this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
249 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20689 readers
3944 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago

I'm going to keep coming back with this until some-habs takes me up on it.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 3 hours ago

You know what's worse than pulling things off the shelves? Threatening the sovereignty of foreign nations and then making up bullshit tariffs to do so

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Who is wasting money on Jack Daniel’s anyway? Literally everything in the same price range is better

It’s $20 quality sold for $40

[–] [email protected] 1 points 30 minutes ago

Yeah that whinging from that source tells us it’s an adequate target.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 hours ago

Cool. You're a giant corporation with pockets deep enough to keep making meaningful statements. Keep it up.

(They won't)

[–] [email protected] 86 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Dear Mr. Daniel,
I'm sorry that a store pulling things from their shelves is hurting your business, but I thought you should know that this is not even the tip of the iceberg.
Regardless of what any store does, I will simply not be buying Jack Daniel's, probably ever, along with a slew of other things, as many as I possibly can.

There are so many better whiskeys around the world that I certainly don't need to.
I empathize with the collateral damage this may cause, and hope that something, anything really, is eventually enough for y'all fuckers to start thinking about getting your shit together.
In the meantime, I will simply Buy Anything But American.

I am just one person, but I am not alone.
Sincerely,
Fix your shit or get fucked,
A random Canadian

[–] [email protected] 1 points 24 minutes ago

its going to end up like soybean tariffs with china, china found other sources of soybeans from asia, and south america, and largely ditched USA. im sure canada will do the same with alcohol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

But Four Roses tho :(

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I can't even smell the stuff it's horrible.

And I drink Laphroaig neat.

[–] Lon3star 8 points 5 hours ago

Liquid bandaids

[–] PlantJam 4 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Are Jack and Laphroaig on similar levels? I know import vs domestic drives the prices apart some, but I just assumed Jack was more like a "cheap top shelf".

[–] Hayduke 10 points 4 hours ago

Oh goodness me, no. Think Rose Art vs Crayola, respectively.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They seem like different animals to me. I wouldn't compare the two.

I can't speak of higher end Jack, but Laphroaig base is far better than Jack base.

[–] PlantJam 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah that's been my experience, too, which is why the comment comparing the two confused me.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker 2 points 4 hours ago

Someone commented that it was the smell they were comparing... not the taste. I like peaty smell so didn't make sense.

[–] Lon3star 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Laphroaig is a punch you in the face level peaty/smokey Scotch

[–] PlantJam 1 points 2 hours ago

It's one of my favorites!

[–] [email protected] 55 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I stole this photo from Reddit just for this occasion

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

I'm stealing it for the next occasion. thanks!

[–] owenfromcanada 44 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Random Canadian dude says U.S. threatening Canada's sovereignty 'worse than pulling alcohol off shelves"

[–] partial_accumen 10 points 4 hours ago

Random American here agreeing with Random Canadian brother or sister. I stand on guard for thee!

[–] fluxion 34 points 6 hours ago

Take it up with Trump, not Canada

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Canada sends its regards. The North remembers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Je me souviens!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 hours ago

I think what's wild is that Canada only makes 1% of Jack Daniel's sales while Mexico makes up 7% of their sales.

If Mexico pulls Jack off their shelves, it'll hit harder.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Without doing any research, I'd be hard pressed to believe they didn't support trump all the way.

[–] Tikiporch 3 points 4 hours ago

Mostly Democrats actually, and no one at a Federal level.

[–] CharlesDarwin 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Wonder what happens if more Americans stop buying their alcohol?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 minutes ago

thier politics might shift, russia uses alcohol as a method of control to prevent uprising against putin/oligarchs.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe 10 points 5 hours ago

What’s really sad is that Brown-Forman Corp (owner of Jack Daniels brand) donated to mostly Democratic state/local candidates, and no federal / national party candidates.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, bub, we actually prefer good whiskey up here.

[–] FuglyDuck 3 points 4 hours ago

I have only once bought a bottle of jack.

And it was a joke to somebody who hates the stuff. (Specifically it was a minibar shot bottle… funny as hell though.)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago

I feel like if anyone can remove an American president it's jack Daniel's.

[–] Fondots 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not much of a JD fan in general, it's an OK whiskey but it doesn't do anything that plenty of other whiskeys don't do better.

I had a personal boycott of JD going for a few years, my wife and I are both whiskey drinkers and we visited TN for the 2017 eclipse. We decided while we were there we might as well make a detour to the distillery. I'm sure with the eclipse it was probably one of the busiest tourism weeks they've had there, so we weren't surprised to find a long line waiting for us. We made the most of it, it took us about 45 minutes to get to the front of the line, it snaked through a little mini museum, and it gave us some time to decide which tour we wanted to do.

But when we got to the front of the line we were informed that all of the tours we were interested in were sold out, and the only one available was the one that didn't allow you to try any whiskey at the end.

At no point during the 45 minutes we were standing around did they make any sort of announcement or put a sign up or anything to let us know that the other tours were sold out, if they had we probably would have decided to just go on that tour, but that really pissed us off, so we left.

I decided that I wouldn't give Jack any of my money after that, not that I was buying a whole lot of it anyway.

A year or two ago they ran an ad campaign with some drag queens. I decided that my personal boycott had gone on long enough and I could reward that little bit of token wokeness, although I have to admit that I still haven't bought any JD since then.

And like too many other companies it looks like they've now rolled back their DEI initiatives, so fuck 'em, back on the boycott list they go.

Now as a whisky drinker in the US, I'm disappointed that there's going to be tariffs affecting Canadian whisky, I'm a little torn as to whether I should support my favorite Canadian brands or avoid them since the tariffs are going to be funneling money to the trump administration.

I'm certainly going to be cutting back on my American whiskeys and many other American products in protest. I encourage my fellow whiskey drinkers to the north to do the same, you guys make some fine rye, I'll gladly take some Alberta Premium over almost anything made in the States.

I suspect I'm going to find myself drinking a lot of Scotch, Irish, and Japanese whisk(e)ys for the next few years, but I look forward to the day when I can hopefully enjoy some Canadian rye again without Trump's tariffs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I’m a little torn as to whether I should support my favorite Canadian brands or avoid them since the tariffs are going to be funneling money to the trump administration.

Come drink it at my house then.
That way you're not crossing the border with any bottles, just your stomach contents which isn't subject to import tariffs.
Unless you somehow get the whole bottle in there which would become smuggling.

[–] Fondots 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Careful, when the couple bottles I already have kicking around run out I might try to take you up on that offer.

Assuming you're Canadian, I've had the pleasure of visiting a few different parts of your country a handful of times, and each one was of the most memorable trips of my life, so I'm always happy for an excuse to return.

Depending on where you are, it may not even be the longest drive I've taken to get some whiskey (current record is about 12 hours)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago