Meh, that was a pretty weak nazi salute. I care less about that stuff and more about thier actions that affect actual policy and such. Those actions are usually worse anyway.
Modern_medicine_isnt
I've heard of usenet. Never understood how they can exist legally. Or how people pay them legally.
I play things like satisfactory, tf2, portal, doom stuff. But I am too old to play anything where reaction time really matters all that much. Like tf2 I only play mann vs machine now. My monitors are just 144hz. Nothing too fancy. Though I do have 2. And I forgot about VR. I want to get one, but I have no idea if linux supports them or how much the graphics card matters these days.
This is the truth of it. Picking up $100 bill off the ground in public that isn't yours isn't actually illegal. And what trump is doing is attempting to stretch the powers of his office. This isn't anything new really. Just how he is doing it, how much and how fast is new.
Did you actually read that. A lot of "potentially", "possibly" and things like that. In short, it isn't all that clear cut.
Which laws. Cause I haven't seen any quoted anywhere. And, they only gave him immunity for official acts. Then said they (the courts) get to decide what an official act is. Lastly, they did not take away congress's ability to prosecute him in the form of impeachment.
What was illegal about what musk did? Be specific. On paper he is "working" for the president, and my understanding is that the cabinet members in charge of the various agencies gave him the go ahead to do what he is doing. Both of those are directly or indirectly elected officials charged with running the executive branch of the government. My take is that congress has depended on gentleman's agreements rather than passing laws to ensure the agencies aren't tampered with like is happening now.
Why would I want to make myself sadder. Lol. It's kind of like deflatgate in American football. If you take top people in any profession, and put them in a competition with a serious reward, they will always try to "stretch" the rules in thier favor any way they can.
Living inside the same imaginary lines on a map doesn't make them our people. The Russian government has more influence over such people than you or I.
Rather than screaming that he should be arresting people, this footage should be used to wipe convictions off the record for other protesters who didn't get similar treatment.
All in all. This is an example of how a cop "should" behave. Protecting the rights of ANY citizen to protest. There is no way to know from the video if this was just a good cop doing the job well, or if it was a cop who favors thier cause.
Also, I love the idea of a neo-nazi with a service animal. Pretty sure that weakness would have made a person "undesirable" under hitler.
What is the legal argument against this? The article was paywalled, but the summay only says that past presidents have respected agency independence. That sounds like just a gentlemans agreement. Nothing legally binding. So do the challenges have a leg to stand on?
So it's federated like lemmy? Interesting. So you pay an instance I assume. But does that get you access to all other instances like lemmy? That seems odd, but possible.