thefluffiest

Good thing nothing will happen until 2049

/s

Well it could’ve been worse. They could’ve planned to off Jack instead

4 in 5 people want more action on climate, as long as:

• they need not change anything themselves
• someone else pays for it
• it’s not in their way

Of het was niet de daadwerkelijke reden

Well in that case, the writings of Zarathustra (10th century BC) might be a good starting point

Remember, it’s only for six months

I agree with you on principle, but this chart is economics-based, like it or not. And many people do think like that.

My point here is for them: this chart is not realistic. For example, it almost equates lentils with chicken. Even though chicken involves a lot more costs, including in animal welfare, societal, etc.

Monetary cost is the wrong y-axis here, as it optimkzes only for mega-scale farming without taking its real costs in consideration. It should be ‘true cost’, which also accounts for environmental-, animal- and climate mitigation cost. And subsidies.

Monetary cost is the wrong y-axis here, as it optimkzes only for mega-scale farming without taking its real costs in consideration. It should be ‘true cost’, which also accounts for environmental-, animal- and climate mitigation cost.

Monetary cost is the wrong y-axis here, as it optimkzes only for mega-scale farming without taking its real costs in consideration. It should be ‘true cost’, which also accounts for environmental-, animal- and climate mitigation cost.

Monetary cost is the wrong y-axis here, as it optimizes only for mega-scale farming without taking its real costs in consideration. It should be ‘true cost’, which also accounts for environmental-, animal- and climate mitigation cost.

Ruggengraatloos als altijd