this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
271 points (97.9% liked)

News

24273 readers
4268 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Organizers of the 2017 Women’s March are planning the "People's March" on January 18, 2025, ahead of Donald Trump’s second inauguration.

Unlike the record-breaking 2017 protest with 500,000 people, this multi-issue demonstration, addressing abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, climate change, and more, expects a smaller turnout of 50,000.

Organizers acknowledge shifting political dynamics and aim to build a sustainable movement by connecting participants with advocacy organizations.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brkdncr 66 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I’m anxious to see entire cities and states ignore the dude.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

NYC - Eric Adams is straight up a trumper

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

Eric Adams is for Eric Adams. He needs a pardon because he is fucked.

[–] littlewonder 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you like hating Eric Adams, I highly recommend the Eric Adams takes/episode from the If Books Could Kill Podcast.

[–] kreskin 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

and at the same time, Eric Adams is somehow a democrat. But I'm told the party leaders didnt turn right, the Dem voters did, or some such nonsense?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He ran on the Democratic ticket, but he's by no means a democrat. The only people who like him are cops and landlords

[–] NineMileTower 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean generally the central administration of a state getting weaker is not a good sign.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In America, nation-state is different than a state. I have a tinge of a libertarian streak about me so take that as you will. Suppositionally, the idea that states have a lot of autonomy against the federal state is actually a good thing. It means that the more liberal of the states have more control of their destiny.

If you had asked me this 20 years ago I would have said the opposite, but personally, now, I’m very thankful that I don't live in a place where a state does not have a check and balance against the federation.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Doesn't that make the state just a smaller federation? What happens when a city goes against a state? How about if a neighborhood goes against a city?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, happens all the time. Tell me NYC and Albany are aligned. Tell me the people of Austin align with greater Texas. Tell me the people on Staten Island align with the rest of NYC or that the goals of Manhattan and Brooklyn are aligned.

They are bizarre things, our ape brains. We align well in small 100+ tribes…the higher the order of magnitude gets, the fewer common threads there are to keep us all together. But tribes do need safety and security, and tribes can come together to realize economies of scale, so that’s really where nation-states can thrive.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 week ago

I thought we were talking about defying laws, not alignment.

So what if NYC says they are going to follow a different law from New York State and then Staten Island says they are going to follow a different law from either.

Are you wanting some ridiculously balkanized nation where laws change drastically once you cross over an imaginary border line?

This is literally how you end up with things like women being executed for having an abortion.

[–] Brkdncr 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m concerned about the next 4 years.

[–] NineMileTower 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] YippieKyeAy 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

You can cover it up later if you get tired of it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Nothing is permanent

Maybe not, but some types of damage can take a very long time to heal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

At least for DC it was near freezing and rainy yesterday, so I suspect that significantly lowered turnout.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

well it worked so well the first time

[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Resistance to Trump was fairly successful. It's one reason his first administration was so ineffective.

It's kind of scary that people are responding so passively and pessimistically this time. We need to rally and energize if we're going to make it through the next 4 years and protect the people his administration seeks to harm.

[–] andrewta 50 points 2 weeks ago

At that time his own administration fought against him. This time round we don’t have that. We also lost house senate and the courts.

We are fucked. Enjoy the ride.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I don’t disagree with you, but things are different this time around.

  • They learned, regrouped, and have an actual plan. They’re also emboldened because they won the popular vote.
  • Trump seems unable to actually face consequences for his many wide-ranging crimes. He will never see justice. People are resigned that no matter what he does in life, punishment will never come for him. It’s easy to feel resigned when you’re up against someone like that and there’s no more hope to be had.
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If a corrupt system will not bring justice, that is all the more reason to fight the corrupt system.

I think one problem in the US is that the less reactionary part of the elites heavily played down the systemic issues of the US and pretended Trump was just a temporary hiccup instead of a symptom of a deeply corrupted system.

You can see it in Bidens leaving speach, talking about an oligarchy under Trump, completely ignorant of the long existing oligarchy in the US.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, a lot of people resisted at great personal expense, and then they see that the institutions that they 'defended' didn't do their part when they regained power.

I'm sure people will still resist Trump, but they're not going to count on the Democratic party to do their part any more.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

that is all the more reason to fight the corrupt system

Or to consider how else justice can be done.

[–] Wogi 9 points 1 week ago

Bush never faced consequences for his, nor did Nixon (arguably), Kissinger, Reagan, or W. It's been all crimes at the top for decades.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It’s kind of scary that people are responding so passively and pessimistically this time.

I'm arguably part of the problem here. The fact that he won again, and that Dems ran the 2016 playbook again, and that they have openly moved to the right on various issues since 2020, and will probably run the 2016 playbook again in 2028 even if they would deserve another vote, has really just taken the wind out of my sails.

edit the they

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

I'm fucking tired of fighting for nothing. I'm done, I'm looking for a way out

[–] TheDemonBuer 8 points 2 weeks ago

It's one reason his first administration was so ineffective.

They were ineffective because they're incompetent.

[–] Psychodelic 7 points 2 weeks ago

I love supporting protests and am quick to point out how they can shift attitudes (e.g. occupy) but I would struggle to say one positive result from the pussy hat protest. Can you help me there?

If I had to guess, I would say it helped him with his base more than hurt him or helped the opposition/our side rally support.

The protests against his abusive anti-protest tactics were a lot more successful in rallying support on our side, for example. Didn't last more than a couple months, but still

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PugJesus 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Don't worry, I was told that a second Trump administration would rejuvenate the enthusiasm of the American left-wing to oppose government tyranny

/s

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yeah, the accelerationist argument. Some Germans used that in the 1930s too. How did that work out?

[–] PugJesus 5 points 1 week ago

The same people peddling that argument, sadly, will assert, unironically, "Thalmann did nothing wrong".

There's no getting through to them. They're as blinkered and evidence-averse as the conservatives they claim to oppose.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab 2 points 1 week ago

We only got a second trump term because the center wing of the party was so disinterested in opposing it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Protesting trump will do nothing. People should be marching in the street protesting the stupidity of the people who voted for him. They will be the end of our freedoms. It's a cult!

[–] kreskin 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I plan to write a sternly worded memo on my grievances and mail it straight to a white house intern.

/s

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

I went to the March for Science and was glad I did. It was cold and rainy but everyone was having a good time. Got to hear some great speakers and geek out with other scientists. It was really encouraging to see the scientific community come together. I'm hoping we will see more of that this time around.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Damnit I wish I had known about this sooner. I’m traveling tomorrow and this is important.

[–] DrFistington 1 points 1 week ago

Wait until it's warm and he has to be in DC, then organize the march, also make it a gun show

load more comments
view more: next ›