timewarp

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] timewarp 1 points 9 hours ago

Yes he said something along the lines of it needs to be fixed cause it disagreed with him.

[–] timewarp 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That isn't illegal

[–] timewarp 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So what law did he break? The approaching the city council law?

[–] timewarp 5 points 11 hours ago

Remember when you were little & thought someone would arrest the President if they were ever compromised by a foreign country?

[–] timewarp 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Well good news if they are successful in their arguments it can set precedent to make piracy legal.

[–] timewarp 1 points 16 hours ago

I think the closest you can come is open source an entire business, from business plans, architecture, systems, payment processing, etc.

[–] timewarp 1 points 1 day ago

Prob at least 50k knowing Kia. Even then I'm guessing the tech will be lagging behind considerably.

[–] timewarp 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Have you experienced this yourself?

[–] timewarp 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe you should stop being one then

[–] timewarp 4 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Buttholes can suck?

[–] timewarp 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Of course, most people would recognize that the laws concerning the transportation of people without seats or seatbelts applies to ALL vehicles and only a completely disingenuous fuckwit would focus on the U-Haul part.

Not wearing a seatbelt in the back of a truck isn't an arrestable offense, nor against the law in almost half the states. What if they were seated & wearing safety harnesses? You can always call the Lincoln Heights police & ask for clarification or to lodge a complaint if their safety is a big priority to you.

Another thing that only a disingenuous fuckwit would do is try to equate literal, flag-waving Nazis specifically trying to incite hatred and fear towards minorities with all other public gatherings.

I didn't, but what I said were things that upsets people. Abortion upsets people where pro-lifers believe it is murder. Supporting Palestine upsets people where pro-Israelis believe it is supporting terrorists. Just because something doesn't upset you, doesn't mean it doesn't upset other people. Clearly you get upset very easily. Are you not able to regulate your emotions or did you forget to take your meds?

And pretty much all the examples you gave have a history of police breaking them up for precisely the reasons I listed, but the cops didn’t lift a finger here

You didn't cite any cases, so if you want to make a point then link to some legal cases and I'll cross-check them with similar cases.

I don’t type this for you, because you already know you’re full of shit.

You failed to provide any evidence or cite a single case. All you do is scream like your parents took away your Xbox. You typed this to try to prove to yourself that you're way more intelligent than all the attorneys, legal scholars, amicus curiae's, judges, etc. that have already litigated matters like this, which I argue are way more beneficial to causes you might actually care about if you'd listen & stop screeching. Were you never taught any coping mechanisms or do you not know how to do legal research? Nothing gets done by screaming.

Almost everything you've said indicates to me you're a fascist. You want to censor people that non-violently expresses opinions you don't like, you don't care about the rule of law and you don't see other humans that offend you as being anything more than "a worthless waste of oxygen."

 

This lawsuit was filed with Plaintiffs being the States' of New Mexico, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont & Washington. It requests both declaratory & injunctive relief.

What needs to happen is if a federal judge makes a ruling & Musk ignores it, then he needs to be held in contempt & jailed until he complies. In which case they will immediately appeal, likely to try to get it to the Supreme Court. If Supreme Court says Musk can do whatever he wants then you know it is time to organize for succession.

 

Google Gemini seems to have been programmed to provide cookie cutter responses when asked questions about whether Trump tried to overturn the election.

When you point it out to Gemini, it says it isn't programmed to avoid any topics or viewpoints.

Even saying you'll accept a variety of sources & viewpoints on the topic to reach your own conclusion, results in it saying it can't answer.

When asking if it has been trained on research papers, case law, indexed news stories & even Wikipedia results, it says that it has.

37
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by timewarp to c/enoughmuskspam
 

Elon Musk was forced to admit that Grok sucks donkey balls today, of which he also has a penchant for the equestrian variety, like the time Musk offered a SpaceX flight attendant a horse that he had been inseminating believing he could create a Centaur.

He expressed to the world he sucks at creating companies, and is only capable of buying them. He made this statement when he said that even for close to 100 billion dollars wouldn't be enough for his team of incels to compete with ChatGPT-AI, led by sister-molester Sam Altman. Recently a Chinese company called DeepSeek was able to match ChatGPT for less than 10 million dollars, and without the need of a sister-molester.

4
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by timewarp to c/politicaldiscussion
 

Since “President” Musk isn’t even an elected government official and has a history of drug abuse, erratic behavior, narcissism, and child abuse… why won’t Democrats try to get one of the federal judges they appointed to issue an involuntary psych hold on him, like on a Friday evening… where they have him get drug tested & evaluated to see if he should be breaking into classified government systems, or if he’s been fueling up on ketamine again & snorting the addy’s or coke with his daddy role model.

Federal judges are lifetime appointments. The only people that can remove them are Congress & it requires impeachment with 2/3 just like the President. Essentially, if Democrats agree on this, there is no way the judge will get impeached as a result.

 

@gnukeith on X, a @Brave + $BAT Ambassador specifically chosen by Brave is now promoting far-right extremists on X.

Brave CEO, Brendan Eich, was previously ousted from his role as CEO of Mozilla, after it was found that he had donated to Prop 8, a campaign in California aimed at banning gay marriage. Despite Brendan Eich claiming at the time that he regrets his decision, he has since made multiple social media posts defending his anti-gay position.

At some point people must decide whether they wish to ditch the Fox, as Brave started advertising to users searching up Firefox on the Google Play Store, or if they want to ditch the anti-LGBTQ+ browser.

 
 

I received my ballot a week ago and I couldn't bring myself to fill it out yet. I'm scared of another Trump presidency if that is what happens, but I can't keep supporting Democrats that have become what they claim to hate. I know if I vote for her that I'm sending a message that they can keep using the same playbook to move closer to fascism and corporatocracy.

They use their influence & power to eliminate opposition, and their donor money to astroturf social media. They censor other voices online, and spread lies about other people (Jill Stein) without evidence. They gaslight and claim you're fascist for telling the truth and blame others for their mistakes. They'll use your money to pay for genocide while turning a blind eye to help themselves, but make a thousand excused why they can't help you.

They don't deserve to win. Trump will be bad and I'm scared about what will happen if he wins, but you and I are not to blame. All they had to do was be truthful, transparent, empathetic and genuine—but their lust for power got in the way.

146
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by timewarp to c/politics
 

This is an unpopular opinion, and I get why – people crave a scapegoat. CrowdStrike undeniably pushed a faulty update demanding a low-level fix (booting into recovery). However, this incident lays bare the fragility of corporate IT, particularly for companies entrusted with vast amounts of sensitive personal information.

Robust disaster recovery plans, including automated processes to remotely reboot and remediate thousands of machines, aren't revolutionary. They're basic hygiene, especially when considering the potential consequences of a breach. Yet, this incident highlights a systemic failure across many organizations. While CrowdStrike erred, the real culprit is a culture of shortcuts and misplaced priorities within corporate IT.

Too often, companies throw millions at vendor contracts, lured by flashy promises and neglecting the due diligence necessary to ensure those solutions truly fit their needs. This is exacerbated by a corporate culture where CEOs, vice presidents, and managers are often more easily swayed by vendor kickbacks, gifts, and lavish trips than by investing in innovative ideas with measurable outcomes.

This misguided approach not only results in bloated IT budgets but also leaves companies vulnerable to precisely the kind of disruptions caused by the CrowdStrike incident. When decision-makers prioritize personal gain over the long-term health and security of their IT infrastructure, it's ultimately the customers and their data that suffer.

view more: next ›