this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
911 points (98.7% liked)

News

21721 readers
3571 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Elon Musk accused of illegally selling $7.5 billion in Tesla stock in Q4 2022.
  • Lawsuit alleges Musk and board violated fiduciary duties by selling shares ahead of disappointing vehicle sales data.
  • Shareholder seeks disgorgement of $3 billion in illegal gains and damages from directors for reckless behavior.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePantser 283 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

Isn't that the definition of insider trading? Lock him up like Martha, she did way less and served time in a prison resort.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I need to look up how "insider trading" even works.

When you are the CEO, and you make decisions, and you own your own stock - wouldn't everything you ever do be with insider info? It is just honor system pinky-promise to act in good faith? I mean that sounds super effective.

[–] [email protected] 109 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Normally you publicly say looong in advance, like at least half a year in advance, that you plan to sell this amount of shares at this point in time. No more, no less, not earlier, not later, no backsies.

[–] Warl0k3 62 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Well no, there is backsies. You can rescind your intent to sell within a couple days. What most CEOs do is set up regular sells every month way in advance, then choose not to sell unless its opportune at the last minute. If that sounds like it completely defeats the purpose of the rule in the first place, yep! The system is rigged.

[–] CleoTheWizard 17 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Wouldn’t say completely. The notice of intent to sell is not there to prevent CEOs from selling when they want to, it’s to notify you that they could sell this much if they wanted to.

The purpose is just to say that you need to be prepared for a potential sale. If the CEO keeps backing out of a sale, that does hurt your ability to predict when they will but not how much they could sell and therefore how much those sales could potentially affect your investment.

All of that is strategic because otherwise investors could conceivably do the opposite and sell before the CEO is forced to sell and then buy his shares at a lower price. That would mean the stock would tank every time the CEO went to sell. The problem exists because most of the solutions are even worse

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

At my workplace we are only allowed to sell stocks within certain windows, usually it's a brief period immediately after we publicly release earnings. I think for higher ups it's even more restrictive.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName 22 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

We had a 2 week window 2 or 3 days after earnings were released.

Edit: You could preschedule sales though like recurring once a month, but it wouldn't take effect immediately. I can't remember what the delay on that was, but it might have been starting after the next earnings?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 19 points 4 weeks ago

"Felonious Musk" might be a good nickname.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That's only the 5th time he commits fraud. He has been at court several times because of his actions. It seems no one really wants to arrest him

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 weeks ago

Yes but you see, he is a billionaire... Insider trading and other laws are for the pauper rich

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 122 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Can we revoke his government contracts now?

[–] ThePantser 57 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Dude, you can’t talk about deporting people back to Africa. Not cool.

[–] pennomi 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, that’s counterproductive because the government uses those services. Instead, the government could confiscate his stock in those companies.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

SpaceX would probably be more profitable if they didn't have to spend so much time and resources on preventing Musk from interfering with things.

[–] pennomi 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s mostly Tesla and Twitter that he’s wrecking, but yeah Shotwell does sometimes rescue SpaceX from terrible ideas he has, like canceling Falcon Heavy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen 102 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Martha Stewart this motherfucker.

[–] cosmicrookie 40 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

So.. i vaguelly knew about her so did some searching

she served five months in federal prison for fraud and was released in March 2005. There was speculation that the incident would effectively end her media empire,[2] but in 2005 Stewart began a comeback campaign[3] and her company returned to profitability in 2006.[4] Stewart rejoined the board of directors of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia in 2011[5] and became chairwoman of her namesake company again in 2012

Its pretty mild isn't it?

[–] Fedizen 43 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

except they wont even do that to musk. Nobody wants to try a billionaire in court, musk is known to send armies of private detectives on people. He'll close a factory in your district out of spite. Billionaires are afraid of taxes because as long as they have way too much money they can continue to do the illegal shit that made them rich.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

And she got street cred, and hangs out with snoop dog now lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 100 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

How could a CEO of any company trade his own stock from the company and not be insider trading?

The fact they are allowed to control stock is laughable... At best, stock from the company you control should be in a blind trust (which would still be laughable but we can at least pretend)

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 37 points 4 weeks ago

The SEC has already proved itself absolutely toothless. Even if it was illegal, who would prosecute?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

They have to give advanced notice before selling, they can't just sell stock on the whim.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 weeks ago

It was clearly more profitable to break the law than to follow it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (6 children)

So?... I am the CEO... I know our new line of highly anticipated space tentacle dildos are not going to be in stores by Christmas as expected, I give notice and sell stock before the public finds out and stock goes down

I also know, because of the delay, we are squeezing the Chinese manufacturer, so I will give notice and buy the stock in January knowing we are probably going to offer deep discounts to get those consumers back

How is giving advance notice any safety? unless the rules say they need to give 500 days of notice or something long enough there is no possible way to predict properly with ALL the information and power a CEO would have to manipulate the stock

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t want to defend CEOs here, but there is a code for in the USA, Rule 10b5-1, which sets out a CEOs stock trading plan.

The reason, if you’re not Elon Musk, is that most CEOs are paid in stock and so it’s inevitable they’re going to sell some. So they set out a plan to say I will sell X shares on X date and the market shouldn’t be spooked.

What Elon did here is sell 45 million shares, seemingly outside of any plan, which is insane. Usually they wouldn’t be offloading such a volume.

Selling a small amount of your stock doesn’t indicate you don’t have faith in your own company, but more that you want to convert some of your reward (pay) into actual cash.

I’m not saying the system is good, just that this is how it works.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago

I’m not saying the system is good, just that this is how it works.

Totally get it... which is why my comment was intended to mean "what the fuck kind of system is this"... not "Elon bad"... although, yes, Elon bad ;-)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

This is bullshit. My EV ETF is not doing well and I'm losing my investment while this jagoff gets to sell his stocks ahead of the announcements and runs away with the money? Fuck that shit.

Shareholders should fucking sue if the government ain't gonna arrest him for insider trading.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I wish I knew money enough to actually understand your comment, but here we are, both hating Elon and wanting him dealt with. Its beautiful really.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

An ETF is an investment fund made up of stocks from different companies. A fund based on electric vehicle market could include Tesla, Chevrolet, Toyota, Ford, Kia and various other companies building EV parts like BASF or Northvolt for batteries or chargers.

The fund could be composed of, say, 30% Tesla, 10% Chevrolet, 10% Kia, 5% Ford, etc.

You can invest in the fund by purchasing parts, which then give you a return based on how many parts you bought and the performance of the stocks in the fund.

Does that make sense?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If you're using the ETF as a long term investment and you believe EVs are key to our future then you shouldn't worry about this too much (unless the ETF is made up of mostly TSLA in which case I'd not be too happy).

You've not lost money until you take it out of your investment.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cosmicrookie 77 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

That title is a very long way of saying that he's been accused of inside trade

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 month ago

Forgot the final bullet points

  • US Government does jack shit in terms of legal ramifications for breaking law.
  • Musk pledges to break US law once again.
[–] Skkorm 41 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That's called Insider Trading, and is supposed to be illegal.

America

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] set_secret 35 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

What a joyous year if we could get Trump and Elon in jail this year.. They could be roomies!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 34 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Neither of them are going to prison. Trump's judge explicitly said as much during his 10th contempt citation, and Musk has been pissing on the leg of the SEC for the last five years straight with no consequences.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Lonnie wouldn't break investing rules. I trust him. He's a super genius and will save us all. Now let me go post racist bullshit on his everything app so people will think I'm cool.

He's a shithead. There will never be meaningful consequences. I hope he takes a rocket into space and never comes back.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] suction 33 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Used to be you pull this shit (insider trading) and be locked away for life. Times they 'r a changing, indeed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] njm1314 23 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

When are Tesla shareholders going to wake up and understand that he's scamming them. You're all dupes and he's going to ride you to the last second and let you all burn.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ballistic_86 22 points 4 weeks ago

Insider trading seems to have been perfectly legal for the last few decades. Nothing will come of this or it would start setting precedent that we could use against our government leaders and other billionaires and federal judges. Not gonna happen.

[–] asteriskeverything 21 points 4 weeks ago

Punish him daddy

[–] PsyDoctah9Jah 13 points 4 weeks ago

.... WHAT'S New in Capitalism......

🫠

[–] HurlingDurling 8 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

So wait, is it OK to do INSIDER TRAIDING now?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SonnyVabitch 7 points 4 weeks ago

Wouldn't that volume for sale appearing on the market decrease the price in and of itself?

load more comments
view more: next ›