May they all fall off a ladder while trying to hang a photo of the family who doesn't visit them anymore and then die slowly of dehydration on the floor with a broken pelvis.
Quit fucking with people's healthcare!
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
507 points (98.8% liked)
politics
19240 readers
2978 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
But there are profits to be made? The suffering is a feature if you're sociopathic.
and if we manage to keep trump out of the white house this year, they'll be back with some new demon in four. there's really only one way to deal with these heartless bastards.
More Republican death panels
It's always projection with Republicans...
It is grotesque. Vile, really. Fucking morbid.
It's less of a panel and more of a rubber stamp
Has privatizing ever worked out in the favor of the general public?
Also, I still feel like republicans are an existential threat. We should treat them as such, and not like "oh well it's just a difference of opinion and if they vote to kill me I guess that's fine."
Has privatizing ever worked out in the favor of the general public?
Depends on your definition. To a very large extent so much of the government is. Your city government isn't developing their own OS or fabricating their own metal parts.
Less pedantically I think you mean "has there been a role that was traditionally done by civil servants that was handed over to private sector and things got better as a whole?". It is a good question the only thing I can think of is some local government maintenance stuff is done that way. My city for example and our neighbor has the same night contractor for emergency repairs. I have worked with them a few times and they do alright, most of them are semi-retired.
Has privatizing ever worked out in the favor of the general public?
Nope. Never.
Healthcare? Probably not. Privitization got us to it current CPU and GPUs though. Price gouging aside, they are quite the spectacle of tech.
So something I've been wondering about lately, on one hand capitalism coincides with most modern advancements, but is that a case of cause or just a case of happening to be around at the same time? Especially when capitalism is being propped up by a lot of what is essentially targeted socialism these days.
Marx once thought that capitalism was needed for industrialization before transitioning to the next stage of human development (socialism), but I think he changed his opinion later.
I personally think there would be much more innovation in a more socialist society with UBI or UBS (universal basic services) because people should generally have more time to get educated and work on risky ideas instead of working on assembly lines for 60+ hours/week just to take care of their families.
You are only wondering that because you don't spend all day dealing with government contracts. It is night and day how slow government can be to adapt. I will name my next ulcer "government". Work so fucking hard on some of them just trying to inch them forward I want to cry. And no it is not just the US. It is freaken everywhere.
I personally think the free market works best and is best when it is has strict boundaries to play in.
When I came to my employer we made effectively every penny from government contracts. I was one of the people brought on so we could expand into private sector. That was right when the virus happened. In 3 years our private sector stuff hardly even resembles the government stuff internally, same basic functionality. One is advancing and the other is stuck in the early 90s.
Never stop asking those questions.
Was there a point where computer hardware was nationalized? A quick search made it look like it was never a government run monopoly. It was universities and then private
The sad thing here is that the Democrats will let them. Because they still think they get bonus points for playing the game by the rules only they follow.
Right now, the GOP nominee-presumptive is a piece of trash rapist, an Insurrectionist asshole who got hundreds of thousands of Americans dead. Man who is facing over 90 felony indictments, many of which are related to keeping (and let’s be honest, selling,) extremely sensitive materials.
Yet this asshole still walks free because to put him where he belongs would be political.
In case you’re wondering, this is why we’re fucked.
load more comments
(7 replies)
Well... looks like a lot more people are going to be working until their 80s so they'll have health insurance.
See that’s actually all wrong. We’re going to need fewer people working with increasing automation. We’re just going to have an “unfortunate” situation where people who cannot work ALSO cannot afford to stay alive.
We’ll have 80 year olds that just die and gosh if there was only something we could of done to save them. Tots and pears.
They will be "working" as Walmart greeters amongst other demeaning jobs.
They’ve been planning this for 40 years
So the boomers who have been holding back progress on healthcare will soon be stuck in the same boat as everyone else? They will no longer be able to say "got mine" before "fuck you"?
Maybe we'll get something that works for everyone out of the backlash, instead of something that only helps boomers.
Does not change anything for people currently on Medicare or people who don't just take the default option when given a choice.
So it just makes things worse for everyone younger than a boomer?
That tracks.
Medicare advantage is some bullshit I do not understand why people sign up for it, I guess it’s great if you never have to use it.
A lot of the elderly don't realize they've signed up for medicare advantage.
I worked for a drug company giving free money to patients who had insurance but still couldn't afford the drug (that's more profitable than charging a sane price in the first place).
It was routine to hear elderly patients saying the insurance told them they were re-signing up for medicare + a medicare supplemental when they'd been switched to a medicare advantage plan with a deductible and a lower coverage percentage.
That is scary AF!!
Yep. If you live in the US and have elderly family members, it's important to be aware of and involved in their healthcare/insurance stuff. Siphoning off the life savings of dying boomers is BIG business.
They sign up for it because the advertising is insidious. My family member signed up for it because it used the name of a well-known doctor's group in the area. Sure, they have a deal with said doctor's group, but it is no better than having the entire field available that medicare would have given.
I see advertising claiming all sorts of token "benefits" you're missing out on if only you call and "review your coverage"
It's like Republicans want Joe Biden to win lmao
Old people don't have this info
Depends. Is that old person a fascist cultist, then they won't. Is that old person not a fascist, then there is a high chance of them having this info. It is not the age of the person, but who that person is which matters in this context.
Young gen z fascists won't have this info either.
Isnt this the stuff old people watch out for the most? Same thing with the nursing homes that depend on that insurance money right?
The Repugnantcon Betrayal will not be televised.
A good read about the Democrats and why they losed to the profit of the extrem right is Leftism Reinvented: Western Parties from Socialism to Neoliberalism by Stephanie L. Mudge.
Thanks
No problems if it can help!
This is the best summary I could come up with:
If Republicans win the presidential race this year, the push to fully privatize Medicare, the government health insurance program for seniors and people with disabilities, will only intensify.
Philip Verhoef, president of the single-payer advocacy group Physicians for a National Health Program, tells Rolling Stone it would be “disastrous” to make Medicare Advantage the default enrollment option.
As The New York Times reported in 2018, during Medicare’s open enrollment period, the Trump administration emailed messages to millions of beneficiaries touting the private plans.
Trump’s administration also helped make Medicare Advantage more attractive by expanding the range of perks the plans can offer to enrollees, allowing them to add benefits such as transportation to doctors’ offices and meal delivery.
Medicare Advantage plans, he says, are “tasked with managing your care, and telling you what you can and can’t do, and what is and is not covered — that is the opposite of putting beneficiaries in control of how they spend their dollars.”
But the financial incentive to deny care is baked into the Medicare Advantage model: The private plans are given a fixed amount of money every month to provide coverage for each enrollee; paying out fewer dollars means extra profit.
The original article contains 1,164 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
BEEN planning.
They are like a flesh eating octopus that escaped its containment.
Yay. More healthcare I can't afford.
Where was the urgency when Obama, Trump, and now Biden pushed to privatize? They are all complicit in the majority of current Medicare recipients being enrolled in privatized care. Trump accelerated it, then Biden took the ball and ran with it
view more: next ›