this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
344 points (99.1% liked)

politics

18036 readers
4212 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] simplejack 146 points 1 week ago (14 children)

I had to travel to Austin for work a few weeks ago. Got off the plane, checked into the hotel, took a shower, decided to use mother nature’s melatonin to help with the jet lag… then, boom. Upload your driver’s license.

So I had visited some sites that were hosted outside US and didn’t give a fuck about Texas’ stupid laws.

These laws are not only authoritarian, they’re fucking useless.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I assume this is the "small government" party doing this?

(I'm not an American)

[–] FuglyDuck 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Republicans, which yeah. They like to talk about “small government” when it comes to billionaires and taxes, it really, that’s about it.

[–] RealFknNito 10 points 1 week ago

And guns. Can't forget the guns.

[–] TempleSquare 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes. They want "small government" when the law affects them, but "law and order" when it punishes someone else who annoys them.

It's childishness we've come to be accustomed to, thanks to lead-brained 70-year-olds who are falling into legit cognitive decline... but still have the numbers to be a formidable opponent at the polls on election day.

Also, their dicks don't work anymore without a blue pill, so they may as well take away the consensual naked fun of Gen X, Millennial, and Gen Z (18+) people right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ours 5 points 1 week ago

Small so it can sneak into all their citizen's lives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TempleSquare 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's worse: Reputable sites that comply with U.S. laws (such as participants being 18+ and filming of their own free will) are effectively forced out, while questionable site carry on.

The likelyhood of seeing abuse victims or underage in Texas goes up, not down.

If they truly cared about protecting minors, they'd see the flaw in their law and rectify it. Of course, we all know (not through cynicism but cold repeated behavior) that political conservatives do not care about minors and care far more about punishing consenting adults.

This law is a step toward the latter.

[–] FenrirIII 19 points 1 week ago

You: (bring facts and logic)

TX Republicans: "A witch! They're a witch! Burn them!"

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] foggy 92 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Honestly, this feels like a canary in a coalmine. A coalmine that we've known to be on fire, but a canary nonetheless.

12 states total. That's like a quarter of the country.

2025 is gonna be a wild ride..

[–] tmjaea 51 points 1 week ago

Ironically their leader pays porn stars to have sex with him which obviously is not a problem for their voters.

[–] acetanilide 17 points 1 week ago

Just imagine how angry everyone is going to be when they can't masturbate the pain of Present Day away

[–] werefreeatlast 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ok What is the canary wearing?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Oh step-canary!

[–] just_another_person 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I believe it's just stuck in the dryer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Allonzee 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Enjoy that freedom!

Never lost that backwards, repressed, puritanical, "we come to the new world to be more dogmatic" prude streak.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Banning porn nationwide is part of Project 2025's plan. defeatproject2025.org

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Republicans plotting in the open to install an authoritarian theocracy? Sounds serious!

So when will democrats drop gun control considering this imminent threat?

Armed queers bash back.

SocialistRA.org

[–] madcaesar 44 points 1 week ago

Conservatism / Religiosity is a plague that's been retarding our species since the dawn of man.

[–] WhatIsThePointAnyway 42 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This is part one of the religious rights plan to go after porn sites and their patrons. Don’t give them your ID. If they get power, it will come back on you.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Nightwingdragon 41 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Funny thing is....do people think Pornhub is the only porn site on the internet or something? That if they make Pornhub shut down that all the porn will magically disappear? Fucking LOL. Sure, there's a good idea guys. It's not like there aren't a billion other porn sites on the internet that couldn't give a shit less about US age verification laws.

All this will do is drive people away from the most popular porn sites that at least have something in place even if it isn't very good and drive them to any number of other sites where they'll pick up all sorts of malware on their devices and probably finding even more of the porn-of-questionable-legality that these bills were meant to stifle in the first place.

Fire hot, water wet, teenagers are gonna find porn. It's embedded in their DNA. Don't believe me? Ask any teenager in the 80s about going into the woods to find a stash of porn magazines. We weren't told this shit. It's just like we...knew. Basic instinct. We somehow just knew there was porn in the woods and on scrambled cable TV channels at like 4 in the morning. Porn is eternal. And as long as it's out there, teenagers are going to find it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Pornhub is just good about making news about them, raises their profile and perception as the main porn site.

[–] LowtierComputer 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not just pornhub. There are already a handful of others closing off service as well.

[–] Nightwingdragon 22 points 1 week ago

And for each one of those, two that don't give a shit about age verification will pop up to take it's place. Pornhub could close today and it would be replaced with hubofporn and pornohubs dot com by lunchtime, hosted in some country like the Isle of Man or something.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dantheclamman 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ChonkyOwlbear 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More of a stampede than a creep these days.

[–] dantheclamman 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, I worry we're entering the exponential curve, with the new effort to put ten commandments in schools

[–] ChonkyOwlbear 2 points 6 days ago

And the growing LGBT hate. And the potential revival of the Comstock act. And the attempts at banning artificial insemination and contraception....

[–] cmoney 34 points 1 week ago

Oh yes the same Republicans that want to save the children also want to marry them..

[–] Paraponera_clavata 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A blog post from Pornhub said that its latest locations for shutdowns are Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky and Nebraska. The site said it would end operations in those states in July 2024. The website closed in Texas last week, and has also blocked access to its site in Arkansas, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, Utah, and Virginia in response to similar state legislation.

[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not surprised to see any of those states on the list.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mercano 15 points 1 week ago
[–] TheBigBrother 15 points 1 week ago

Time to invest in VPN companies..

[–] BaronVonBort 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As far as they know I’m from the Netherlands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arin 9 points 1 week ago

vpn stonks go up

[–] xc2215x 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

XVideos will get more popular.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I just tested with my VPN and indeed xvideos doesn't give a shit if you're in Texas.

The A record for xvideos resolves to the Netherlands so that's probably why they don't give a shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarbecueCowboy 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So, I have a pretty alright VPN provider, but I've been looking for a self-hosted solution to allow me to say "Hey, if you're trying to hit www.domain.com, go through this VPN tunnel instead" but still run everything else straight through. Lots of options exist, I have one that would be perfect that we utilize at my company, but I haven't found a good solution that doesn't utilize enterprise level pricing.

Anyone got any tips on that front?

[–] RazorsLedge 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You can use foxyproxy (browser extension) with SOCKS5 proxies to ssh tunnels to various hosts based on the URL pattern. Maybe too kludgey for your use case.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Tinyproxy

https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/releases

Free Open source Upstream Http/s, socks4/5, direct redirection per site/URL/domain with regex. Can set default upstream proxy for everything else.

Invisible proxy Reverse proxy

Command line / simple text config

It's in your distros repo

It's available in termux.

It works.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›