TropicalDingdong

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] TropicalDingdong 1 points 55 minutes ago

I am still at work and wont get to this till the weekend, but I was running some aggregate statistics looking at '12, '16, and '20 at the precinct level.

I have the data pulled, but I need to aggregate it.

Effectively, I'm looking at demographic shifts and mapping them to outcomes. I have the data, I just need to do it.

[–] TropicalDingdong 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Oh dont get me wrong. Until I finish the work I have on my plate and can really dig into the data, its pure hopium.

I was only able to run some very preliminary stats, but in the aggregate, a move in votership of 3-5% might be plenty. It was less of a difference than that which put Obama in the white house.

But plenty doesn't matter; where plenty happens is what matters.

[–] TropicalDingdong 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Agree to disagree on the power she has, and I know very, very well how all this works.

I think you are failing to appreciate the role of rhetoric in leadership and politics and how things actually work. The job is ENTIRELY rhetorical and the job of the President is to move public opinions in specific ways toward policy positions they want them to take.

Everything after the rheotoric is an afterthought.

[–] TropicalDingdong 1 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

She's still part of an administration that can do policy. The job of president is a purely rhetorical position. Her job is and will be to move people to policy positions.

If she can move Joe Biden to a better policy on Gaze/Israel, she wins this election.

[–] TropicalDingdong 10 points 6 hours ago (7 children)

I've been saying this since Friday.

I have reason to think Florida is in play.

[–] TropicalDingdong 1 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

I'm way, way, way less worried about those states than I am MI, and WI.

MI and WI should lnt even be competitive for Trump. The speech was a good start, we're gonna need actual action to bring Muslim voters back into the fold.

The black community has rallied around Harris in a way not seen since 2008. I've got too much day job work rn, but my first pass on some data says "fuck it, shoot for Florida too". Obama won Florida twice and Trump really only won it in the margins.

But without WI and MI, it's all for naught.

[–] TropicalDingdong 4 points 18 hours ago

Bottom was just about perfect

17
submitted 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) by TropicalDingdong to c/pizza
 

Olive oil, garlic, nutmeg, Parmesan, mottz and basil.

I think I went half a cycle too long in the oven. I'm not sure the frequency of rotation but I want to get a timer in the pizza kitchen.

[–] TropicalDingdong 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Bruh I said I'm down to 6.

And can you blame me?

I mean look at them..

[–] TropicalDingdong 1 points 21 hours ago

I mean, its so fucking ridiculous to think Trump would swap out Vance.

But then.. would he?

He's crazy. And he HATES people who don't get ratings. That's like, his entire thing.

[–] TropicalDingdong 96 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Look I had to find the video and confirm I heard it right the first time.

The guys says "I'm going to fucking shoot you in the face".

He then shoots her in the face.

[–] TropicalDingdong 3 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Deal made. Mark it in the books. I should prob just send you the cash now cus that bet is DUMB and ridiculous.

But also. DAMN Vance seems like shit on stage. Trumps gonna fucking HAAAAAATE that.

 

Like, comment, share, SUBSCRIBE, and JOIN the MLH Membership Program for more engaging discussions: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvP5...

Stream NIGHT SCHOOL with Marc Lamont Hill live Monday-Friday at 9pm EST. Join Marc Lamont Hill's OFFICE HOURS live on Sundays at 9pm EST.

Stay connected with Marc Lamont Hill:

👉🏾 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nightschool...

👉🏾 X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/marclamonthill

👉🏾 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/marclamont

👉🏾 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@marclamonthill

#nightschool #officehours #mlh #marclamonthill

[–] TropicalDingdong 12 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

I have (have) had 13 cats at one time. I'm down to 6.

 

Scheduled for Jul 23, 2024 #nightschool #officehours #mlh Like, comment, share, SUBSCRIBE, and JOIN the MLH Membership Program for more engaging discussions: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvP5...

Stream NIGHT SCHOOL with Marc Lamont Hill live Monday-Friday at 9pm EST. Join Marc Lamont Hill's OFFICE HOURS live on Sundays at 9pm EST.

Stay connected with Marc Lamont Hill:

👉🏾 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nightschool...

👉🏾 X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/marclamonthill

👉🏾 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/marclamont

👉🏾 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@marclamonthill

#nightschool #officehours #mlh #marclamonthill

 

Hey there Lemon Heads! Join Don this evening at 8pm ET to hear all about the biggest news stories of today. Tonight, Don will be sitting down with the Founder, President, and CEO of ‪@KAIROSDemocracyProject‬, Michael Blake, Professor of Political Science, Dr. Chris Parker, and Founding Partner of HIT Strategies, Terrance Woodbury. The Democratic Party is quickly becoming united behind Kamala Harris. Last night, thousands showed their support at The Black Star Network's "Black Men for Harris" event. But can she win over voters that may have been leaning away from Biden? Tune in to hear all about the upcoming election, trends among voters, and the increasing support for Kamala Harris!

 

Like, comment, share, SUBSCRIBE, and JOIN the MLH Membership Program for more engaging discussions: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvP5...

Stream NIGHT SCHOOL with Marc Lamont Hill live Monday-Friday at 9pm EST. Join Marc Lamont Hill's OFFICE HOURS live on Sundays at 9pm EST.

Stay connected with Marc Lamont Hill: 👉🏾 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nightschool... 👉🏾 X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/marclamonthill 👉🏾 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/marclamont 👉🏾 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@marclamonthill

#nightschool #officehours #mlh #marclamonthill

14
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by TropicalDingdong to c/pizza
 

Hey all,

I modified my Qstove to take a pizza steel instead of engineered stone and am sharing the results here.

4
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by TropicalDingdong to c/data_vizualisations
 

This is an approach I've been using since last November to put Biden's polling in a historical context. I'm using the Gallup approval rating dataset because its the longest, deepest single source dataset where the same question "Do you approve or disapprove of the way [current president's name] is handling his job as president?". Its been going on since the 40's, but has remained extremly predictive of the next president.

Previously, I presented some results (March) in the c/Politics community where using this approach, I said that Biden had between a 5-15% of winning the election. At that time, Biden was polling higher and there was more time between now (then) and election day.

I've re-run the simulation with updated numbers and am presenting them here.

First, get the mean and standard deviation of how approval ratings for past presidents have typically changed leading up to an election based a 30 day window around the current date. I then compare them to a 30 day window at election day, and get back a distribution of shifts: the typical range over which a presidents approval might change between now and the election

Next, I calculate a mean and standard deviation of approval ratings for incumbent Presidents who win their second term. We kind-of have to stick with incumbent presidents, based on the nature of the data. There really is no way to ask the Gallup pole question of non-sitting presidents or candidates.

Using these two distributions, I take a sample from the 'shift' distribution, and add it to Biden's current polling.

I then calculate the probability this new polling value would have come from the "Incumbent presidents who won election" distribution, effectively giving us the probablity, that based on extant polling, Biden can get into an approval range not-disimilar to Presidents who won re-election. Based on this approach, I'm getting an average probability of Biden winning the election at around half a percent. This is down substantially from March, where I had him at at between 5-15% probability of winning. At that time, he was both polling better, and there was more time between March and the election for him to improve.

Using this approach, a Biden victory is currently standing at between a 5 and 6 sigma event. To put it into context, last years historic rate of ice-melting in the arctic was also a five sigma event.

Bonus figure:

The distribution of Presidential polling for sitting presidents who did not win re-election:

 

So I'm going to try and stay true to Nate's blog-post, but I see his predictions as too important to be pay-walled (especially consider how 538 basically isn't 538 any more since they don't use Nate's model). All of the figures in this post are my own and made using Nate's data and were made in R using ggplot. Just simple reproductions for the purposes of discussion. I didn't do all of them, just the big headline figures.

If you are in Dark Mode (as you should be) you may have to right click the figures and look at them in a separate tab.

Figure 1: Who is ahead in the polls.

Figure 2: Who is ahead in the polls (inset to recent weeks).

Table 1: State and national polling.

Table 2: Who is favored to win the Presidency?

Figure 3: How each candidate's chance of wining has changed.

Figure 4: Probability of Winning Presidential Election.

Keeping everything editorial out of the post. These are basic reproductions of Nate Silvers recent post using data he provided, to support having a discussion.

 
 

Key figure:

 

The federally appointed monitor tasked with overseeing the United Auto Workers, Neil Barofsky, is ratcheting up his conflict with UAW President Shawn Fain, announcing another investigation into the union leader who rose to national prominence amid the successful “Stand Up Strike” against the Big Three automakers.

Yet newly unveiled documents suggest Barofsky’s pursuit of Fain has less to do with concerns over union self-dealing and more to do with the politics of Israel-Palestine.

Barofsky was appointed in 2021 as the result of the Department of Justice-led consent decree put in place in lieu of prosecution of the union itself for rampant corruption, following prison sentences for two consecutive UAW presidents.

view more: next ›