And I haven't.
Edit I clarified to you that such posts draw people in to advise. That's just how it is.
I also asked what your objective with these posts is because every reply to everyone is dismissive, as if you want zero replies at all
Nothing I said was hostile. If anything it's simply direct.
I didn't use any insults or suggest you are wrong, I asked you to clarify why this is posted on a "conversation" forum
Edit such a post draws people in to offer advice or learn more about your situation. It's just confusing to people why you post in an advice style way, but don't accept any of it
How would you describe this series of posts then? You don't want advice, and seemingly don't want to change anything at all
The other dude is experiencing the same heat.
Also burning someone with a cigar for around something rude, implied or direct, is super fucked up
Why'd he do that?
Squirt of mustard onto the skillet before applying the meatball! It caramelizes into the meat only leaving a great depth of flavor, not a mustard forward finish
Is opus dei a race oriented organization?
I mean yeah he's probably a racist but what about the new detail in the headline emphasizes that?
Seems like a normal, if a bit slow, response from a business seeking to retain or regain customers.
Glad to see it
Aside from the FOMO, if he had info from his doctor that the chance of regaining pain free use of the finger after the long recovery was low, then it's just a personal choice to remove it. We can't really relate to that.
Sure, I'm handwaving a lot, just saying the ability to manipulate minds and teleport to places (even with the kidnapped person) presents an x factor that is hard to overstate.
? Most companies would never address it.
Celebrate positive while not forgetting the negative.
I was just banned for a comment that was critical of kamala Harris, critical of Hamas, pro Palestinian civilians who are suffering genocide from the Israeli government
"Rule 1" and I didn't even use a slur or anything.
Quotes incoming, have to copy paste
I guess I missed the point. Like, when he's beating up an animal abuser, or public sexual deviant it makes more sense. He's intervening to make people or animals safe, and the violence is more justified.
Burning a dude for making a quip is fucked up, and doesn't align with what I thought the character was.
His violence here devalues his violence elsewhere. Apparently hes just violent whenever he's inconvenienced or annoyed, not when he's attempting to make others safe, or preserve some justice to the downtrodden