this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
767 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19645 readers
3500 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

TikTok users reported that searches for anti-Trump content, such as "Donald Trump rigged election," returned "No results found" messages in the U.S., while the same searches worked abroad.

Users demonstrated via VPNs that the restrictions seem specific to U.S. accounts, sparking accusations of censorship and claims TikTok is becoming "Trump's propaganda arm."

Some anti-Trump hashtags also appear blocked, while pro-Trump terms remain visible.

TikTok has not commented on the issue, fueling further concerns about free speech and potential political influence over the platform.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 222 points 1 week ago (10 children)

If a full Apple modal dialog screen thanking Trump pre-emptively isn't enough to convince you TikTok is bootlicking, I don't know what to tell you.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Something that occurred to me this morning is that its a bit worse than just them sucking up to Trump with that to get unbanned; to my understanding, he's just stated he wont enforce the ban law, so if he was to change his mind, he wouldnt need congress to pass another I dont think? He'd just need to start enforcing the existing one. That means that TikTok has a strong incentive to continue sucking up to him throughout his whole term, to stay on his good side. But it goes further, because it also creates an incentive for other corporate social medias that compete with TikTok to do the same (though admittedly, their owners seem to want to anyway), in the hopes that they can convince him to enforce the ban again and remove some of their competition.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep, he's got all the big social networks under his control now, basically. Tie that to the cowardice of the mainstream media, and he's got an opportunity to manufacture consent on pretty much anything he wants. And Democrats helped him do it because they didn't want to be criticised over Gaza on tiktok.

[–] DarkFuture 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

he’s got all the big social networks under his control now, basically. Tie that to the cowardice of the mainstream media, and he’s got an opportunity to manufacture consent on pretty much anything

You just described 1930s Germany and the aggregation of Hitler's power.

It can happen anywhere. And now it's happening here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Yep, totally agree.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Suavevillain 58 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This is going to be an era where people will have to move around on social media. I hope some decent alternative can happen for people to dip out.

[–] newthrowaway20 49 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Maybe people can give up social media. I won't hold my breath though. People are fuckin addicted.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah I hate those guys. Leaving comments to each other and shit.

[–] kautau 10 points 1 week ago

closes lemmy and puts my phone away just to reopen it a minute later

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Xanthobilly 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Fark > Digg > Reddit > Lemmy….

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhatAmLemmy 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Everyone has their vices. I replaced fb with reddit over a decade ago. Never bothered with the rest of sm because it was mostly acquaintances posting boring shit and I had group chats with friends.

Now I've replaced 99% of my reddit usage with lemmy / hackernews, and lost half my friends due to the fascist propaganda sphere (anti-vaxer/sjw/trans dumb shit). It'd be really hard to abandon them entirely because I avoid most MSM (due to the overt corporate propaganda / censorship) and curating an rss feed is a-lot more effort. Dropping everything would result in becoming completely ignorant of the world.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some kid literally burned down the office of his local representative because of a 14-hour unavailability of TikTok. If that is not cold turkey brain damage then I dunno what else is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Will they actually move? I sincerely doubt it. Getting people to change their social media is impossible if they stake any amount of their identity on its use and, sadly, most users do. Frankly, I’d have a hard time leaving lemmy for that reason. Love this little garbage heap among the endless poison wastes of the modern internet.

[–] tla 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

RedNote is touted as an alternative.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess there are limited options when it is a frying pan you are jumping out of.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Aren't we on one?

[–] brucethemoose 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Except they won’t.

Don't you think it would've happened to Twitter already? And it’s certainly not happening to something "essential" like Facebook, where it’s (for instance) the only place your grandparents are on, or the only place that most people list local used stuff on.

I don't know about TikTok I guess, but it seems integral to the lives of younger people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

texting and Craigslist exist. these are just excuses they use to stay comfy and not stir the pot with their relatives or friends

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Whitehouse.gov was scrubbed yesterday too. I tried to search Biden’s protections on drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts and got the 404 not found error and redirected “home” to a video of the helicopter landing and Trump getting out on the Whitehouse lawn.

Pathetic.

[–] Doomsider 14 points 1 week ago

All that should be preserved and should be easily accessible by the public. Links for past governance should never be removed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov

Does this not work? I'm not sure to what extent it is archived.

[–] LovingHippieCat 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It would have been better for it to just have been banned and be done with it. Move on. Now, we will have the same issue we have with Twitter. People refuse to move on despite how terrible the platform is because they are addicted to it.

If it had been banned, it would have, likely, opened the door for a new social media landscape to take shape. Sure, banning isn't good, but turning into what it's becoming is, arguably, worse.

[–] brucethemoose 11 points 1 week ago

What’s more, now we know it would have been "banned" only because it wasn’t pro Trump.

[–] NateNate60 6 points 1 week ago

Twitter is not as addicting as TikTok is. Using Twitter doesn't form psychological dependence to nearly the scale that TikTok does. This is like comparing a ban against soda versus a ban against cigarettes. If soda is banned then a large number of previous soda-drinkers will just quit drinking soda. If cigarettes are banned, it's not as likely that cigarette-smokers will suddenly decide to quit as a result. Granted, nicotine is known to be one of the most chemically addicting substances to mankind, but I think the comparison is still appropriate.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My tinfoil hat is definitely in between this and Facebook/instagram doing the exact same thing at the exact same time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago
[–] xc2215x 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everywhere except Bluesky seems to be.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

Mastodon? Lemmy? Etc.

[–] CharlesDarwin 12 points 1 week ago

Gosh, imagine that.

[–] JackDark 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't have TikTok. Anyone here have it and can confirm this themselves?

[–] Maggoty 6 points 1 week ago

It's specifically the rigged election conspiracy. I have TikTok and have seen several anti Trump videos just today.

[–] Ensign_Crab 5 points 1 week ago

Can anyone trust tiktok to not share your information with the Trump administration now?

[–] DarkFuture 5 points 1 week ago

Mark my words.

TikTok will become another right wing cesspool. Just like Facebook. Just like X/Twitter.

Time to swap to another app. It's not that hard. It really isn't. We're pretty much all on Lemmy because we got tired of Reddit. Just. Swap. Apps.

[–] jaybone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why only block them in the US, allowing people outside the US or on VPNs to confirm search results exist for those terms? Why not just block them everywhere?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›