politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Brain injuries and conservatism, name a more iconic duo
Fascism and capitalism.
Cursed power couple
He mocked Trump in the interview saying he was going to ask if he could be named pope of Greenland. I don’t think he’s ‘bending the knee’ so much as being civil. We’ll see when he votes.
https://youtube.com/shorts/CAcnL4EWi98
I'm currious because there's 3 theories to fit the concept.
He's two faced... when surrounded by left leaning people he's saying "yeah I'm going to tell trump he can suck it to his face!!!", then in front of the right leaning people he's actually bending the knee.
He's being sarcastic, and trump is too narcisistic to see it.... IE see the right leaning people who can't understand how Colbert left their side.
He's being civil, simply talking about what they can agree on and work with... and trump is calling that great.
We have some evidence for number 1 already. When he was campaigning, his messaging was progressive, and he actually referred to himself as a progressive plenty of times. Then, when Israel started the genocide, he became the hawkiest of hawks and claimed that he never said he was a progressive. The guy is a prime example of a career politician.
While I agree, to the best I can see, so far I don't see his original claims as being anti-war. Yes he said he was progressive... but the specific examples I find of his old stances were healthcare etc... He does appear heavily neocon now, and he's largely silent on the issues he appeared progressive on. Which isn't super shocking as they are largely not the focus right now, as no one is talking about them.
IE you can't directly call it a two faced flip until he takes the opposite side of a stance he formerly took. I mean it's still fishy as hell and he's clearly making no effort to bring the issues that he ran on into the spotlight... but it's very hard to judge if he's flipped a stance, or just put his best foot forward.