FelixCress

joined 7 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FelixCress 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Sorry, you crossed the line when you made a ad hominem attack.

What ad hominem, sweetie? Asking if you are a USian? I explained why. Asking if you are a little bit slow? Your lack of understanding of two simple words certainly points that way.

[–] FelixCress 35 points 3 hours ago

That reminds me of a hard working billionaire story:

"How I made my first million:

When I was a kid, we were poor. One day my dad gave me 20 pence. I went to the market and bought an apple. I polished it with my shirt, presented nicely and sold for 40 pence.

Next day I bought two apples and did the same. On Saturday I already had sixteen apples and I knew my future was bright. On Sunday my aunt Sophia died and left me £1.5m"

[–] FelixCress 0 points 6 hours ago

It's a limit, not a target, and certainly not a floor

It depends what it is. In some nations limits are reasonable and therefore obeyed while in others they are way too low and therefore commonly ignored.

Too strict laws like this lead to people disregarding it. Even worse, it may even lead to other sections of the same subject law being disregarded, because if it is commonly acknowledged that one section of specific law is ridiculous, why not the others.

[–] FelixCress 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

"the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas"

That also applies to incorrect information ideas... or... lies.

Are you a little bit slow?

Which part of "information" or "ideas" cover lies?

So, are you a USian as misunderstanding of free speach is common there?

[–] FelixCress 3 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

Again it is not.

Neither of those links suggested that it was illegal to lie

Which part of "the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas" caused you trouble?

So, are you a USian?

[–] FelixCress 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yes, but in this case we are not talking about a lie, we are talking about an opinion which you yourself consider a lie.

You are going around in circles. I already told you it is fair enough - if he genuinely believed Muskler was not performing a nazi salute, it just makes him deluded. I however consider it unlikely, and if it indeed is not the case, that means he was lying.

Furthermore, Muskler himself never denied him making a nazi salute, making people denying it even more likely to lie rather than simply being mistaken.

[–] FelixCress 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (12 children)

Again, it is.

Again, it isn't. Read the fucking definition and educate yourself.

'Freedom of speech is the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, by any means.'

https://www.amnesty.org.uk/free-speech-freedom-expression-human-right

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

And, no, I'm not Asian,

Who was talking about Asians? I asked if you are a USian. Someone from USA. People from USA often misunderstand what freedom of speech is.

[–] FelixCress 2 points 9 hours ago

So where was this one coming from now?

[–] FelixCress 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

freedom of speech is for everyone, not only the people you like

Where is this one coming from now?

[–] FelixCress 4 points 9 hours ago (16 children)

Freedom of speech is also the freedom to lie

Again, it is not. Freedom of speech is a freedom to receive information and exchange ideas. Not a freedom to lie.

Are you a USian by any chance? They quite often misunderstand what freedom of speech is.

[–] FelixCress 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (4 children)

Honestly, that's very insulting and I don't appreciate the insinuation.

All I would say is that you picked up a very odd example to defend the "freedom of speech".

 
 
 
 
51
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by FelixCress to c/opisafuckingidiot
 

 
 
-6
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by FelixCress to c/carnivore
 

This time we will never find out what vegans said as it apparently wasn't vegan enough so they were quickly censored by another vegan.

 

Schnitzel is thinnly cut breaded slice of meat, usually veal or pork, fried and traditionally served with some potatoes.

It is mouth-watering tasty!

Pound meat of choice (pork, veal, chicken, turkey, beef)

Sprinkle with salt and pepper;

Coat in flour, dredge in egg, coat in breadcrumbs

Fry until golden (not deep fry! Just shallow fry!)

You can serve it as is, just with a squeeze of lemon or you can add some potatoes on the side.

https://www.recipetineats.com/schnitzel/

-7
submitted 2 weeks ago by FelixCress to c/carnivore
 

Eating animals is comparable to nazi holocaust and if you feel offended by this comparison, that's because you are prejudiced against animals (and "animal liberation", whatever it is).

Certainly, it would be viciously circular to assume that animal liberation is mistaken from the start, which makes a comparison offensive, and which in turn is supposed to prove that animal liberation is wrong. I conclude that if all other objections against animal liberation fail, objecting to the Holocaust comparison by itself will not indicate the case for anti-animal liberation. I submit the possibility that some people are deeply offended by the comparison because they are profoundly prejudiced against animals

https://lemmy.world/post/144597

view more: next ›