Thoughts and prayers
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
202 points (97.6% liked)
News
23402 readers
4477 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Even jesus laughed at this one.
While I wouldn't have wanted to support the place,
a collection of historic Bibles, including William Penn’s own
would have actually been interesting to see. For all the harm done in the name of Christianity, there is also a lot of amazing artwork and historic significance tied up with it. It's just better done in an actual museum and not a religious nutjob propaganda space.
Right? I was telling my wife the other day that I want to see a gallery of all the Jesus pictures that get donated to a Goodwill when a grandma dies.
load more comments
(16 replies)
"Museum"
If it isn't history, it is still art that illicits an emotional reaction from both supporters and detractors. In this case it's like an art museum full of those avant garde shapes that no one understands but some say it speaks to them.
You could just go into a comic book store.
...illicits an emotional reaction from both supporters and detractors...
A bonfire would also accomplish this.
I still get unreasonably annoyed about that damn toilet. Because even the guy who sent it in was just being that pretentious art student who has to turn it into a debate when the layperson says "that's not art, that's a toilet."
Literally the guy submitted it originally to purity test the gallery curators on if they would be "anything can be art" enough for his liking.
It was a literal shit post to start drama with his colleagues and art students are still worshipping the piss he probably christened it the water fountain with decades later.
Because these people can never seem to accept that "this doesn't move me at all, what's eliciting an emotional response is you trying to start a fight with me over it like I'm stupid for not being moved by this." is an entirely valid response to their art.
It's like the baby philosophy students who will go out of their way to verbally assault you for suggesting looking for something to throw on the trolley track instead of agreeing that there is any real moral character to be teased out from the completely realistic and grounded in the real world which animates our real world moral values scenario which involves an infinitely long train track extending into a blank featureless void and a random number of civilians tied to a fork in the track by an unknown force and absolutely nothing in the scenario is present to interact with but a lever which despite all other featurelessness of the scene is somehow able to switch the direction of the fork.
You may have noticed by now that I reserve a special level of ire for wannabe intellectuals who throw a fit when their pop-smart-people references either don't land or turn out to not hold as much intellectual water as they want it to for ego inflating purposes.
load more comments
(1 replies)
These people just don't get it. Very few religious people actually care about the religion. They care about using it to feel better about themselves. They don't read the holy books. To make a place they would want to go to, it would have to have VIP access if you have a letter from your pastor, and be all about how great you are for believing and much better than nonbelievers you are. But I guess the optics on that aren't the same.
Actually reading the damn book for real produces either atheists or screwballs who either abandon church based worship altogether for personal worship or who end up founding a whole new denomination that will go on to be dominated by the people who use religion to feel better about themselves.
I wonder how many needy people could be fed for all that money...
In a statement to The Inquirer on Saturday, the Faith and Liberty Discovery Center cited the pandemic and “structural limitations” as some of the reasons for the closing. A spokesperson for the American Bible Society would not elaborate on the closing beyond that statement.
Or just, yknow, the ineffable will of God.
It's all part of God's plan.
I'm not sure how my schadenfreude helps God, but I guess that's why I'm down here, and he's up there.
God just couldn't be effed.
Was anyone else hoping it was the Hobby Lobby funded one that bought fake antiquities?
I was hoping it was that batshit insane creation museum in Kentucky run by equally batshit Ken "there were velociraptors and t-rexes on the ark" Hamm
Is that dude still alive?! Man, that name brings back memories, he's a... character
Dude. If you take an edible and go there it's probably a trip
That's exactly what I was hoping for. I'm sort of disappointed.
They shouldn't allow hate museums about hate books that teach people it's OK to hate, because of religion.
What a waste of time, effort, and money. That's what religion is. Just a waste.
The problem isn't that someone can start a museum about something stupid. It's a private endeavor and they can do what they want. The problem is that, as a religious organization, we're essentially helping fund them through tax exemption.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Hahahahahahahahahah
And another one
And another one
And another one bites the dust
Meh, they're tax exempt and still own the land, so investment wise it was likely not a bad move.
Coulda got a pretty fly G6 and some cocaine for that money, what were they thinking?
That was just seed money. They were shooting for several G6's - one for each founder - and a metric shitton of cocaine.
You'll never be a real grifter unless you set your sights higher. Play the long game; stop thinking rookie numbers.
The lord works in mysterious ways...
Oh no! Now where are people going to go to get their Disneyfied understanding of the most translated and published book in history?
But more to the point, what is the NEXT religious-themed grift coming round the mountain?
They think the Bible hasn't already been translated into every language?
It’s definitely been translated into the most used languages, but there are a bunch more that are being worked on still.
Here’s an infographic on it from another org: https://www.wycliffe.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2023_Infographic-Large_EN.pdf
Looks like the way they calculate it, 80% of people in the world have access to a full translation of the Bible in their language.
There's also new original translations being done every year or two anyway. To say nothing of the dozens of smaller translation projects like Schlafly's Conservative Bible.
Supply Side Jesus used to be a joke
How much are they changing the translation to appeal more broadly to the recipients?
It's also hard to know how many languages in that chart are only spoken by multilingual people, in which case, a Bible in their language is not really necessary.
“Structural limitations”? What were they trying to do?
view more: next ›