How many?
Also, the bigger issue is not being able to escape the fire because you can't find the manual releases. Pretty horrible death. Probably done that way to save a little bit of extra money to line Musk's pockets.
How many?
Also, the bigger issue is not being able to escape the fire because you can't find the manual releases. Pretty horrible death. Probably done that way to save a little bit of extra money to line Musk's pockets.
Perhaps the closest term is "cognitive dissonance." I don't think current usage best fits your description, although the original event that inspired the term certainly does.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/cognitive-dissonance.html
Cognitive dissonance was first investigated by Leon Festinger, arising out of a participant observation study of a cult that believed that the earth was going to be destroyed by a flood, and what happened to its members — particularly the really committed ones who had given up their homes and jobs to work for the cult — when the flood did not happen.
While fringe members were more inclined to recognize that they had made fools of themselves and to “put it down to experience,” committed members were more likely to re-interpret the evidence to show that they were right all along (the earth was not destroyed because of the faithfulness of the cult members).
There is the sunk-cost fallacy, but that is more about investments. I don't know if it's refers to popularity like OP wants.
Why not husband/wife?
I've seen the argument that it is actually better to cripple the bridge than take it out completely. As it is, Russia still has to expend significant resources to protect a symbol that has very little strategic military value. Once it's destroyed, those resources are freed up to use elsewhere. I think I agree with that. It can be destroyed later as a final triumph.
Apparently the people don't care enough to stop their soldiers from burning kids alive. Why should I care what happens to them?
After burning those kids alive, honestly, I've given up caring what happens to the people in Israel.
Stop enabling the genocide? Please?
Thanks, that's a useful description.
Pretty ingenious.
There was the question of why Vance would work for someone he had called Hitler. His public statements are they here was convinced after Trump's first term that Trump was a good president.
In fact, there are private texts stating that Vance believed Trump's presidency was a failure. This was new information. It made it clear that he wasn't convinced by Trump's presidency.
It probably doesn't make much difference to most voters, but it is significant information.
I didn't understand how the OP did this:
Create an Apple account with [email protected]
Is that just a spoofed email? What would be the steps to do that?
You seem awfully upset that people are criticizing Tesla. Are you okay?