this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
78 points (93.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27160 readers
2770 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I buy social medias and news outlets. Then I weaponize them to support a clueless gullible idiot candidate for POTUS.

I use my influence on him to get a position that will allow me to get grossly richer by favoring my own businesses, including crushing unions and force my employees to work to death on low wages.

When I reach 1 trillion $, I'll have much more resources to improve the planet and living conditions of my fellow humans.

But wait! Maybe I could do even more for humankind with 2 trillions $??

[–] spittingimage 20 points 1 week ago

Kinda hate that I'm upvoting you.

[–] spittingimage 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Assassinate the other billionaires. I genuinely believe billionaires are the source of all the biggest problems the planet has right now.

[–] weeeeum 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Someone is simply going to take their place. The problem isn't the billionaires themselves, its the system.

[–] spittingimage 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

We can do a lot more to change the system without a bunch of over-moneyed under-principled techbros trying to stop us.

[–] Cocodapuf 2 points 1 week ago

But if we do that today, what do we do tomorrow? When someone someone else takes that vacant CEO position and starts receiving that ludicrous salary, what then?

If you killed every billionaire every month, they probably wouldn't have time to seriously affect society, but then I suspect we'd have other problems. I have a feeling that would produce some negative outcomes for the economy and general quality of life.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] surph_ninja 4 points 1 week ago

Exactly what I came here to say. Hire a group, and tell them to start at the top of the Forbes list and work their way down. Send anonymous letters to media outlets that surrendering their wealth is the only way to save their lives.

It would dramatically improve the quality of living on this planet within 3 months.

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning 29 points 1 week ago

Create a fake lottery to help get a fascist into office for the end goal of turning that $300bil into $1tril.

[–] gi1242 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

here are a few ideas I had:

  • invest / subsidized green tech
  • lobby to stop oil and gas subsidies
  • lobby to stop meat subsidies
  • lobby for stricter environmental taxes and regulations.
  • subsidize repair services so that it's cheaper for people to fix things instead of buying new
  • offer bad politicians a lot of money to resign
  • buy companies that provide essential services (water gas net) and make them non profits
  • do the same to things like Uber Facebook Google, and make ads optional
  • make public transit free
  • make affordable healthcare
  • set up a charity with whatever's left. withdraw 4% a year and split evenly it between to anyone who asks for it
[–] Serinus 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

with whatever's left

Heh, several of your bullets can eat that full amount.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Solve the billionaire problem

[–] greedytacothief 13 points 1 week ago

Assuming it's the US

  • set up a fund to provide free school lunches until the government provides them
  • give grants for people to set up housing co-ops
  • hire my own army of Russian trolls (they do not need to be Russian, I am inclusive to all trolls) to fracture conservative unity/support progressive
  • buy up some social media companies. (YouTube would be best, but I don't the 300 billion is enough) make the algorithm progressive
  • whatever is left over goes to renewables and conservation efforts
[–] lethargic_lemming 11 points 1 week ago

bribe (sorry, i mean lobby) politicians to vote in interest of humanity. Environmental protection, public healthcare, solve the housing crisis/homeless epidemic, increase education budget spending, etc.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Fund free education and health care for everyone in the world regardless of race, nationality and creed. Imposed no matter how much kicking and screaming certain countries might do to oppose it. With appropriate countermeasures for each specific country that opposes it. A random country in the middle east that hates educating girls or whatever? Armed guards and other related measures as needed. US has entrenched for profit health care? Fund legislation that rips out the entire system by the roots etc.

Excess funds would be invested in such a way as to fund those programs in perpetuity. With safeguards put in place so that I can be reasonably certain that it won't be easy to dismantle from within or without.

Assuming I have enough money left over, I'd do the same for housing.

If I still have money left over if also fund ways of tackling the climate crisis and changing corporate strategy so instead of chasing infinite growth in a finite world the mentality is more about stability and stewardship, of the company and of the planet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

There are about 2 billion people under 14 in the world. Assuming half of them have access to free education you would still only have $300 per student.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] recklessengagement 10 points 1 week ago
[–] Ekybio 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Assumption is thats in dollars:

Buy every single relevant news outlet, social media platform and information network. Then you remove all the right-wing garbage and replace it with the actual truth. Agressivly ban accounts who spread lies and hate for violating guidelines. Make accounts visible if they are bots or not.

Be partisan about it: Progressive ideas over conservatism.

In essence: Remove as much poison from the internet as possible, so people are no longer getting sucked into conservative pipelines and bubbles.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

except then the people who owned those outlets would now have $300 billion…

[–] Alexstarfire 2 points 1 week ago

Were they lacking in money before the buyout? If not, does it actually change anything?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Reminds me a little of this short text adventure https://direkris.itch.io/you-are-jeff-bezos

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My initial thought was that since 10% of the population hoard 50% of the wealth, that I would take that 300,000,000 and divide it amongst the other 90% to flip the corporate script on it's head. But it turns out that's only 40 bucks per person....

I've long held the belief that the greatest damage to the working class is the phrase "you should feel lucky to even have a job." Because it allows the corporations to largely do whatever they want, creating a top-down economy by default.

But imagine if people only had to work if they wanted to. A writer could write without needing to get a "real job". A carpenter who loves making homemade furniture and selling it no longer has to limit his hobby because he's unable to make a living doing it. A person has a dream of running their own coffee shop, but can't because they need all of their hours to just make sure the kids are fed.

If everyone can pursue a living how they want to make a living instead of stepping on our passions because there are bills to pay, then suddenly, the corporations have to deserve US, and not the other way around. I don't need your shit wages. I don't need your lack of health care. Make it worth my while for me to give my skills to your company or GTFO.

That's essentially the dream of a UBI, and I initially thought I could kick start that by spreading my 300 billion around to the 90% rank and file. But it turns out I'm shit at math.

[–] Noodle07 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know you can get a nice militia with those billions, would be a shame if that militia went after the 0.5% to distribute their wealth

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah. That can buy a shit load of assasins

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Try to buy over 50% of ExxonMobil or Shell (Saudi Aramco and Sinopec probably aren't up for grabs) and shut down everything I can while holding on to the owned/leased land so nobody else can start there either. Fossil fuels get more expensive, hopefully pushing for a green change, and at least some of them remain in the ground.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Am I allowed to say I’d take out a few hits - in this totally fictitious scenario? Because that’s what I’d do. When the scum rises to the top it’s always best to wipe it off so it doesn’t suffocate what’s underneath. .

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Is it new money or money that already existed? If it already existed, burn it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

$300 Billion is both a huge sum for the individual, and a tiny sum for the world economy.

Lead by example, educate, and leverage.

Lead by building or converting one town to car free and 100% renewable.

Educate people on how to improve the world. Creating or buying radio and TV stations, producing entertaining programming.

Leverage by buying large fractions of companies to change their policies. Setup investor funds to do the same. Ensure all people I employ are paid well and treated with respect.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Start a new political party in the US that actually represents the people.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is a danish researcher called Björn Lomborg who has been researching this type of question a lot. He tends to get a lot of hate because the most cost efficient ways to spend money to do good isn't what people want it to be.

[–] spittingimage 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What are the most cost-efficient ways?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Iirc, micronutrients and HIV prevention, followed by preventing malaria. The idea is that we spend a little money now, to make many people grow up and be healthy, which avoids big costs to societies while at the same time generating people who can contribute more to the same societies. Many people want to solve the climate first, but it's very expensive for very little return. In an ideal world we would solve all the problems, but... we don't. So if we have limited resources, we should spend it where it does most long-term good. It's not a bad idea to do good things for the climate, but if we have to choose between things to do, it gives little benefit per dollar compared to other things.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think about this all the time and I still have no idea.

A good chunk of that money would end up going to experts to advise me how best to use it since I would want to maximize what good I could bring... 😩

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Well now, that would spoil the surprise, wouldn’t it?

[–] Jumi 4 points 1 week ago

Give 299 billion to Ukraine

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Free public transit and then a transition of car leasing businesses into public sector too so owning a car would be unnecessary and needed changes like switching to e-cars and building infrastructure goes smooth and according to general city planning. Regular commutes make people unequal in that it costs some people hours of life and a wad of cash to compete, and it's possible to undo the latter and ease the first. It doesn't sound like a non-issue if we consider districts sometimes getting inhabited by people sharing culture, religion etc, so having a shitty or expensive transport connection to that exact area basically means they have less opportunity to work\study\shop\whatever in the city center. 300 billions is what it'd likely cost to transit a couple of russian states to public transportation miracle as an experiment, this includes buyout of a leaser, renewing public fleet of vehicles, upping wages in that sphere so it becomes a place to compete for, compensating the lack of revenue (like it has some lol) and building a charging infrastructure with a sane distance between charging posts. Ah, and they buyout of private cars into that leasing to reduce the amount of them.

One point to consider though is that this dream is kinda unneeded in the current climate because gvnmt tracking all your car rides is exactly what you wouldn't like. Right now speedcams is a less optimal way they track everyone, and giving them an actual GPS data would trivialize surveiliance.

[–] Dasus 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

First off, whilst it might seem selfish, I'd get my personal shit fixed up, would take at most 50k and if I bought some apartment house to own as well, maybe a few hundred k on top.

Okay now I'm settled and healthy. Start making a media company. Hire some great talent. Hire some video game designers, politicians. Essentially start a very weird sort of studio.

Then a sort of a think-thank, a little bit. Focusing on what would be the most efficient ways of approaching systemic change. (I've tons of ideas already for those meets, notebooks full. Not too organised, I'm unafraid, and it's hard to start reasoning them here due to the char limit of 10k).

Start a foundation, a league of some sorts. What I mean by that is have some sort of guiding ideology, a very rough and not too ideologically narrow, but also definitely what would be called leftist in traditional terms.

Then te work starts. Charity projects where they're the most efficient, so they'll have the largest effect. What that means will take a few comments to argue I'd wager.

Start promoting cooperation and whatnot. Fund streamers who join the league, so that for instance some streamers traveling in a poor country would have the ability to access the funds of the foundation to for instance help build some infra for a tiny village which will take away 50% of their travel time or work load or something, giving that community a better chance to grow.

So all these hundreds if not thousands of streamers going around the world, and if bigger infra projects are needed, the foundation can help with those as well. Like building some huge solar power/water distillation plants.

Just building from the ground up.

But that wouldn't help jack shit with political issues we currently have. That requires another plan I have. Except if the league was also on point with what's going on in local politics said places and could promote change with the amount of influence it had, when directed to smaller political entities it might be enough to sort of clean them od corrupt people as well if there is a democratic process of some sort at least.

Like using the foundations entire population to focus on some minor local election should overwhelm it. Do that enough and there's a substantial effect. Maybe

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] maniii 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As in Bounty toilet paper?

A bidet would be better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Shutting off Twitter would cost what, $1?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Hire a competent hitman pronto. We can still prevent the dark age.

[–] Chip_Rat 3 points 1 week ago

Practical and hardly any fun, I'd start looking for a local charity I trust. I have one in mind but I'd get a lawyer and hire a couple experts I trust on charity management and basically private detective them.

Once I had one charity I was happy with I'd start feeding it what it needs. In this example, it's a local food bank style community center, so I could blow that place up with maybe 10 million.

I'd be fairly involved for the next 6-12 months as things got going, while also researching and finding the next, larger scale charities. Most of the money would sit in fairly safe investment accounts and depending on what I learned over the first 1-2 years I'd try and have it all out into the world within 15 years.

When I signed the last cheque for the last couple million, I'd hope to have a coalition of well funded, well run charities all over the world that would have the cashflow to maintain their new service levels and the oversight to continue that good work for the next 100 years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Make my own monopoly and use that fund to make non profits instead

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I really like the idea to Fund a global election. Of a global government to act on global problems. Politics is not a zero sum game.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Build houses

Not a shit ton

Just as many as I can build that are high quality and easily maintainable

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Don't forget to reserve a bit to fund all the bribes, lobbying and legal representation that protecting your housing development will require. 300b is a tasty target.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I would probably just feed as many hungry people for as long as possible.

load more comments
view more: next ›