this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024

648 points (98.9% liked)

News

23427 readers

5510 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

648

Proud Boys member gets six years in prison for Capitol riot after insulting judge (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave to c/news

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Marc Bru repeatedly interrupted chief judge before the sentence was handed down, calling him a ‘clown’ and a ‘fraud’

A man who stormed the US Capitol with fellow Proud Boys far-right extremist group members was sentenced on Wednesday to six years in prison after he berated and insulted the judge who punished him.

Marc Bru repeatedly interrupted chief judge James Boasberg before the sentence was handed down, calling him a “clown” and a “fraud” presiding over a “kangaroo court”.

The judge warned Bru that he could be kicked out of the courtroom if he continued to disrupt the proceedings.

“You can give me 100 years and I’d do it all over again,” said Bru, who was handcuffed and shackled.

“That’s the definition of no remorse in my book,” the judge said.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Zombiepirate 146 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Bru has been representing himself with an attorney on standby. He has spewed anti-government rhetoric that appears to be inspired by the sovereign citizen movement. At the start of the hearing, Bru demanded that the judge and a prosecutor turn over five years of their financial records.

Just to make it perfectly clear that this guy is an imbecile.

[–] newthrowaway20 94 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I mean if the last decade hasn't proven it yet, I just want to reiterate. You don't need to be smart to destroy America.

[–] agent_flounder 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe you need to be dumb and ignorant to destroy America.

[–] newthrowaway20 11 points 10 months ago

It certainly helps..

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

You don't need to be smart to destroy America.

Its a lot easier to break stuff than it is to build it or fix it.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] FlyingSquid 18 points 10 months ago

And yet he still only got six years.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 10 months ago (1 children)

According to another article the guy is 43. Imagine proudly throwing away the majority of your forties for Donald fucking Trump. Like most people when I was young I always thought 40 was ancient but now that I'm approaching it myself I simply can't imagine anything being worth losing these years. My partner and I finally have the stability and the means to do many of the things we've always dreamed of. It would be such a waste.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I suspect he'd didn't have as much to lose by throwing away his 40s as you would. He doesn't sound like the most rational of sorts, so probably didn't have the 'stability and the means" for a good life you mention.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He did have enough free time on his hands to travel from wherever he lives to storm the capitol., so you’re probably onto something there.

[–] deweydecibel 5 points 10 months ago

Well, let's not lay a blanket statement like that down on anybody that makes an effort to join a protest in DC. It is travel, a day's worth of travel for some, or a flight, and you have to book a stay somewhere, pay for parking, food, etc. There are lot of people who will commit to that for a protest for really good causes, and that shouldn't be downplayed.

But then there's assholes like this, who did all of that...for Donald Trump.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 10 months ago (3 children)

He assumed that since Trump gets away with insulting the judge, he could do it, too. This was partially a consequence of treating Trump with kid gloves and tolerating his shenanigans. I hope Trump’s other judges take note, but they probably won’t.

[–] stoly 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well they REALLY want to make things stick to Trump which means giving absolutely zero possibility of an appeal determining bias from the judge. They want these cases to be run so well and so by the book that there's no chance of him getting off on a technicality.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I understand that, but they’ve gotta draw the line somewhere. So far, it doesn’t look like they have. All the various judges seem to have done is sternly told him things that are common sense to virtually every other defendant.

[–] stoly 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

He's got like 3 gag orders that have through multiple appeals courts and been affirmed. How many previous presidents were sued criminally and given gag orders? Precisely 1. This is still truly gigantic. It took someone like Trump to come along for the court system to ever even have to test the limits of how you treat former presidents.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Jimmyeatsausage 6 points 10 months ago

Slapping Trump down in court would feel awesome until whatever decisions the judge makes get overturned on appeal on some technicality. I'm perfectly happy with the current strategy of giving him all the rope he wants. If his supporters want to fuck around and find out how the justice system works for folks in their income bracket...well, I'm sorry but insurrection has consequences and unapologetic insurrection has bigger consequences.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 51 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Should have took him up on that 100 years proposal.

[–] EdibleFriend 40 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

But, of course, he's another one who got a slap on the wrist even after flat out going Goofy meme on this shit.

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] grue 31 points 10 months ago

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] TheJims 47 points 10 months ago (14 children)

One less trump voter

[–] Oderus 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

One less American that can't own a gun

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (13 replies)

[–] Grobmobularb 42 points 10 months ago (2 children)

He’s just hoping Drumpf will get elected and pardon them all. He probably would too. If Drumpf gets back into the Oval Office, kiss this country goodbye.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Trump doesn't care about these useful idiots.

They can't scratch his back, he won't even acknowledge them let alone pardon them.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

True but by pardoning them, the next batch of insurrectionists will be a lot more bolder and violent.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Bold of you to assume Trump thinks that far ahead.

[–] machinin 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Reckless of you not to.

[–] Olhonestjim 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Trump is a malignant narcissist. Other people barely exist to him, unless they are actively fawning over him at that very moment. The guy is incapable of long term planning.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Yes, but people around him are able to convince him "Hi, Mr President, you know these guys... Yeah, it's in your best interest to pardon them because XYZ..."

load more comments (8 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago

“You can give me 100 years and I’d do it all over again,” said Bru, who was handcuffed and shackled.

This is why you don't give terrorists a second chance.

[–] Ensign_Crab 36 points 10 months ago (3 children)

And prosecutors were seeking 7 years 3 months.

Are judges ever not lenient in these cases?

[–] themeatbridge 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Judges have been lenient in 82% of the sentencing of these terrorists.

[–] agitatedpotato 8 points 10 months ago

Im sure that won't come back to bite the government in the ass.

[–] stoly 20 points 10 months ago

They save the real big sentences for marijuana and protesting oil pipelines.

[–] Mammal 5 points 10 months ago

These are the types of cases where it pays to be lenient.

Without going deeply into the history & tactics of dealing with insurgencies: If the goal is social stability and reconciliation - it is best to be lenient the first time, but then be absolutely over-the-top brutal the second.

[–] IronpigsWizard 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So, this guys' whole thing is basically, "GRRR, I'M ANGRY. FUCKOFF AND GIVE ME 6 YEARS".

Man, you sure showed that judge and everyone else by being locked up for 6 years now.

[–] lennybird 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

2,190 days where I'll be out in the sunshine, eating delicious food, playing with my kids, and he'll be stuck inside most of the time eating prison food lol.

#freedom

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Gazumi 24 points 10 months ago

No prizes for guessing which gang he'll be joining in prison.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

Is this guy claiming to be a hard core Antifa who was trying to make Trump look bad?

[/s]

[–] Red_October 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah he knew he was fucked, he was just trying to make sure he was memorable enough that Dump would be sure to pardon him if he won a second term, which this guy is really really counting on.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Hard to tell, if you're dumb enough to talk for Trump's lies about the election, you are also be dumb enough to berate a judge.

Also could be that if you are dumb enough to believe that this will get trumps attention and he won't think solely about himself, you are also dumb enough to berate a judge. So it's kind of a catch 22.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] anarchy79 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Reminds me of State of Georgia vs Fenton Allen, court transcript by Rick and Morty.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bjDkQR57fA

[–] stoly 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

LOL this is precisely why the Trump judges are not being aggressive. No way this case didn't get tossed or retried on appeal because of the judge's behavior.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] brlemworld 11 points 10 months ago

Sounds like the sentence should be 101 years so they don't do it again.

[–] Carrick1973 5 points 10 months ago

Just wanted to find out what the count of these guys being secret leftist Antifa members is... oh yeah, zero...

Yet Another Imbecile for Trump... I didn't realize just how quickly defunding schools in red states would affect the electorate...

[–] paddirn 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

When keeping it real goes wrong - MAGA edition

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments