this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
215 points (95.4% liked)

196

16582 readers
1960 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What always bugs me about this is that they had the boys in underwear. Like, if it's fine to symbolize with clothed girls, why do you need to do it differently with boys?

[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

100% with ya, the double standards are kinda crazy. The differnce between the first two panels is pretty stark in regards to the kid, even if the point is essentially the same.

My take is that male bodies need to exposed in order to be sexualized so they read vulnerable, but female bodies are can be read as sexualized and vulnerable regardless how they are presented. But that doesn't really explain panel 4 & 6.

Weird choices. If anyone knows who the artist is, I'd be curious how they would talk about this.

[–] creditCrazy 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With the priest it makes sense to me considering they are infomas for being pedophiles but the rest yea why couldn't they have been clothed

[–] Stovetop 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Especially since #1 and #2 are both instances of sexual violence.

I'd have dresses #1 in a choir boy outfit, #4 in a hospital johnny, and #6 can wear whatever honestly.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Because only the males are fit to actually dress like Jesus. /s

[–] idunnololz 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah! They should all be in their underwear! (this is a joke Mr. FBI agent)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What the fuck is this supposed to mean??

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

catholic priests, sex tourism, war

(abortion?), gun crime/gangs, obesity

...hurts kids

[–] Dultas 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Organ harvesting. See the cooler.

[–] Rukmer 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am still so confused about this one. Is this like a thing? Honestly I wouldn't be surprised anymore. All the rest is pretty real, we basically "sacrifice" children by giving religions so much power, war, unregulated fast food, etc.

[–] 100_percent_a_bot 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Big thing in many developing countries. There's entire villages where many people give away their own organs or those of their children for the equivalent of a couple hundred bucks. Mostly kidneys, since you can live with one of them but still pretty messed up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not so long time ago, at the dawn of this century this has been a substantial issue even in Europe, in Moldova. Now a big thing in Afghanistan.

[–] Skullgrid 4 points 1 year ago

Gonna be a big thing soon in argentina

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/20/argentina-election-whats-next-after-javier-mileis-victory

[Milei] has also raised the possibility of allowing people to sell their own vital organs.

[–] greedytacothief 19 points 1 year ago

Or that children are being sacrificed to them. Crucification was a state punishment, so maybe they are trying to say that governments are complicit in the crime? Maybe?

Or maybe that children are our saviors/future, but they are being sacrificed on the backs of these topical issues?

Art is hard.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That abortion thing is messed up. The rest is true...

[–] 100_percent_a_bot 27 points 1 year ago

It's probably organ harvesting, not abortion

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ITT: no one really knows what the hell the artist was trying to portray with this piece other than the blatantly obvious

[–] Rukmer 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like almost all of it is blatantly obvious everyone the surgeon with the cooler, since I'm not aware of any child organ harvesting epidemic (and I maybe don't want to be).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IanSomnia 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm afraid to ask. What does the bottom left represent?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's organ box next to them, maybe organ harvesting?

[–] IanSomnia 5 points 1 year ago

Ah, that makes sense =/

[–] yesman 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Prob some anti-medicine/ pharma/ vax or other conspiracy stuff. Organ harvesting from children isn't a thing, unless that's the conspiracy and we're right back where we started.

The only reasonable thing I can think of is lack of access to healthcare, and I guess insurance people and lobbyists don't have uniforms so they went with a doctor.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Child organ trafficking is much rarer than sexual, but very much a thing that exists. Conspiracies may exaggerate, but don't make the mistake of dismissing the existence entirely as a consequence

[–] IanSomnia 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not thinking antimedicine. More like a criticism of the broken system.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Dog I think this is just about pedophilia or which children each person figuratively hurts?

[–] Zugyuk 18 points 1 year ago

Holy fucking shit

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Kind of fucked up that the child in the bottom right has to pose for something he's already experiencing

[–] De_Narm 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Really unsure about the symbolism here. Didn't Jesus die on the cross for our sins to be forgiven or something along those lines? So this kinda implies the abused children die to give forgivness to the people they are nailed to here...

Please correct me if I'm wrong, I've never been to a church and neither has anyone I know.

[–] FancyManacles 13 points 1 year ago

Even in religious circles the forgiveness part is normally left out. The phrase often repeated is "Jesus died for your sins" without any mention of forgiveness. Since that is the common turn of phrase then this depicts children suffering/dying because of the sins of someone else.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I mean this whole Jesus thing is pretty fucked up / meta, so I see no difference here

[–] unreachable 9 points 1 year ago

every human atrocities in expenses of next generations

[–] pleasemakesense 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tourism and its effects on local people? Idk

[–] seaQueue 37 points 1 year ago

I'm guessing sex tourism

[–] TheMauveAvenger 6 points 1 year ago

Camera implies upskirts I think.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Asian sex tourism, cf Gary Glittter

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since it could be so many things like the other comments are pointing out, I think it's supposed to prompt conversation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I dont understand the middle one in the upper row and the left one in the bottom row. The rest are pretty obvious to me.

[–] SendMePhotos 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Upper middle I think is sex trafficking - used to be huge in Thailand.

Bottom left... Abortion?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe but the bottom left looks like an organ transporting container and i dont think they use that for abortions. But ig its art even tho i dont agree with everything it represents.

[–] Pandawhiskers 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure if it's photo clarity, but it does kind of look to me like the boy has stitched up cavity down his center

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Bottom left looks like forced organ harvesting? Not sure how often that actually happens to children, but the world is a fucked up place so it's possible I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait. What's the doctor one?

[–] Maalus 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That kid is way too young for organ harvesting though. Most of the demand for organs is from adults who need adult sized organs and kid organs won't keep growing in a body that's long stopped producing all the hormone indicators to signal for growth.

or... or, so I'm told.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Interesting, I assumed it would grow to fit

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But what’s the context? I’m completely unaware that doctors were murdering or sacrificing children to steal their organs.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It's a common conspiracy theory promoted by far right nutjobs.

load more comments
view more: next ›