moss

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] moss 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] moss 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] moss 4 points 11 hours ago

it's actually glep, from the show Smiling Friends!

[–] moss 6 points 11 hours ago

please add the word "rule" to your post title

57
piss rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 20 hours ago by moss to c/196
 
[–] moss 5 points 20 hours ago

CREDIT: BEETLEMOSES

57
Smiling Frules (lemmy.world)
submitted 20 hours ago by moss to c/196
 
[–] moss 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

we got a little silly. fortunately everything has pretty much been resolved. atp the activity is about 40% here, 30% 196 on blahaj and 30% onehundredninteysix on blahaj

[–] moss 1 points 1 day ago
[–] moss -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

did you seriously go and comment this on both instances? talk about lame.

[–] moss 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please tag as nsfw.

[–] moss 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

??????? this is a joke about how projesterone, a hormone that I and many other trans women take, makes you horny.

I'm really not liking how your group seems dead set on misinterpreting everything I say to the point of seeming absurd to an outside observer.

[–] moss 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

this is an old profile picture that I've kept because lemmy.world keeps giving me a json error whenever I try to change it. also, the caption that is cut out in my profile picture is "white people when there's cheese at the function" neither of these are relevant to what you just said but I'm glad you know now what you did not before

54
Progesterule (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago by moss to c/196
 
101
late stage ruleism (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago by moss to c/196
 
[–] moss 4 points 1 day ago
 

TL;DR: We tried to move the community because of moderatorial concerns, but fumbled how we went about doing so.

First and Foremost:

We'd like to formally apologize for springing this on you all out of nowhere, and for taking so long to respond to the backlash. With retrospect, we understand that we should have notified you all beforehand to create an opportunity to give us feedback. We understand that a lot of respect and trust was lost, and we expect it'll take a lot of work and a lot of time before we can earn it back, but we would be grateful if y’all gave us that chance.

What happened, and why?

The primary issue that incited this was because we don't fully agree with the admin's moderation policies. By and large they do a great job and align with us on mod actions, but there have been several cases where we strongly disagreed, and our choices were overruled.

For example, 2 months ago, Kolanaki reached out to us via email and said they were banned from 196 for “playing the victim” and asked us why we banned him, but we didn’t. Moss talked to them and realized that the ban was unjust after reviewing the comment he was banned for. If he had never contacted us, we wouldn't have known about the ban, and they would have still thought we banned them.

There were a few similar events in a short time frame, leading to a few posts/comments in the community about the heavier modding policies. It's possible some posts/comments were misunderstood by Ada, or she interpreted things differently than we would have, but it led to some bans that we felt were indeed heavy-handed, and would not violate our rules in even the most uncharitable of interpretations. We have found that this is an ongoing trend when it comes to moderation of our community from the Admins. We oppose this because it leads to many users who otherwise mean well ending up alienated and removed for reasons that are frankly completely unfair. This is, in our opinion, counter to what we set out to build in our community.

It was made clear to us that it was their instance, and that we didn’t have a say in who would be banned and what would be removed. This is, of course, perfectly valid. It’s their instance, therefore it's up to them to decide what goes, but we no longer wanted to be the ones seen as accountable for moderation actions we have no control over. For this reason, we wanted to transfer out of lemmy.blahaj.zone. As much as we wanted to stay in the LGBTQ instance, we couldn't come to an agreement with Ada, so we talked to her about transferring out and got her blessing.

How we messed up

The most major failing on our part is, of course, that we didn’t announce the migration beforehand. Besides that, we also didn’t explain why we made the choices we made and only gave very vague answers. We avoided sharing the justification for our actions because we didn’t want to cause drama and/or exacerbate the situation, but this lack of substantiating our actions only caused the situation to worsen.

Going forward (if we may), we won't make the same mistakes again. From now on, we will attempt to be as transparent as possible.

FAQ

Why we chose lemmy.world

Many people have been asking about why we moved to lemmy.world. It already hosts the majority of large communities and besides this uncomfortable level of centralization, it has also been somewhat controversial as of late. Despite that, we still chose lemmy.world due to the following reasons:

  1. Moss's communication with the admins, and their agreement to let us moderate the community as we see fit. Ruud, after looking over our rules, agreed to abstain from taking admin action to curate or otherwise moderate our community, unless absolutely necessary.
  2. The instance is large enough to support traffic without performance issues (other instances like lemm.ee, sh.itjust.works, and lemmy.dbzer0.com would have been fine too), and the instance has a certain degree of guaranteed longevity.
  3. I was given a list that was kindly made by the lemmy.world people as a part of our transfer detailing those who are banned on Blahaj.zone, but not on Lemmy.world, making moderation discrepancies much easier to clean up post-transfer.
  4. Our agreement with Ruud predated the now-rescinded policy changes
  5. It was, to the best of our knowledge, the most federated-with instance. We have come to understand that this is not necessarily the case.

Why not have another team take over the original 196?

This is a similar situation with what happened over on Reddit. 196 mods didn't agree with admins and were eventually replaced (difference here is that we were not forced out, but chose to leave). As Lemmy was a large gathering spot for people fleeing Reddit, we felt it was better to try to keep the community together and move together. Having another team take over splits the community. The more fragmentation there is, the less longevity and volume of community each skew will have.

What about the possibility of more trolls, neoliberals, bad actors, sealions, and transphobes on Lemmy.world?

Another huge issue was that the mods and the community were not on the same page regarding lemmy.world, their admins, and their policies. We understand the concern about trolls/bad-actors/transphobes, but we feel well-equipped to handle these issues. In addition, we've been in contact with the lemmy.world admins for a while now, and they've assured us that they'd allow us to moderate our community however we saw fit. All this being said, we still failed to communicate that to the community before taking action, which has undermined any assurances that we have given after the fact. We cannot apologize enough for that.

What about the people who are using instances that are defederated from lemmy.world (e.g. Beehaw)

This is an unfortunate issue that we were not aware of at the time of transfer. We're not sure what the solution is, but want to make our community as accessible as possible. Community solutions are welcome.

Did you migrate because of X? (addressing speculation)

  • We didn’t migrate due to anything related to neopronouns
  • We didn’t migrate due to us supposedly not wanting to use blahaj.zone lemmy accounts
  • We didn’t migrate due to us having friends who were banned from lemmy.blahaj.zone
  • We didn’t migrate due to us wanting to make the space less queer/leftist/etc
  • We didn’t migrate due to us getting secretly ousted by the Blahaj admin team

What now?

Well, we're not sure. We could go back on our decision and stay on blahaj.zone, continue on lemmy.world, do both, or try something else. Truth be told, we don't know what to do. For now, we will leave the comments open to civil community discourse, and choose our course of action from there.

Sincerely, Qaz, Rmbp, Greembow, A_Very_big_Fan, Peachy, and Moss.

212
submitted 3 days ago by moss to c/196
 
29
Elden Rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 days ago by moss to c/196
 
-9
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by moss to c/196
 

I'm just happy to be here

60
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by moss to c/196
 

Please incorporate the word rule in your post titles

Here are the things that get you banned

  • Saying anything remotely iffy with a lemmygrad, threads, or hexbear account.
  • Prejudice of any kind
  • Tankie behaviour
  • Nazi behaviour
  • Authoritarian behaviour
  • Genocide denial
  • Anything else that is clearly bad

Ban length varies, and is mostly based off of whether or not I think you will change your behavior. I have banned certain people for upwards of 2000 days.

Things that get your post/comment removed

  • AI generated content
  • Anything in the banlist
  • Posts that are so off topic that they don’t fit on 196 at all
  • Moldy memes (old memes, crusty memes, irrelevant memes. The type of things you’d see on your aunt’s Facebook page or Elon musk’s Twitter account with a laughing emoji as the caption) Except on moldy monday. On this day and only this day moldy memes are not only allowed, but encouraged. The crustier the better. The type of thing that’s been reposted at least 2,000 times with filters and bad crops and watermarks and hopefully minions. please caption with moldy rule
  • Corpoposting
  • IRL GORE IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER ANY CONDITION.

NSFW RULES

NSFW Content is now fully permitted BUT it must be tagged. Any NSFW content that has not been tagged and blurred will be removed. Content warnings should also be added to the title in brackets. Example: [penis] or: [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged. Yes, even female breasts.

If you have any issues, please reach us at [email protected] or our public matrix channel PLEASE do not DM me, as I am not consistently available and tend to step away from the mantle for weeks to months at a time.

 

I can't run 196 and 195 solo, so I'm looking for some mods! Leave your "applications" in the comments.

20
rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by moss to c/196
 
34
rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by moss to c/[email protected]
 
view more: next ›