If only she could predict her fall like she can predict the stock market.
this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
192 points (98.0% liked)
politics
19222 readers
2639 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm up 15% by following her with Autopilot stock platform.
Ironically everyone who subscribes to that is literally pumping her every stock decision. It's wild how it's still that profitable.
Yeah. I did it on a lark just to see, but it was so good I'm scared to swap. Anti-Kramer is outperforming, though...
Is that shorting any pizza joint where you make your own pie?
Anti-kramer still cracks me up every time I hear about it lol. It makes you wonder, though, if the trackers are largely responsible for the success of the investments.
Who knows with markets? I throw a couple hundred bucks at it every month and try not to look at it other than to see if I'm wasting my money. My Pelosi shit is up by about 15%, but overall I'm at 12.5% with my ETF performance being meh.
In any case, it's all fucking fabricated. We're speculating on thoughts.
Man, AOC really isn't taking any prisoners when it comes to getting on that oversight committee.
I wonder if she's covered by United Health Care
🤞
Maybe she should accept it when god tells her to fucking retire already
All those insider trading-backed up profits aren't gonna pocket themselves
People like that live only for power and will never give it up voluntarily.
Oh no. Anyway.
That's usually a death sentence at her age. Breaking a hip is like the worst thing you can have happen during a fall at that age.
She's a congressperson. Access to some of the best healthcare in the world and she doesn't have to pay for it. I think she'll be fine...
It's about a 20% mortality rate for someone her age.
Why? What happens when you break a hip at that age?
Pneumonia, blood clots, embolisms...
Even in the best of cases, it's often seen as "the beginning of the end." The fracture leads to decreased mobility, which then leads to muscle loss and weakness even with physical therapy, making future falls more likely.
Yes, so many reasons. It's just not good.
They won’t put you under.
Hey Luxembourg, you broke it, you bought it! She's YOUR fucking problem now! AHAHAHA!
scene
No? Still in this timeline? ...fuck.
Even she's trying to get her medical procedures done abroad now!
Omfg fucking retire you fossilized continuing source of inspiration
But she only has 100s of millions of dollars.
She was born in 1940, how significant was her uncle to her really? She was 4.
Look at those shoes she's wearing. As a woman, I wish women would stop capitulating to society's/fashion's demand to wear shoes like this, that are made to cripple your ability to keep a sure footing, let alone run, and absolutely ruin your feet over time. Of course if you don't do it you're (gasp) not "fashionable", but that's only because these are the options you have to choose from unless you buy your own shoe factory or something.
I could go on a longer rant about it but I'll stop there. But when you wear shoes like that at 84 it's only a matter of time. Going down a marble staircase in them? very bad idea.
I don't think the correct stance is to judge a woman for what she chooses to wear but I know nothing about fashion so go off. There's plenty better things to criticize her for
I don't want to victim blame but we all make choices and gravity isn't some guy who can decide not to engage. An 84 year old woman with stability issues wearing stiletto heels is brave to say the least. I hope she recovers but she needs to stop wearing stuff like that.
don’t think the correct stance is to judge a woman for what she chooses to wear
So if an 84 year old woman said she wanted to wear stilts with roller skates, your response would be:
You go queen!
And not:
We need to get you checked for dementia
At some point you draw a line, or you're just enabling an 84 year old to hurt themselves.
I mean you made your point based on her being a woman. If you wanna criticize due to her age then I agree with you
Show me an 84 year old man wearing stilettos to tour a palace with marble floors and I'll criticize them too.
I recently looked through my (invite era) Gmail accounts filter rules.
One of the first fucking accounts I ever blocked was Pelosi. And I am way further left than that fraudulent cunt.
👵
Die die die my Darling.