this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
334 points (98.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26874 readers
3500 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 44 minutes ago

Wow, they really took their logo from sexy, fast and expensive looking, to looking like an over priced soft drink?

That's impressive, haha.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

GUys I'm from ~~2040~~ 2035, here's Microsoft's logo

MS corporate comms army did a sik job getting across those inscrutable monolith vibes, I bet when it launched they all clapped (even though clapping is in performance reviews)

BONUS: heres Amazon, Faceberg and Nvideo too (yay diversity)

spoiler

[–] FauxPseudo 38 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I would have failed every design class I took in college if I submitted that. Why such wide kerning? Why lower case but upper G? Why so round? Why so completely unreadable at a distance because of micro serifs? There isn't one good design element in this.

[–] Asidonhopo 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think they want people to focus on the "agua" and the j and r are just little accents on it like its word art rather than a logo. Like, I literally picture the marketing weirdos at the meeting going off like this.

[–] FauxPseudo 4 points 3 hours ago

The "a" is the worst part for me. You can't see those little stubbs at a distance. So it reads JoGuor at a distance. They didn't just fail to create a good logo, they failed to preserve the name. One bit of advice I always give is "imagine this logo on the back of a golf card or a Pride brochure. If the logo isn't crisp and readable in black and white in a 1/2 inch square then it sucks." This design fails that test. Not just because of the messed up "a" but the wide spacing makes those unreadable "a"s even smaller than if the letters weren't so widely spaced.

[–] nepenthes 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

It doesn't say "car" at all either; no elegance or prestige. The old logo was sexy. New one looks like a logo for bottled water or something.

Edit: it's like going from James Bond to Austin Powers.

[–] hakunawazo 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Austin Powers has style. Crazy 60s style but style.

[–] nepenthes 2 points 3 hours ago

Ya, I wanted to use a bland spy but there aren't any-- I was going to use the Spy vs Spy guys because they are the most generic-looking, but ultimately I kept Powers because while he is stylish and fun, he is also really immature and the logo looks immature to me.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I fucking hate this minimalist design trend more than it is probably reasonable to hate an aesthetic. It's got the personality of unfinished drywall.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The younger generation barely reads let alone reads cursive. This is next generation marketing you aren't the audience I imagine.

[–] Asidonhopo 1 points 3 hours ago

That's what it is, isn't it. Retirement in their design department, new hires and this is a Millenial message marketing to Gen Zers (and Alphas too, automotive preference starts early)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 hours ago

Honestly I think unfinished drywall has more personality. It’s utilitarian and rough around the edges, without the shiny surface veneer.

That new Jaguar logo is like somebody took a beautiful old house full of exposed brick and wood work and put a coating of white paint over everything.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 12 hours ago (3 children)
[–] RememberTheApollo_ 4 points 5 hours ago

All these minimalist labels save .0005¢ every time they’re printed, probably even more on promo booths, banners, and the like.

[–] Viking_Hippie 42 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Better:

  • Revolut (though a fintech company named after a revolution lacking the charge at the end is still moronic in several ways)
  • airbnb (from awful to meh)
  • Spotify (same)

Worse:

  • Pinterest (original fit the platform and what it is/was pretty much perfectly. Current is meh)
  • eBay (both are bad IMO, but at least the original was bad in a playful and eye-catching way. The new one is just more meh
  • Burberry (the stag was notable and signalled a history of old-fashioned quality that's suitably rugged. The new one is meh AND insecure about people knowing which London they're from)
  • Rimova (yet another fashion brand apparently afraid of being noticed
  • DF (from one of the best and most fashion-appropriate logos to an absolute eyesore and kerning nightmare that invites vandalism)
  • Jaguar (From absolutely iconic and great in every way to even uglier than the new DF one. I hope whomever came up with that got both fired and beaten and I'm a pacifist.)

The rest just go from meh to slightly different meh 🤷

[–] naught101 18 points 11 hours ago

I liked the old aibnb one.

Microsoft went from "boring with a bit of attitude" to just plain boring

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago

DF gets points dedacted for missing the ü dots on both, looks absolutely stupid to a german speaker

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] electric 25 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Those old fashion logos are actually sick. Concerning that an industry that sells style would make these their logos.

[–] naught101 13 points 11 hours ago

Except eBay, that was always trash.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago

I wonder how much correlation there is between logo blandification and being owned by giant corporations.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 hours ago

You were supposed to remove the text...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Tata cat.

Insiders might get it.

[–] Thrashy 2 points 5 hours ago
[–] Agent641 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

Could JOGUOR become the new KN?

[–] HerrVorragend 62 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Top looks like it belongs on a nice sports car.

Bottom looks like you can find it on a new Multipla.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That font is awful. The G looks completely unrelated to any of the other letters.

[–] BlitzoTheOisSilent 23 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The G looks completely unrelated to any of the other letters.

I see this, since half of the letters appear to be uppercase, and the other half lowercase:

JaGUar

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver 13 points 14 hours ago

Bottom text looks like it belongs on some short-lived product for flavoring water or a gas station energy drink.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 75 points 15 hours ago

"We're a tech company now!" logo

[–] [email protected] 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I love how the new logo could be literally done in less than a minute on fucking microsoft office. They didn't even bother with a cool looking font, just generic curvy shit

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure they spent an unreasonable amount of time getting that ugly font look just right.

[–] The_v 1 points 6 hours ago

It cost at last 50 million in a fancy name designer fees.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 14 hours ago (8 children)

Somewhere in Jaguar HQ, a marketing firm convinced the CxO suite that the most pressing problem facing the company was that the logo was wrong. So, in the interests of the shareholders they write off the goodwill value of the existing brand and dump millions of euro into this.

[–] slaacaa 12 points 13 hours ago
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 13 hours ago

It takes a heroic amount of cocaine to make something so devoid of taste and see it through.

[–] slaacaa 10 points 13 hours ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 13 hours ago

I dont understand modern logos principles. How tf is that recognizable. Also animals are fun. Stop getting rid of animals from icons.

[–] naught101 5 points 11 hours ago
[–] FelixCress 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Changing things for sake of changing things. Like Microsoft with every moronic "update".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

They kindly did the needful with the logo.

load more comments
view more: next ›