this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
241 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19346 readers
1955 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump praised Democratic Senator John Fetterman after their meeting at Mar-a-Lago, calling him a "commonsense person."

Fetterman, whose political stance has shifted rightward in recent years.

He has drawn criticism from Democrats, especially for co-sponsoring the Laken Riley Act, which allows detention of undocumented immigrants accused of nonviolent crimes.

His wife, Gisele, an advocate for immigrant rights and a former undocumented immigrant, was not mentioned in discussions on immigration.

The meeting marks an unexpected alignment between the two politicians.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Wow I can't believe this genocidal zio is also a fash. \s

[–] Sanctus 184 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Brain injuries and conservatism, name a more iconic duo

[–] CitizenKong 87 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Sanctus 16 points 2 days ago

Cursed power couple

[–] disguy_ovahea 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

He mocked Trump in the interview saying he was going to ask if he could be named pope of Greenland. I don’t think he’s ‘bending the knee’ so much as being civil. We’ll see when he votes.

https://youtube.com/shorts/CAcnL4EWi98

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm currious because there's 3 theories to fit the concept.

  1. He's two faced... when surrounded by left leaning people he's saying "yeah I'm going to tell trump he can suck it to his face!!!", then in front of the right leaning people he's actually bending the knee.

  2. He's being sarcastic, and trump is too narcisistic to see it.... IE see the right leaning people who can't understand how Colbert left their side.

  3. He's being civil, simply talking about what they can agree on and work with... and trump is calling that great.

[–] wpb 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We have some evidence for number 1 already. When he was campaigning, his messaging was progressive, and he actually referred to himself as a progressive plenty of times. Then, when Israel started the genocide, he became the hawkiest of hawks and claimed that he never said he was a progressive. The guy is a prime example of a career politician.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

While I agree, to the best I can see, so far I don't see his original claims as being anti-war. Yes he said he was progressive... but the specific examples I find of his old stances were healthcare etc... He does appear heavily neocon now, and he's largely silent on the issues he appeared progressive on. Which isn't super shocking as they are largely not the focus right now, as no one is talking about them.

IE you can't directly call it a two faced flip until he takes the opposite side of a stance he formerly took. I mean it's still fishy as hell and he's clearly making no effort to bring the issues that he ran on into the spotlight... but it's very hard to judge if he's flipped a stance, or just put his best foot forward.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 7 points 1 day ago

Aw little bitch fetterman.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I still say there is a correlation between rightism and brain damage.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most conservatives come by their brain damage slowly, through lead poisoning and childhood abuse; or through mental disorders like high-functioning psychopathy, narcissism, and sociopathy.

[–] Raiderkev 9 points 1 day ago

Fetterman had a stroke, killed half his brain cells and caught right up.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We need to understand that democrats are playing the republican game. They don't want to improve anything, just stay in power. I honestly believe we need a new party built fromthe ground up.

https://www.wtae.com/article/braddock-mayor-detains-jogger-after-hearing-possible-gunshots-1/7459686

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

* new government

[–] JackDark 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We need a unified party to challenge both republicans and democrats. Once dems see an actual threat to them, then they will try to act. More likely to compromise for a majority. That's why Bernie failed. He tried to play their game.

I'm for multiple parties in the end but we need a real threat first. Not one of two places but several across local and national.

[–] JackDark 0 points 1 day ago

we need a real threat first. Not one of two places but several across local and national.

*gestures broadly*

[–] [email protected] 90 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Fetterman is a disappointment. I voted for that mofo, but I definitely won't again.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago

For real. Dr Oz as one out of 100 senators vs Dr oz as HHS sec or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You had him vs Oz, unless you are talking about primaries.

[–] ramenshaman 25 points 1 day ago

Fetterman vs Oz? JFC that's brutal.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It'll be between him and a Republican who's worse, unless you can primary him.

[–] rigatti 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't bet against him being primaried.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I hope he is!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah. Fuck.

[–] YaDownWitCPP 73 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you know, MAGA was right, Fetterman was not mentally fit to be a Senator.

[–] CharlesDarwin 11 points 1 day ago

Been tired of Fetterman for quite a while. He can fuck right off.

[–] Suavevillain 20 points 1 day ago

He might as well just switch to the GOP and drop whatever remains of the act he is putting on.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 29 points 2 days ago

I feel really bad for Gisele. Ever since his stroke she’s been basically invisible.

[–] givesomefucks 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

One of these days people will realize just having a D by your name isn't enough...

As shit as Fetterman is, he's helping a lot of people realize it. So at least he's doing some good

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 18 points 2 days ago

Arguably still better than Dr. Oz.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

For real. One of the state reps for Detroit claims to be Democrat. But she blocked all the last minute bills and won't caucus with the Democrats this term. She's in a district that is over 80% D and the law makes it almost impossible to recall her. So frustrating

[–] rigatti 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hate that I voted for this guy multiple times.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Last line: “Has Fetterman turned so far to the right that he’s ignoring his own wife’s story—and is Trump secretly applauding him for it?“

Secretly???

Its loud and clear virtue signaling. Other Democrats take the knee and do as i say and maybe i wont be mad at you when i take revenge on everyone else.

[–] barnaclebutt 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You mean Harvard educated fake working slob John Fetterman is disingenuous? Tell me you are lying. He's our working man because of sweatshirts and shitty facial hair, right? RIGHT??? If not, I'm going to start thinking that politicians are just not good people.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 2 points 1 day ago

Anyone who manages to get themselves elected should on no account be allowed to do the job.