this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
1227 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19940 readers
3350 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez urged countering the Trump administration’s policies by resisting at every turn, arguing that its incompetence makes it vulnerable.

Her remarks followed chaos caused by a rescinded executive order that temporarily shut down Medicaid portals nationwide.

She encouraged activists to take offline action, citing ongoing mobilization efforts.

Her strategy focuses on making governance difficult for Trump, calling his administration “dangerous and cruel” but also “shockingly dim.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong 298 points 1 week ago (63 children)

Any kind of on the ground movement or mobilization needs political support in the halls of power. It's what made the resistance demonstrated against Trump the first term possible, and the dynamic goes both ways. On the ground resistance gives political actors the space to be resilient. Resilient politicians give in the ground movement space to work.

Basically all other Democrats other than Bernie and AOC shrivelling up and hiding in their shells will have a chilling effect on our ability to organize on the ground.

[–] GoofSchmoofer 51 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've been bitching about the lack of leadership from the Democrats for a while now - I'm glad to see that others are seeing it too.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They need to dump Wasserman-Schulz. She's a big part of the reason we're in this mess.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Heinrich from NM has made it clear that he will pushback. Let’s see what that looks like. I suggest folks that can contact your reps, now and frequently.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (61 replies)
[–] [email protected] 139 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (33 children)

It isn't chump and his taintsuckers you gotta worry about.

It's the army of Federalist Society lawyers and policy experts around him. They've spent decades figuring out the removed in the armor of our governmental system. Figuring out how to dismantle it piece by piece.

Edit - wtf is that removed about? Wait....oh. bot thinks I did a racism.

[–] Machinist 46 points 1 week ago (16 children)

Fucken hell, that's the correct fucking way to define a gap in armor. Bullshit. I really want to try a bunch of slurs out and see what sets it off.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I really want to try a bunch of slurs out

This is surely the most rational reaction to being slightly inconvenienced by a word filter.

[–] pyre 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

SEE WHAT YOU'RE MAKING ME DO? NOW I HAVE TO SAY THE N WORD... I DON'T WANT TO BUT YOU GAVE ME NO CHOICE!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ha. Reminds me of an Asian standup comedian who had this routine about how he grew up in the inner city where the basketball nets were made of chains and so the chains didn't go 'swish,' they went 'chіnk.' So when guys wanted to play basketball, they said, "let's go shoot us up some chіnk."

Thank you, Cyrillic letter і, for letting me bypass the bot to tell that joke. Because I've remembered that joke for years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pazu900 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you saying your comment was edited?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] [email protected] 137 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (30 children)

"Tyranny is eroded by a sea of small acts. Everything matters."

A lot of Lemmy users really need to understand this. Far too often I see people deride any action that doesn't immediately fix all problems in the world as worthless or meaningless, simply because they lack the imagination needed to see how small actions can add up to big changes.

[–] hark 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's true, but it can also be used in reverse as a pacifying mechanism. For example, contributing to making the US the most incarcerated population in the world with ridiculously strict "tough on crime" legislation and then pardoning a small fraction of prisoners. Another example is forcing student loan debt to stick around through bankruptcy, but then forgiving a tiny fraction of loans. It's a move to pretend change is in motion, but it's so small and so slow that it's never going to actually solve the problem. This is especially bad when the other party makes such huge moves in the negative direction while we're supposed to be content with tiny steps toward "progress".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] NineMileTower 115 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If all Dems had her tenacity and honest interest in helping the middle class, we wouldn't be where we are.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

~~Dems~~ Politicians FTFY sorry sometimes we forget because republicans/right are so pro rich class.

[–] grue 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's not that people don't mention Republicans in statements like that because they're letting them off the hook; it's that they don't bother mentioning them because they're a lost cause.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] demizerone 107 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Turns out when all you want are loyalists, all you get are dumb assess.

[–] SulaymanF 41 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I thought this was obvious to everyone. Heck, Futurama had this as a joke 20 years ago when Zapp Brannigan stuffed his crew with nothing but loyalists who fall apart immediately.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass 15 points 1 week ago

Philosophical inbreeding is also not good.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Look at the "secret service detail" he picked.

He picked loyalty over skill, actually DEI

Just a few inches to the right

Few More Inches

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago

He got rid of DEI to make more room for cronyism.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil 68 points 1 week ago

She encouraged activists to take offline action

Based

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 week ago

Basically, resist. Do not comply in advance. Make them fire you. Challenge that firing in court.

[–] cabron_offsets 57 points 1 week ago

She is possibly our best hope.

[–] dustyb0tt0mz 44 points 1 week ago (5 children)

finally, a person with a STRATEGY. so sick of the whining.

she needs volunteers for personal escort and safety. i think she is going to be targeted.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion 40 points 1 week ago

I just hope she comes out of this unscathed. It only takes one loon with a shiv... and now there's millions of 'em.

[–] sumguyonline 38 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I used to work for social services in Colorado. There was a Lady there that was fired without cause. She fought it, won in court, got her job back, and I'm pretty sure back pay. Beth, talking bout you, she said always fight, she has and it has always paid off.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 week ago (28 children)

Her point is that everyone has to pitch in and do their little bit to make things harder for this administration. This resistance has to be built from the bottom up.

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ohlaph 28 points 1 week ago

shockingly dim

When you hire yes men, you get some pretty dumb people.

[–] houstoneulers 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I also think we ought to stop being consumers at a broad level. It's clear the rich don't actually trickle anything down and instead hoard it to invest. So, they won't spend to prop up the economy.

[–] CitizenKong 19 points 1 week ago (6 children)

For one, stop using Amazon. Cancel Prime. Use other search engines than Google. Don't use WhatsApp. Cancel and delete your Instagram, Facebook and Twitter if you haven't already. Don't buy Apple products.

For each of those services and products above, there is at least one alternative.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Theonetheycall1845 17 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I would love to start something in my city, and I've already been trying, but it's hard to get people to mobilize. It's disheartening at the very least. Any ideas on how I can be helpful to my country aside from voting?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

I'd highly recommend this handy guide on how to find local groups that are building the foundations to fight back.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] StopTouchingYourPhone 17 points 1 week ago

"It’s important to know that a lot of productive activity is happening in person and offline, too," she said. "Not all of it can be broadcast online, but we’ve had hundreds of people showing up to our trainings, mobilizations, and more. Keep going. Tyranny is eroded by a sea of small acts. Everything matters."

load more comments
view more: next ›