this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
581 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3799 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EndOfLine 175 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 month ago

Aww I miss r/TrumpCriticizesTrump

Thank you for this 🙂

[–] [email protected] 123 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Felon Says People Who Criticize Supreme Court Justices Should Be Jailed

FTFY

and nearly the next post sorted by new:

Trump Faces Renewed Scrutiny Over Allegations of Raping a 13-Year-Old Girl

[–] MrVilliam 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Felon-Running-For-President Who Promised To Be A Dictator Wants Your First Amendment Right Violated

Even better headline.

[–] JustZ 4 points 1 month ago

The media is complicit.

[–] Lost_My_Mind 2 points 1 month ago

I knew before I even clicked the topic that it would be pointless to get excited over the idea of poinhing this out.

You're the only human commenter, and thats the comment. It's such obvious bullshit that I KNEW someone was going to beat me to it.

[–] themeatbridge 62 points 1 month ago

Convicted Felon argues against the Bill of Rights.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The scary part is not that this idiot says these things

The scary part is that he has a well funded following

Drump is only part of the problem

The other part of the problem are the millionaire and billionaire backers that keep this circus of the insane moving.

[–] timewarp 15 points 1 month ago

The scary part is that he has enough extremist followers in law enforcement & sitting judges that it is possible they'd claim an interpretation of the law in someway where it actually happens.

[–] BreadstickNinja 40 points 1 month ago

Alito is a rancid cyst on American democracy. Jail me, clown.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Blatant fascism from the GOP nominee? Who would have guessed?

Yes, Trump is a problem. But the problem runs deeper.

If not Trump, another useful idiot.

[–] tacosplease 6 points 1 month ago

Useful-er probably. If they can get the votes.

Here's to hoping the bag of rats eats itself long enough for the Republican party to split.

[–] barsquid 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Second Amendment fans who say that their guns are to defend the other rights will actually do nothing about this clear and present danger to the First Amendment.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

will actually do nothing

Even worse, they're cheering it on.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

as of August 2024, 55% of Americans actively disapprove. of the Supreme Court enough to voice their criticism on a poll.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/approval/supreme-court/

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

Truly the avatar of free speech right there.

[–] jaybone 20 points 1 month ago

The Supreme Court is no longer part of the checks and balances it is supposed to be. It is now controlled by MAGA. Along with half of Congress. So that only leaves the White House now.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sweaty and gross and nervous.

Off-putting face.

[–] samus12345 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Sam_Bass 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] beanlink 3 points 1 month ago

Dude went from Fritos original to Chili cheese flavor.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

We should run this by each of them and ask what they think, then remove any who agree

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Of course any Magoo will just defend this as "ThAtS nOt WhAt He MeAnT! He SaId It'S aBoUt InFlUeNcInG tHeM!"

To be honest I kinda hope they do take that defense. Could be a nice time to bring up all the ~~bribes~~ gifts to conservative SCOTUS "justices."

[–] ATDA 14 points 1 month ago

While I explain to family for the thousandth time Facebook fact checks, even if biased, aren't a first amendment issue ..

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Yeah, let me guess, the convicted felon also thinks he shouldn't be punished. If there is someone's opinion that is less valuable on this topic, I don't know who it might be. He literally wants to protect his cronies from prosecution so they cam protect him. Blatant public corruption on a scale rarely seen in this country. Dare I say Putinesque? Yeah, that's pretty apropos.

[–] Treczoks 12 points 1 month ago

And I say they should be praised!

[–] frazw 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why stop at the supreme Court. Maybe all judges should have this "protection".

Oh wait but then Donnie would be in jail.

Just be honest Don. You want to jail anyone who disagrees with you.

[–] AshMan85 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Next, people that criticise him

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure he already said that

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The supreme court are an bunch of hacks! Come get me.

[–] barsquid 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Boofer and Corrupt Clarence are both rapists. See you in jail, my friend.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'ma learn law while behind bars and appeal to the Supreme Court myself. Then when I make my argument in front of them I'm just going to cuss those assholes out.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don’t think Supreme Court works that way not sure you’d get to be there let alone talk.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If I'm representing myself, who else would be there?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can’t really do that at supreme court

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Freeze Peach!!!

[–] Sam_Bass 3 points 1 month ago

tell him to stop putting clowns in judicial robes and we might respect them more

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Pot calling the kettle black?

Is he asking to get himself jailed?

From https://www.theregreview.org/2020/08/10/coglianese-dissing-supreme-court/

"These horrible & politically charged decisions coming out of the Supreme Court are shotgun blasts into the face of people that are proud to call themselves Republicans or Conservatives.”

and

“Do you get the impression that the Supreme Court doesn’t like me?”

[–] Maggoty 1 points 1 month ago

Oh joy lese majeste laws