism, oppressive legislation on civil liberties, exploitative economic systems designed to further widen wealth inequality, and support for militant police conduct are all symptoms of fascism.

[–] barsquid 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Are you willing to vote for an obvious criminal who commits election fraud, commits insurrections, extorts foreign governments, and sells top secret documents to adversarial nations? Then you are a fascist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

At least here in the US an admitted fascist won the Republican primary, so anyone who is willing to label themselves a Republican should also be perfectly fine with being labeled a fascist.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›