this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
426 points (95.5% liked)

World News

39039 readers
3630 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am so tired of the whole "cool pope" thing with Francis. It's 100% PR.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alterforlett 192 points 7 months ago (2 children)

And I think an organisation covering for pedophiles and murdering kids in their schools have no moral high ground and it is definitely unfit to lecture anyone on human dignity.

Eat a bag of dicks Francis

[–] AtariDump 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

Exactly. There people are a threat, not role models.

[–] logicbomb 75 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The Vatican said Pope Francis had approved the document, which also reaffirms its condemnation of surrogacy, saying the practice represents “a grave violation of the dignity of the woman and the child”.

“A child is always a gift and never the basis of a commercial contract,” the document says. “Every human life, beginning with that of the unborn child in its mother’s womb, cannot be suppressed, nor become an object of commodity.”

The ethical problems with surrogacy are real, but they're not about the child. They're about income inequality and putting adult women through a physically traumatic, dangerous, and possibly life-changing experience for money. If we were able to use artificial wombs for "surrogacy" (I know, it's technically not the same thing), I think people would see it as nothing but a new type of fertility medicine.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My cousin did it because she wanted to help someone have a child. She didn’t do it for the money. When it’s a financial transaction, I see the issue.

[–] FlyingSquid 39 points 7 months ago (11 children)

It also helps LBGT couples who can't have children get them. I don't see an issue even if there is money involved if it is clearly not coerced.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The issue is ensuring its clearly not coerced, which is effectively impossible in practice. Unfortunately it's one of those things where once you allow people to be paid for it, it's gets really, really dark, really, really quickly.

[–] FlyingSquid 12 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I don't think it's impossible at all. If the surrogate knows the person or people who want the child personally, it's almost certainly not coerced even if money changes hands.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Exactly. My cousin liked being pregnant but they already had five kids. Yes; she was paid but the money was token. It paid for medical care, food, etc. to her it was about helping someone.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner 50 points 7 months ago (2 children)

How about you work on your age-of-concent-fluidity problems first.

[–] mightyfoolish 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Then there's spreading HIV in Africa (and other parts of the world) by preaching against using condoms. How many millions have died of AIDS because the Catholic church told them or their partner not to wear a condom?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dkarma 45 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The Vatican is still covering up little boy rape, right?

[–] crypticthree 23 points 7 months ago

They're definitely covering for little girl rape too

[–] [email protected] 38 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I say diddling kids is a threat to human dignity.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

That's where you and the pope will just have to agree to disagree.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago

idk, seems like forced birth and pedophilia are bigger threats to the dignity of the woman and the child than surrogacy

[–] samus12345 32 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The Vatican has described the belief in gender fluidity as “a concession to the age-old temptation to make oneself God”

Better update the bible in English to refer to god as "they" instead of always using male pronouns, then.

[–] kromem 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (22 children)

I mean, no update needed:

Then God said, “Let us make humans in our image, according to our likeness, and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over the cattle and over all the wild animals of the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth.”

So God created humans in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.

  • Genesis 1:26-27

This passage uses a plural for God and refers to the image of God as male and female (likely a remnant of when it was a divine couple before the reforms, but still).

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago

Let this be a reminder to you that organized religion only accepts social progress when they get dragged to do it under risk of becoming irrelevant. This Pope's previous winks to the LGBT community were the bare minimum that the Catholic Church has to do in order to not to continue losing followers (and their wallets) in some countries such as Spain and Ireland. The moment a much less mainstream concept, such as gender fluidity, gets brought into the table, it's free game for them again.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago

Aaaaand…. Human dignity calls the Vatican archaic and obsolete.

[–] SpiceDealer 23 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Wouldn't depriving someone of their right to their preferred identity be considered a threat to human dignity?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] taanegl 23 points 7 months ago

All top level religious leaders are generally awful. Especially if it's Abrahamic.

If you think Buddhists are exempt, read about the Tibetan Buddhist monarchies.

Also, theocracy needs to die.

[–] Ultraviolet 23 points 7 months ago

Frank, if you want to find threats to human dignity, look at your child molesting priests and your bishops covering for them. Until then, you're in no place to judge.

[–] Veraxus 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, recknognizing that human beings come in many different forms is the "threat to human dignity", and definitely not the practice of trying to aggressively (even violently) shoehorn others into neat, convenient categories. 🙄

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago

Yes, because living your desires as your true self is no way to find dignity. And surrogacy?! Like…what.

[–] Okokimup 19 points 7 months ago

Ah yes, it is uniquely dignified to hate your body and feel like an alien inside it.

[–] Burn_The_Right 19 points 7 months ago

The only threat to human dignity here is child-rapists being considered the experts on morality.

Conservatism is a vile plague and religion a tool of conservatism. There is no greater threat to humanity than conservative religious people.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

Letting people live the life they chose for themselves: unacceptable!

Forcing them to be unhappy and never find peace with themselves: just as god intended.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (7 children)

there's the catholic church that I knew and hated.

I wonder why multiple adults beating the shit out of 6 year old me with yardsticks wasn't a threat to human dignity.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Phegan 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] Son_of_dad 20 points 7 months ago (3 children)

He never was, it was all PR to deflect from the child molesting

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

He never was. He's just a Pope John Paul II who hasn't had a photoshoot with a brutal dictator yet.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

Agreed. Being slightly less of an asshole than one”s predecessor is definitely not the same as being “cool”.

[–] DrSleepless 14 points 7 months ago

Fuck the vatican

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Boo!

Boo, again I say!

It makes life so much harder for Trans living in parts of the world where Catholicism is still relevant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Get Fucked Pedo Leader!!!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

LOL, every single surrogate I've ever met personally, with the exception of one, has been a staunch Christian.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass 10 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Human dignity has been a nonarguement for 100,000 years

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

And thr vatican can fuck right off with their outdated world view.

Wonder why they’re losing so many followers

[–] AutistoMephisto 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's important to note that all the times he's been the "cool pope" he's prefaced all his statements with the phrase "ex cathedra", which means he's speaking as himself, not "the Pope". Because anything he says as "the Pope" is the official church position.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cosmicomical 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

There are a couple of institutions that keep trying to bring us back to the middle ages. I suggest we get rid of them for good before they declare the next holy crusade. Dear Pope, you suck!

load more comments
view more: next ›