this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
42 points (66.4% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6295 readers
303 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Probably not too unpopular here.

Standing waiting for the bus in my city with decent transit and I have 2 trucks rev their engines loudly past me, another one letting just clouds of pollution, watching people driving who aren't paying attention and several people blowing cutting last second through a light. All in just 3 minutes by a small corner with light traffic.

Made me think how cars are inherently selfish. People don't want to be around others (the fear aspect), so they drive their own bubble around. In addition to that, some go out of their way to make their cars even worse to people outside of them.

No wonder we can't move away from them. They are a definition of our own culture

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I think calling it a culture of fear and selfishness is a pretty significant disservice to the reality of how car companies bought and dismantled public transit.

It was stolen from us, we didn't reject it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Lots of people are happy to reject it these days though, it's like the mythical Stockholm syndrome come to life

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That’s definitely a big part, but it’s both. Like white flight out of cities and insisting on a detached suburban home, the other part of the story is that cars represent “social worth” for many in North America.

It’s why car people become so angrily defensive, and fight even modest changes. Cars aren’t just functional. They represent a cherished value system. Their worth as a person is tied up with their car.

That said, just like diamond rings and smoking, even this weird cultural norm was bought by industry advertising. We’re social apes, who do things to feel important and valued, even when it otherwise makes no sense.

[–] reddig33 14 points 8 months ago (3 children)

America’s love affair with cars is tied to independence.

A car means you can travel anywhere in the contiguous 48 states — vacation, visit friends and family. It also means you can look for work and get a job in a wider area than relying on just living near work. This means better pay, and access to cheaper housing. A vehicle also helps to haul goods meaning it’s easier to become an independent contractor.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Except in most other countries they have access to the same amount of independence, but don't need a car to do the same thing.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

A train only takes you to so many train stops. A car can take you anywhere the roads can take you, and more of you drive around off road.

[–] folshost 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This why public transit systems generally include buses. I will concede no-one uses buses for off-roading, but I would guess 90% of Americans do not drive their car off-road more than once or twice a year total, so I fail to see why that would be particularly relevant for a mass-market appeal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The only reason it feels like independence is because people are trapped living on suburbs without any public transit. I have never lived on the suburbs, only in city centers with multiple alternatives to transportation (started to ride the bus alone at 10yo), but the couple of times visiting family on the suburbs I felt trapped waiting for someone who drive me anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Yep having a reliable car is one of the biggest freedoms there is. Too bad their environmental footprint is high when so many are on the roads.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

eh, I disagree. a personal vehicle can (generally doesnt because traffic is a thing) provide a sense of freedom. there's a certain romantic appeal to having your own vehicle and there's certainly freedom in an open road - if you ignore the fact you're roped into buying fuel and general maintenance for said vehicle. the only way I can see fear being a factor would be the "can I afford the next major expense".

mass transit is more efficient, cant really argue against that, but it's in no way individualized or even customizable in any way at a personal level. you also have to base your entire schedule around the bus/train and then when it doesnt show up on time (or show up at all) you're basically fucked. a personal vehicle has none of those failings. as a matter of fact, in many places in America you're required to own your own vehicle because the cities are few and far between... existing without owning a vehicle is akin to being stranded on a deserted island - you're cut off from the rest of the world. most folks dont like being physically cut off from society - preventing it isnt selfishness, it's being prepared

[–] SpaceNoodle 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, the culture of "rugged individualism" is part of the problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Nobody is buying "spongy collectivism"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I love my car and I'm not ashamed of it. It's true, I don't want to be on a train or in a bus with you (or any other stranger) but I don't think fear is the right word for that. Sometimes there are people on mass transit who do seem like they might be dangerous, but usually everyone is clearly harmless and it's still unpleasant for me to be around them.

I used to think this dislike of being physically close to other people was a human universal but apparently it isn't. The best analogy I can come up with for someone who doesn't share it is that people are like an annoying noise. The more people there are and the closer they are to me, the louder that noise is. Being in a crowded train or bus is like standing near an ambulance with its siren on. It's not scary, and it's not unbearable. I could stand next to that ambulance if I needed to, and sometimes I do. It upsets me, I can deal with being upset, but I'm willing to spend a lot of money (and to pollute the environment) in order to avoid it.

(Even if I always had the entire train or bus to myself, I would still prefer to drive because taking mass transit is usually much slower than driving. But that's a separate issue...)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ikidd 9 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

People don't want to be around others (the fear aspect), so they drive their own bubble around.

You say this like it's a bad thing. It doesn't have to be fear, it can just be preference. There are introverts and asocial people, neurodivergent people, people with social anxiety, and any number of other reasons that they don't have to justify to you as to why they would prefer not to be around a mass of other people. Social interaction in cities tends to be of an impersonal gesellschaft nature anyway, so it's not like you're missing out on a genuine social experience most of the time. It's fine to just interact with those you personally vet and invest in.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Yeah those climate-controlled cockpits are great, ngl, especially for a long drive of hundreds of miles that would've taken MONTHS by most other means. But they aren't the most ideal form of transit in all situations, and yet people - independently from whether they are behind the wheels of their vehicles or not - are so selfish that extremely often they actively prevent the construction of alternatives that would be more eco-friendly, healthier, etc. Anyway, you can't control others only yourself, so do what you can do to be happier.

Oh, and I can add that I have seen drivers who act in a kindly manner. It can be done. i.e., it's the driver, not the vehicle. Well, not only the vehicle anyway, though it may be a contributing factor.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

It's called people need to get to work. Governments build public transit, not individuals. Individuals vote, but progress takes time.

[–] Ptsf 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Eh you can be upsetti all you want about cars, truth is it's not even a significant portion of the damage we do to the planet, it's just the most democratized one. The freedom having a transport craft allows is insane compared to even the most robust public infrastructure and yes in a perfect world that would be entirely unnecessary but we're /so/ far off from that goal you'd be better off focusing on something that matters within the environmental class war (The rich (corps & people)) pollute and damage the ecosystem to a far greater degree than the entirety of any transport or logistics infrastructure. Just consider all the microplastic that we've literally littered everywhere on the entire planet. It's in the rain. Cars did not put plastic in your rain. A single person's choices did not do it, nor could they prevent it.

Tldr: focus on something that matters and doesn't negatively impact the lives and freedoms of significant amounts of people before you focus on the things that do. You'll find mobility against the greed of a few is far easier to stir than mobility against the needs of the many.

[–] motor_spirit 2 points 8 months ago

Yes and Republicans drive the largest gas guzzling rigs they can, it's all there. It's all about fear and control with them, and whatever tough guy appearance they can salvage while being overweight with a mouthful of dip shit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The start of this was back in the 1950s based on getting out of the city where there were, oh no, black people. Yes fear, selfish, and stupid from the beginning.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Cars are horseless carriages.

[–] MrJameGumb 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I need my car so I can visit my elderly mother who lives 2 hours away and frequently needs me to help her with things. There is no public transit that goes there. I'm sorry if you think that's "selfish" 🙄

[–] FlordaMan 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don’t think they meant the individuals are always selfish, more that the whole culture (and thus the lack of public transport) exists because of selfishness and fear.

Also in countries which are not as reliant on cars most people still have access to a car, they just use it less often.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The lack of transit is due to the culture of selfishness. Are you honestly taking this as a personal attack?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

The lack of transit is not due to a culture. It's due to systemic lobbying and political failing to get public works built and funded.

Where public transit is available, and properly funded, Americans use it.

[–] MrJameGumb 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

People don't want to be around others (the fear aspect), so they drive their own bubble around. In addition to that, some go out of their way to make their cars even worse to people outside of them.

That seems pretty personal to me...

[–] SpaceNoodle 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And yet, I was somehow able to not take it personally despite my having similar reasons for needing a car as you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you're taking that personally then I would really look inwards, and ask yourself why you took that as a personal insult.

[–] MrJameGumb 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Sure, I'll get right on that 😉

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PassingThrough 1 points 8 months ago

I agree with fear, and offer you an additional fear that I and those around me are very familiar with:

Cars bring “reliable transportation” to our doorstep, granting us the freedom to be employed at jobs that don’t care if the bus is late or the metro had an issue…you appear at work or be penalized.

Worse is the way shifts and callouts are handled today…my shifts are in different times in different days…there is no consistency in order to be “fair” to all employees. And if someone is sick, many places require you to find someone willing to drop everything and cover, or face penalties.

I don’t live in an area with major public transit. We have roads and cars and a couple of county circular buses.

I used to know a guy who needed that bus for work. He had a disability that meant he would never be able to drive, and that bus was his only option. He was late for work more than once because the bus was late. In times of weather or holidays he would ride the route that left him unpaid at work hours too early, and/or stuck long after shift waiting for the bus. Perhaps this could have been solved with more busses, or if he could find a job that would take him closer to home, or someone to carpool with, but it didn’t work out like that and within a year he was let go. Disability protection didn’t protect him from “not having reliable transportation”, which was the excuse they gave to dodge complaints but frankly as an At-Will state they didn’t really need it. He failed to meet the job requirements by not being in control of his transport and that was enough to end his job.

Car access gave people the freedom to travel freely and meet the demands of employers also built on car culture. Now we have the “freedom” to work inconsistent hours, suddenly as needed, or leave early to cut costs as desired, and be penalized because our travel is within our control.

load more comments
view more: next ›