this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
465 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

59682 readers
3742 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 126 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Can we talk about the thumbnail? Glorious.

[–] Zugyuk 80 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I can't tell if that's a deepfake'd cross-eyed David Letterman high on cocaine or the jpeg compression is so bad it's given everyone mutant fingers.

[–] theangryseal 14 points 8 months ago

I feel like I seen that photo way before deepfake was a thing.

Reminds me of Pentecostal church as a kid.

[–] SuperIce 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is a really old photo at this point. Where do you see mutant fingers? It looks normal to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The woman's hand in the back looks weird.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Looks like JPEG'd jewelry to me

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Letterman's pinky looks like it has a chunk taken out and a slice through it, woman in the back looks like her mechanical fork is holding a computer mouse, and the kid on the left looks like he has a nubby growth on his middle finger with his thumb morphing into his ring finger. Also didn't think Letterman was crosseyed.

But from the amount of jpg compression I figured it had to be re-saved about 100 times over by now. Shit's old.

[–] ATDA 7 points 8 months ago

HEY KIDS check out my Ryuk impression can you believe Netflix didn't cast me !?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

He had shat the bed a long time ago

[–] DandomRude 104 points 8 months ago

Musk has already turned Twitter into Truth Social anyway. So no need.

[–] [email protected] 95 points 8 months ago (1 children)

hey buddy, I hear you buy worthless shit that doesn’t make a profit.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It's probably got some value, and I'd guess that its utility is either gonna be to politicians who want access to information about social media users who support Trump or to some other social media network that is already working on monetization, so that it can reuse existing stuff.

I'm skeptical that it's worth much, though. The value is gonna be in the userbase.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_Social

Users: estimated 607,000 monthly users as of July 2023[4]

That's not a whole lot.

Ostensibly a place for freer speech than Twitter, Truth Social

If Musk wants to create a separate social media platform with less-restrictive rules on content, I'd imagine that he'd be in a pretty good position to do that. He's already got a codebase. Just needs to have a separate comment database from Twitter.

[–] kautau 12 points 8 months ago

Don’t worry, the FSB will fund it, they need it since they’re only good at digital war and found out they’re bad at physical war

[–] Tylerdurdon 72 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So we've proven Elon can ruin a functional social media platform, but what about a dysfunctional one? He might... Fix it?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

Only by causing an integer overflow of the dysfunctionality index.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 8 months ago

trying to offload it onto a sucker's market as soon as possible because they know the value of that stinker only drops from here

[–] MushuChupacabra 45 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why would he do that, when he could smart-ass his way into a legally binding contract to buy Twitter for much more money, and then trash it until it's interchangeable with Truth?

[–] takeda 41 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Though I must say I'm still upset at the losers that are still on twitter.

I feel like people changed drastically over the last two decades and are more likely to accept being fucked in the ass by corporations.

Remember what happened to digg when they changed the site to control the articles that are being posted? Or to Myspace when it was purchased by Murdoch?

What the hell happened?

[–] Sanctus 20 points 8 months ago

Well, The Battle of Blair Mountain happened because the workers were sick of being paid in company scrip, living in company housing, and shopping and company stores. So maybe we're not back to that yet. But dont ever forget that is the end goal for all these shit stains.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Normies happened.

Digg was nerds and MySpace was teens. Each left their site for different reasons. Neither was popular with mainstream society as a whole.

Twitter is normies and normies don’t really give a shit, happy to live in the status quo never changing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

How does normies compare to neurotypicals? I wouldnt say that classic social media is only neurotypicals but there does seems to be a major overlap.

EDIT: This is an honest to god question by an autist. I cannot tell the difference besides neurotypical being an accepted scientific term for majority-normal personality and normies being some kind of slang for seemingly the same thing.

[–] masquenox 41 points 8 months ago

They deserve each other.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Isn't it just a Mastodon instance?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yup, and the Mastodon devs almost took them to court for stealing their code. Of course at the last minute Trump Media published their changes to Mastodon to adhere to the GPL.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

GPL works again, though maybe not much useful to merge back from Trump Media....

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Trump is insanely greedy, greed is literally the only thing he knows. It doesn't matter if he picked up a dead leaf from a pile in the middle of autumn, he'd want to sell it to someone.

Unfortunately some dumbass maga moron would probably buy it...

[–] eran_morad 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Some opera company could make a killing putting on Pagliacci with trump as Canio.

[–] cybersandwich 45 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is probably a super sick burn in the opera community.

[–] eran_morad 16 points 8 months ago

Seriously, tho. Couldn’t you see it? Some fat guy with an orange and white face, a menacing scowl, scant and lengthy piss-yellow wisps winding and crowning his countenance, an oversized suit dwarfing his hands, with a red tie down to his knees. Ridi, pagliacco!

[–] Burn_The_Right 24 points 8 months ago

Excellent photo.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

They may still be on negotiations. I can picture Truth as "Y, the social network that comes after X". It sure can't fail. Then a merge can happen, they can call it Z or Musk may be bold about it and call it Ω.

[–] Asidonhopo 7 points 8 months ago

!remindme 1 year

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Uft, imagine if that happened and musk chose a single unicode character as the domain?!
Unicode are already sanitised from domains, because there are ubicode characters that look like - but are distinct from - ascii characters... which opens a huge pandoras box of MITM attacks of malicious sites on domains that visually look the same as legit domains.

If musk wants a single unicode character, all the browsers are going to have to figure out that can of worms

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago
[–] Etterra 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

His eyes in this picture look AI generated.

[–] Tylerdurdon 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Trying to take a photo that looks AI generated is an art form.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Faced with mounting legal troubles and a sputtering special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) deal, former president Donald Trump reportedly turned somewhere unexpected last year to offload his flailing social media platform, Truth Social: X owner and Tesla technoking Elon Musk.

Ostensibly a place for freer speech than Twitter, Truth Social launched in 2022 with plans to take the platform public as soon as possible through a sale to a SPAC formed for the purpose, Digital World Acquisition Corp (DWA).

The deal has yet to close, with the US Securities and Exchange Commission heavily criticizing the use of a Chinese firm to develop DWA.

By September 2022 Trump Media and Technology Group (TMTG), parent company of Truth Social, had threatened to sue the SEC for delaying the TMTG/DWA merger.

We received no response from either party, while The WaPo was told by TMTG that "We heard Trump and Musk were actually discussing buying the Washington Post but they decided it had no value."

Trump, who would hold more than half the shares of the combined company, would reportedly stand to raise his net worth by some $4 billion - more than enough to handle those legal problems without Musk's help.


The original article contains 528 words, the summary contains 199 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Ledivin 11 points 8 months ago

We received no response from either party, while The WaPo was told by TMTG that "We heard Trump and Musk were actually discussing buying the Washington Post but they decided it had no value."

lol... Bezos already has - and, unlike Musk, continues to generate - effectively infinite money. Why on earth would he sell WaPo?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I was hoping this was what their recent meeting was instead of muskrat bailing him out

[–] TallonMetroid 6 points 8 months ago

I mean, wouldn't paying for Truth basically be bailing President Loser out?

[–] Jakdracula 8 points 8 months ago

Here’s the best summary I can come up with:

Trump (pictured) says “my pants shit their pants!”

[–] PoliticallyIncorrect 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Fuck yeah, why not?, just let Musk fuck Truth in a temper tantrum like Twitter..

[–] gaifux -1 points 8 months ago

Literally nobody cares