this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
574 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19150 readers
3802 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pixxelkick 119 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Classic twisting of the thumb screws. The prisoners dilemma is functional of how trustworthy your co-conspirator is.

And its safe to say when it comes to people who seriously would consider trying to overthrow an election for personal gain, you cant trust any of em, so of course everyone is gonna crack. 10/10 this will be fun to watch

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Except they've been achieving the optimal prisoner's dilemma outcome until now by protecting each other. Idk, I won't believe he'll flip until he does. For all I know, this is just a way to plead for Trump's help for funding legal fees out in the open.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think there are any funds.

Wouldn't that be marvelous if it turned out the RNC funding was one gigantic ponzi scheme and all the money was going to pay-off Trumps debts?

[–] Fades 4 points 1 year ago

Not really that far from the truth relatively speaking

[–] MsPenguinette 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's easy to stay in line while it's working. The moment you are actually in court looking at years in prison, that's when the dilemma really becomes tough to stick to.

Also, in this scenario, there is no guarantee that everyone staying in line will mean they get away. Which makes the calculus much much more complicated as opposed to when it's just trying to avoid an indictment all together

[–] TechyDad 11 points 1 year ago

Also, there's an increased pressure to not be the first one to flip, but once someone flips, it'll be a race to flip ASAP.

If you're the first one to flip, you'll get attacked by MAGA folks. However, they're less likely to attack the second or third flipper.

Prosecutors will only take so many flips, though. What can the 10th person tell them that the first 9 haven't? So if you're waiting and someone flips, you want to flip early while prosecutors are still willing to make a deal.

I think we'll see one person flip and then a mad dash for others to flip. They night even wait for the expedited cases. If those go badly, the rest of the bunch will be flipping as fast as they can shout "give us a deal please!"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not really a Prisoner's Dilemma when one prisoner doesn't have the opportunity to flip, though - it's not like if Trump agrees to testify against Meadows they're going to reduce his sentence.

[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Meadows made clear in his own testimony at last week’s hearing that Trump viewed the false electors as a significant part of his strategy to remain in power. He said he sent an email pushing the campaign to assemble those slates because he feared a tongue-lashing from Trump.

“What I didn’t want to happen was for the campaign to prevail in court action and not have this” lined up, he said.

“Why?” prosecutor Anna Cross asked him.

“Because I knew I’d be yelled at by the president of the United States,” he said.

Yeah…great reason to try to upend democracy, Mark.

[–] Octavio 87 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At first I was mad at Mark Meadows for trying to destroy American democracy and rob me of my freedom, but, gosh if he faced the possibility of being yelled at, I guess he didn’t have any choice. So brave.

[–] FReddit 7 points 1 year ago

Your sarcasm hit a note here. There is no excuse.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm so confused why anyone would be intimidated by traitor orange. The fuckin guy is a short fat turd who wears makeup and not in the cool way people wear makeup.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

More accurate to say most are intimidated by drumpf's base. Not getting votes after he is no longer an option, getting death threats, etc. No one is actually intimidated by him personally.

Except for Mark Meadows, Chief Pussy.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

I was thinking he has less guts and integrity than the average four year old sneaking cookies before dinner.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago

The Nuremberg Defense probably works better if the person whose orders you claim to have been following is still alive and ranting on Twitter about how they damn well were his orders and he takes credit for the whole thing.

[–] TokenBoomer 32 points 1 year ago

Remember to bend the knees Mark, and look back as you follow through the flip.

[–] Zerlyna 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

feverently munching on popcorn

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You probably meant fervently or feverishly (which may be even funnier)

[–] Zerlyna 15 points 1 year ago

Yup. It’s been a day already. Either works. 😔🤣

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So, are you allowed to call in to Hannity's show from federal prison? What about state prison? Asking for someone who is definitely not a friend.

[–] FuglyDuck 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It would depend on the warden

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Joe Biggs (Proud Boys leader who was sentenced to 17 years last week) called in to Infowars TWICE from prison on the same episode.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Politico reported on Mark Meadows’ potential legal strategy as the White House chief of staff faces charges connected with Trump’s alleged conspiracy to overturn Georgia’s 2020 election results. The report referred to court documents showing a strong likelihood that Meadows will join Trump’s other former allies who will blame the ex-president and portray him as the “primary driver” of the racketeering enterprise they’ve been accused of.

Do it Mark, don’t go to jail for the orange buffoon.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

He should still spend some time in jail, just not as long as the orange buffoon.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They have nothing to lose by turning on Trump at this point.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

The rabid MAGA idiots will threaten them. But to that I say, oh no, too bad, let me make some popcorn

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Getting killed by medicated trump cultists?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't see why all of them are not telling on Trump. Trump certainly doesn't care about them and I believe if Trump could blame it all on them, he would.

[–] tburkhol 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think some of them are deluded enough to think that it really is like an impeachment and any jury is going to be hopelessly deadlocked between its Democratic and Republican members. Or that the deep state will work its magic, retire all the prosecutors, and there will never even be trials.

I mean, these are generally not smart people with firm grip on reality we're talking about.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, the Georgia legislature already has members trying to get rid of Fani Willis, and if they can stall them out that long, the federal cases will disappear under the next Republican president.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

When you're coming off of a lifetime of anything being able to be smoothed over given enough money and power, it's hard to imagine an alternative.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah that's kind of what I expected. The prosecution wants to pin down Trump, so they let a few conspirators flip to make that happen. The rest will get buried alongside Trump.

It's gonna be really interesting how trump will address/ spin this publicly. If it's only one guy who flipped, he could probably just feed him to the wolves in the media, but this is gonna be a bunch of ppl turning on him. Idk if he can convince his followers to instantly switch to hating on them. There's gonna be a bunch of ppl on the fence about trump who will take any evidence to hop off the bandwagon.

Either way, having a public criminal trial while running a campaign is about as much of a PR disaster as it's gonna get. Remember: the goal of the prosecution is to pin him down with every piece of damning evidence they can get, it's gonna get dirty.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He can turn his fans quite easily, I think.

The bad scary deep-state government, run by Joe Brandon, threatened them with so much jail time that they had no choice but to turn on me. It makes sense. I don't blame them. What else can you do?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then there are my parents who will support him regardless.

[–] TechyDad 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

My parents appear to be trying to move on, but without saying that Trump did anything wrong. For them, it's basically just "let's ignore all those crimes... Hey, did you hear about these great candidates Rick Scott or RFK, Jr?" (And, yes, my father did try to tell me how great those two are.)

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YoBuckStopsHere 15 points 1 year ago

The GOP Civil War rages on.

[–] CharlesDarwin 14 points 1 year ago

Rev up the circular firing squad and I'll grab some popcorn...

[–] randon31415 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At this point, I don't get really what is gained by flipping people against Trump. The argument isn't that he did or didn't do something. The argument is (in the minds of the jury at least) is what he did against the law. Yes, it might seem clear to us that it was, but to some Trump supporter on the jury having someone else say 'Trump did a thing', doesn't change their mind that the thing he did and admits to doing is illegal.

[–] drewofdoom 20 points 1 year ago

Cooperation from co-conspirators is always helpful.

Trump's current strategy (or, at least what we can discern from his lawyers' TV appearances) is to blame the lawyers he had at the time of the election. If all these co-conspirators point the finger directly at Trump, that goes a loooong way to proving that he was the ringleader. Not some lawyer. Not some aide. Trump called the shots.

That's what they want.

[–] Treczoks 5 points 1 year ago

Just imagine someone close to the whole situation turns against Trump as a witness.They could provide the extra juicy bits that would make impressing the jury much easier.

[–] cabron_offsets 7 points 1 year ago

This promises to be the greatest media spectacle of all time.

[–] MushuChupacabra 6 points 1 year ago

Dooooooo it!

[–] Jackolantern 6 points 1 year ago

And now we wait. Hopefully this guy follows through and flip like a gymnast on steroids.

load more comments
view more: next ›