this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
345 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19273 readers
2036 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk is reportedly staying at a $2,000-per-night cottage at Mar-a-Lago, just steps from Donald Trump’s main residence.

Musk moved in around Election Day, watched results with Trump, and left briefly around Christmas.

Concerns in Washington are growing over Musk’s influence on Trump, as he has participated in personnel meetings, foreign leader talks, and legislative interventions.

The close relationship between the two has drawn scrutiny, with Trump publicly praising Musk. Musk’s stay, accompanied by some of his children, highlights the billionaire’s deepening ties to Trump’s inner circle.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek 154 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Just right out into the open. This sort of blatant corruption would end careers back in the day.

[–] bfg9k 65 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Shame has become a meaningless word.

[–] WhatAmLemmy 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, the multi-decade propaganda machine of the right wing has been a roaring success.

That's why like 51% of the US voted for an sociopathic authoritarian oligarch, and the only other option was a pro-corporatocracy neoliberal.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

It doesn't change the meaning of your post but just a reminder that Trump got less than 50% of the popular vote.

[–] dirthawker0 2 points 2 days ago

And hypocrisy.

[–] AbidanYre 58 points 3 days ago

The number of Trump scandals that would have ended anyone else's career is mind boggling.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

It'd put people in jail back in the day.

Good thing rule of law has completely collapsed for everyone above a certain threshold of wealth, otherwise you could hope for consequences.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

The fact that it doesn't speak volumes about who really is in power.

[–] LovingHippieCat 66 points 3 days ago

If you pay attention to the Elon jet tracker this has been obvious for a bit. He's constantly flying to and from Mar-a-lago.

[–] Sam_Bass 43 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Guaranteed he had more to do with the election than people are told

[–] [email protected] 51 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He bought a social media company and made it blatantly political and then spent like $30million per month on just his donations to Trumps campaign.

I wouldn’t be surprised he did more than that.

[–] Sam_Bass 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All that is why he should be stopped

[–] wildcardology 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And who's going to do that?

[–] Sam_Bass 4 points 2 days ago

Someone less concerned about their own safety than their future

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm genuinely surprised at the prevailing assumption that Musk's interests align with those of the general population.

Like if you hired actual experts to lead the DOGE thing they would be motivated to act in the interests of their employer (the government) because their future success would depend on their ability to do so.

Musk's future success is dependent on his ability to restructure government according to his own interests exclusively.

Case in point, the current visa fiasco. His position is very clearly aligned with his own interests.

I don't care who you voted for, this Musk thing is just bonkers.

[–] Dasus 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm genuinely surprised at the prevailing assumption that Musk's interests align with those of the general population.

Who on Earth is assuming that?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

Everyone who isn't frothing at the mouth, apoplectic with rage at his involvement?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh my god, they were roommates

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 13 points 3 days ago

Just friends, dude

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 days ago

I mean, we have a location.

[–] SkunkWorkz 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah Musk needs to put his side chick in check.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 11 points 3 days ago

Return to office or be fired! Oh yeah I'm going to Florida, bye

[–] DaddleDew 44 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"I will call him... Mini-me"

[–] PP_BOY_ 21 points 3 days ago

I like this because it's unclear who's who in your eyes and it's obvious that both these megalomaniacs think its referring to the other

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Vance is like, “yo. Wtf, man?”

[–] TriPolarBearz 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ours 5 points 2 days ago

Dude really disappeared after making an ass of himself and when Musk in Chief came in.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree 3 points 2 days ago

Vance is Scott

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

"I guess he doesn't want any CHOCOLATE! It's like catnip for clones!"

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are we suggesting a two birds, one stone situation?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

2 guys 1 cup

[–] tomatolung 17 points 3 days ago
[–] FuglyDuck 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I wonder which smells worse. the main house or the cottage.

[–] Valorie12 27 points 3 days ago

Trump probably smells worse because is constantly shitting himself. Musk probably smells bad because he never bathes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago
[–] CharlesDarwin 19 points 3 days ago

Influence on donvict? Musk is the President and donvict is Musk's First Lady.

And if this broligarch is somehow thrown out as President and donvict needs a new sugar daddy(s), I suppose there is Thiel and Andreesen. And Vivek. Linda McMahon. Are the Mercers still around? What about the other members of the Paypal Mafia?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

So Musk is doing a lot of cottaging around Trump?

[–] Dkarma 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

I read this, and the Isaac Hayes/Chef voice that lives in the back of my head asked who's havin' butt sex?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Nuke it. We'd see if being a handful of radioactive ash bars one from being the president of the US of A.

[–] Serinus 5 points 3 days ago

Remember when Trump told his potential VP that they could run everything? Was that Pence, or was that pre-Pence?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Aww, they are having a sleepover!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is he paying inflated rates?

[–] whostosay 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

He is paying the equivalent of you or I paying one cent for a years rent, maybe less.

It's trickling down so much I hope it stops soon.

Edit, I did the math, and it's exaggerated, but functionally the same sentence.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The math on this is actually worth sharing, because it really does get across the unbelievably staggering scale of his wealth.

A lot of people struggle to pay $2,000 a month in rent. Elon is paying that every day. And yet, if he stayed there for a hundred years, it would still only amount to 0.016% of his current estimated net worth ($465bn).

If you had $10,000 in your bank account, this would be the equivalent of you paying $1.50 for one hundred years of rent. Or, as you said, about one and a half cents per year.

The idea that anyone ever deserves to be that wealthy is beyond insane.

[–] whostosay 3 points 2 days ago

Oooof, I did the math with 250B, I actually was not far off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

It's going to be on the taxpayer dime, like the accommodations for the SS protecting the family. That's the point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Kato Gaylin

[–] foggy 4 points 3 days ago

gayyyyyyyy

(Only pouring gas in a fire 😉)

[–] PP_BOY_ 3 points 3 days ago

Vice President Trump?