this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
1091 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2958 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

F you, Taylor Swift!” shouted Megyn Kelly, “and f all of the people who want to see these children have body parts chopped off.”

For those not fluent in Republican crazy-speak, Kelly’s meltdown was triggered by Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris the night before, barely one hour after Trump all but face-planted on the debate stage. Kelly was especially triggered by Swift highlighting her appreciation for vice presidential nominee Tim Walz’s support of LGBTQ+ rights.

Other right-wing commentators, like Ben Shapiro, took another approach: making fun of Swifties. “Note: if you vote for a particular candidate because your favorite singer is doing so, please don’t vote. You are too stupid to vote,” wrote Shapiro on X. Meanwhile, Elon Musk, the richest man on the planet, threatened to impregnate her.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kamenlady 299 points 3 months ago (12 children)

“F you, Taylor Swift!” shouted Megyn Kelly, “and f all of the people who want to see these children have body parts chopped off.”

Weird

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Plopp 189 points 3 months ago (4 children)

“and f all of the people who want to see these children have body parts chopped off.”

As someone living in a country whey we don't chop off the foreskin of little children, whereas conservative Americans love that chopping procedure, I find this statement slightly amusing.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 63 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not just little children, infants.

[–] WhatAmLemmy 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Babies. They mutilate the genitals of their babies because they believe their god desires it.

It's called mental illness. These people aren't simply "weird". They're insane, a danger to their children, their communities, and their country.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago (10 children)

But that's how you show God that your baby deserves to be in Heaven!!!

🌭🪓✝️

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lauchs 132 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Republicans: Cancel culture is ruining the country!

Also Republicans: You endorsed Harris? Kiss your Republican record sales goodbye!

[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 months ago (8 children)

The hypocrisy is a feature

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck 126 points 3 months ago (1 children)

... Ben Shapiro accusing other people of not being smart enough to vote.....

He should practice what he preaches and not vote, himself.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (10 children)

He should vote, because everyone should vote.

Fuck Ben Shapiro, he's some combination of idiot and willing stooge, but voting only works when everyone gets to vote. Unlike these right-wing fuckwits, I'm not willing to disenfranchise voters just because I perceive them as being less intelligent than me.

EDIT: I am shocked that supporting a fair and equal democracy seems to be at least sort of controversial around here. If you genuinely believe a given category of people should be disallowed from voting, please reconsider your values.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] pivot_root 120 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Elmo basically threatened to rape her... Shitbag.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DandomRude 103 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Once again, we see what the debate between Harris and Trump illustrated very clearly: The GOP in its current state is not pursuing any program whatsoever, but merely builds up imaginary enemy stereotypes that they blame for all their problems - without any even halfway factual reasons. Democratic processes are impossible with this tedious kindergarten approach because they are based on factual arguments, cooperation and the willingness to find common ground. I sincerely hope that there are some rational thinking conservatives left who will refuse to vote for this hateful orange moron and his ridiculous henchmen.

[–] CitizenKong 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it's almost as if all their talking points and strategies are fed to them by a hostile foreign power that wants to destabilize its enemy. Weird.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] paf0 99 points 3 months ago (10 children)

I hate their "children's body parts chopped off" bit. Most doctors won't do until they're 18 and even then the number of people who do it is miniscule compared to the overall population or the rest of the LGBT community. Imagine being so uncomfortable in your own skin that you decide that's your best option. Have some ducking compassion, Megyn.

[–] withabeard 76 points 3 months ago

Unless it's circumcision for religious reasons ... then chopping off body parts is A'OK.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 3 months ago

These are the same people who, faced with an obviously intersex newborn, would 100% surgically mutilate the baby to fit in a binary ASAP without thinking twice.

It never is and never was about protecting children.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 98 points 3 months ago (23 children)

If they didn't want her to voice her opinion they shouldn't have spent a week making fake ai images of her endorsing Trump. They forced her hand; she could either allow her likeness to be appropriated for a political cause she doesn't agree with, or make her true opinion known.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 91 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Is Megyn Kelly really against circumcision now or something?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Mostly_Gristle 85 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Did I miss the news cycle where Democrats started dismembering children?

[–] metallic_substance 87 points 3 months ago (9 children)

You're probably just not consuming the right batshit crazy conservative echo chamber outlet

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Beefytootz 54 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Leading up to the debate, a whole bunch of new propaganda got pushed. Haitians eating cats in Ohio, Post-birth-abortions, and forced transitions for children, prisoners, and illegal-aliens. Totally normal conspiracy theories based on absolutely nothing

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ultranaut 53 points 3 months ago (11 children)

One of the Republican talking points in this election is that parents are sending their kids to school in the morning and they are coming home with their dicks chopped off in the afternoon because Democrats are performing operations on them to turn them trans. Yes, it is very weird and completely untrue.

[–] Zess 37 points 3 months ago

Conservatives consider this made-up conspiracy more serious than the actual school shootings that leave kids dead every week.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] aquinteros 72 points 3 months ago (12 children)

the richest man in the world "threatened to impregnate her" holy shit what bizarre world we are living in.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago

Yea jesus christ, that's creepy af even for him.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Mobiledecay 65 points 3 months ago (16 children)

The party of rapists, child molesters and murderers is mad at Taylor Swift. She must've done something right. 🤔

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] riodoro1 61 points 3 months ago (20 children)

Imagine living in the US 💀

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] billiam0202 59 points 3 months ago (2 children)

“F you, Taylor Swift!” shouted Megyn Kelly, “and f all of the people who want to see these children have body parts chopped off.”

You guys remember the time Donald Trump accused this same woman who is now hysterically defending him of "blood coming out of her wherever" because she had the audacity to ask him about his sexism?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] p3n 59 points 3 months ago (14 children)

The argument that "you shouldn't vote for someone just because your favorite celebrity endorses them" seemed like a much more credible argument before the 2016 election when the winning candidate essentially won by literally being a celebrity.

Prior to 2016, Trump was probably best known for being the host of a reality TV show, and being a "businessman". Taylor Swift is definitely better known, and you could also make a solid argument that she is a better "businessman" as well.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] ladicius 58 points 3 months ago (3 children)

They are... I don't know how to say it... weird? Could that be an appropriate term? I don't know.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zeppo 50 points 3 months ago (3 children)

On the flip side, imagine voting for someone because Ben Shapiro is doing so.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MedicPigBabySaver 46 points 3 months ago

Celebrities have every right to voice their opinion on national issues.

And, that is not a "zero risk" position.

A recent example is the formerly known: "Dixie Chicks". Research their dilemma.

And in the past, late 1940's, Hollywood had a "Blacklist" which was a very serious shit list which fucked over plenty of people.

Many American celebrities are also citizens with every right to voice their opinion the same as your lawn sign or bumper sticker. Yet, sometimes, it's a really good thing when those celebrities rally their groupies, Swifties, etc.

Like almost always, it boils down to others being jealous of the "power" of other people.

[–] hOrni 46 points 3 months ago (12 children)

I must admit that I don't get, why it's such a big deal, that Taylor Swift supports Harris. But seeing the meltdown of the right wing grifters does put a smile on my face.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Was anyone on the left that mad when KidRock or Ted Nugent coming out in support of Dump?

No.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek 40 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

I read this morning that the Swift endorsement was not choreographed with the Harris/Walz champaign. They didn't know it would happen until it did. Yet, they turned out and advertised a campaign friendship braclet within an hour. That is excellent digital marketing work.

Edited to add. They also sold out of them in an hour

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pyre 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

not beating the "weird" allegations

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago

Trump threatened her for her endorsement. Anyone who thinks he has any redeeming qualities is beyond redemption.

[–] SkunkWorkz 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

Republicans would lose 2/3 off their voter base if they listened to Ben Shapiro. Like how many voters have become Republican because they listened to their favorite radio DJ or podcaster.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›