this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
382 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

61992 readers
4561 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew 327 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)
  • Claims in an interview that he is qualified to handle a social media company on the internet because he has "put internet in space"
  • Buys a financially struggling company for way too much money
  • Dismantles everything that made it attractive
  • Insults and fires the most competent employees who are trying to stop him from destroying the platform
  • Doesn't pay the employees he fired owed severance, further discouraging the best of the workforce from ever applying to work there
  • Turned it into something so repulsive and toxic that the users and advertisers start to leave
  • Told the advertisers to "go fuck themselves"
  • Tried to sue the advertisers into returning, further discouraging any new advertiser from ever doing business with him
  • Destroys the brand recognition by renaming it to a letter of the alphabet he personally likes but nobody else gives a crap about
  • Abuses his admin powers to steal a handle with the name he wanted from its owner, further eroding the user's trust in him handling the platform
  • Continues ruining the platform, turning it into his personal soap box to push his (toxic) ideas and abuses his powers to reduce the visibility of those he doesn't like while claiming to be radically pro-free speech.
  • Alternative platforms have gained momentum and have reached critical mass and will soon become the new default platform people will flock to. High profile users leave.
  • Whines and bitches about the company not making any money.

Hey guys, I'm starting to think that this guy's fortune has absolutely nothing to do with his skills at running a business

[–] VindictiveJudge 96 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Destroys the brand recognition by renaming it to a letter of the alphabet he personally likes but nobody else gives a crap about

I'm beginning to suspect he only likes that letter because it's the middle part of a swastika.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hey, it's not just that! It's also decimal 88 in the ASCII table.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

🫣I see!

Elon uses X as ASCII 88 and Proton CEO uses 1011000 as binary ASCII

What about all these Nazi people everywhere suddenly?!

[–] Evotech 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

In pretty sure Andy is born in 1988 to be fair

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

Oh shit. I didn't think of that. That's probably why.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NeoNachtwaechter 49 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hey guys, I'm starting to think that this guy's fortune has absolutely nothing to do with his skills at running a business

Great summary btw. and you are absolutely right here. He is a terrible manager.

Remember the time when he slept at the Tesla factory just because he didn't trust anybody and thought he himself must rescue it all by working so much overtime and make all the decisions.

[–] GladiusB 33 points 2 weeks ago

Probably because his wife kicked him out for being an asshole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek 23 points 2 weeks ago

Did you include the whole 'verified' tag fiasco in your list? I didn't see it explicitly in there, but maybe it falls under a general functionality fuck-up point.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What was the username he stole? Don’t remember that one

Also, don’t forget the disastrous rollout of the blue checks when a few people imitated companies and said Lockheed wouldn’t be doing business with Israel and a few others. But I guess that was the best thing he did, honestly, because that shit was hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

I believe he took user name 'x' because he wanted it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xenomor 140 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I would be shocked if the company was actually breaking even.

[–] rational_lib 34 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think he's sugar-coating it because their bonds are about to go up for sale. From the article:

While equity investors have reportedly slashed the value of their stakes by as much as 78 percent, the Journal reports, “banks hope to sell senior debt at 90-95 cents on the dollar, while retaining more-junior holdings.”

If they were breaking even, the bonds wouldn't be getting sold at a loss. Keep in mind, the bond holders get paid before the stock holding investors, so if they're taking a loss, the equity investors are getting nothing (hence the 78 percent cut, basically their share is only worth the odds of a miraculous turnaround). That doesn't happen with a company unless it's losing money.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

At absolute best it's breaking even before debt service.

Maybe he's still not just paying rent on some buildings and miraculously hasn't been kicked out yet

[–] [email protected] 109 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Turns out, nazi business is bad business

[–] iopq 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A victory for the free market

[–] rottingleaf 10 points 2 weeks ago

Too bad MIC doesn't operate on free market.

[–] random_character_a 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hopefully as bad as nazi archaeology

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Do we need a catchy “go Nazi get…____” catchphrase? It was such a g when the right wing did it! They do love a good catchphrase. Easier to remember.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

How about "Go Nazi get shot in the head"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Meron35 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Go nazi declare bankruptcy

Redpilled? Get killed

Go fash lose cash

Lick boot, lose loot

Go right eat shite

All incel, no braincells

Nazi salute, go destitute

ADL? Common L

Ku Klux? Lose bucks

Go apartheid, all downside

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 88 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

X has added some features, like job listings

Who the fuck looks for jobs on X?

[–] [email protected] 99 points 2 weeks ago

Nazis probably

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 78 points 2 weeks ago

Go fash; lose cash.

[–] acosmichippo 68 points 2 weeks ago

hm, someone told me it was so easy to cut wasteful spending.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's no fucking way they're breaking even.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

@breakfastmtn @cm0002 it already bought an election, how much it is worth?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah. Bought an election for a bum who doesn't understand loyalty or how to pay his bills. Lol.

What a Dumbass.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen 51 points 2 weeks ago

The man bought an election with disinformation and lobbying, who gives a fuck what he says about this company. Who knows what the fuck break even even means in his addled brain.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

After Twitter already not being profitable. Add all the loss of marketing from businesses and users leaving, then the cost of all the bots and lawsuits.

How come it is "barely breaking even"? Who is paying them? Fascists?

[–] _sideffect 13 points 2 weeks ago

All the blue checkmarks probably helps, and the premium crap too

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TehWorld 44 points 2 weeks ago

Bullshit. No way does Twitter make anywhere near a profit, and that’s NOT taking into account the payments on 44Bn.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago

Aw geez, what a shame. As if Neo-Goebbels is going to shut his propaganda arm over something as trivial as money.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago

Musk also said that the company could become cash-flow positive “within months” nearly two years ago, and it still faces over $1 billion in annual interest payments on the loans.

3 months maybe, 6 months definitely

[–] just_another_person 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They should be losing fucking money hand over fist, is the problem.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

If you think Elon is being honest about ‘breaking even’, you haven’t been paying attention. Twitter is in the hole, and he’s lying through his fascist little teeth to either save face, or manipulate some sort of upcoming move.

[–] primehunter326 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

With the site now serving as an outlet for right wing narratives and misinformation that benefits the administration, there will be an incentive to prop it up financially if need be. Banks have been trying unsuccessfully to offload their debt used to finance the acquisition, so it seems investors aren’t as confident in the site’s long term profitability even with its newfound role.

[–] DrFistington 19 points 2 weeks ago

If only they had competant management...

[–] obinice 18 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

At this point if you're still working there knowingly building a powerful fascist gathering platform after so much time available to leave, taking dirty Nazi money as payment for your services...

I dunno man... should I feel bad for the staff, or are the remaining staff complicit enough at this point?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

No you're not

Twitter broke barely even

You paid twice it's worth and then within 2 years got it to only 20% of its value, pushing away all power users and advertisers.

You're bleeding money like there is no tomorrow and you'll still be bankrupt or jailed soon enough. If not during Trump's presidency, then most certainly after it

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Wouldn't barely breaking even actually be exceptionally good in the history of twitter? I though it had been burning money from its conception.

[–] FooBarrington 10 points 2 weeks ago

No, Twitter had started making a profit when he bought it. The last year they had a court case which made the year a loss, but the years before were profitable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it's time to fire half of the people! That will help.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] youvegotmoxie 14 points 2 weeks ago

Awww, is the world’s greediest man not making enough money?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

"Barely breaking even" and yet he keeps getting richer.

load more comments
view more: next ›