280
They don't give a shit about harming anyone.
this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
280 points (99.3% liked)
politics
19592 readers
3246 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
In fact, they revel in it. Wallowing in the pool of poor people’s tears, ahhhhh so so good.
reduce demand for food production
...
There's another name for that.
Well, prices are so high because too many people are demanding food. Let some starve to death, boom, less demand and lower prices. Get two birds stoned at once. The second bird being MAGA reveling in other people’s suffering.
Let them eat cake.
since when do they give a fuck about the deficit?
oh, right. it's their battle cry when they're trying to hurt (the 'right') people by cutting essential services.
then they pat themselves on the back as they cut taxes for the wealthy by far more than was 'saved'.
First, the Two Santas strategy dictates, when Republicans control the White House they must spend money like a drunken Santa and cut taxes to run up the U.S. debt as far and as fast as possible.
This produces three results: it stimulates the economy thus making people think that the GOP can produce a good economy; it raises the debt dramatically; and it makes people think that Republicans are the “tax-cut Santa Clauses.”
Second, when a Democrat is in the White House, Republicans must scream about the national debt as loudly and frantically as possible, freaking out about how “our children will have to pay for it!” and “we have to cut spending to solve the crisis!” Shut down the government, crash the stock market, and damage US credibility around the world if necessary to stop Democrats from spending money.
This will force the Democrats in power to cut their own social safety net programs and even Social Security, thus shooting their welfare-of-the-American-people Santa Claus right in the face.
This is short sighted.
Hungry folks' anger knows no limits. They have nothing to lose and everything to gain.
That's where the part of declaring martial law on day 1 comes into play.
I mean, this is from the people who want to gut the benefits of individuals they trained to be killers.
And the rich are really tasty.
Empty calories though
Yeah but under the current misinformation curve the people who rely on government support the most will direct their anger at those that are trying to help them.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Wait until they find out the SNAP program (aka food stamps) is run by the Department of Agriculture because it’s about increasing demand for agricultural products, not helping the poor. For comparison, TANF (aka welfare) is under the Department of Health and Human Services.
Right, it’s not just the poor lobby that cares about snap. The farmers rely on it a a form of price support. Large landowners have better lobbyists than the poors.
It's going to be a crazy administration as they randomly wail, fight with each other, piss off their donors.
Republicans considering cutting SNAP benefits as part of ~~deficit reduction plan~~ hurting the poors
Do you want Luigis?
'cuz this is how you get Luigis.
Great idea. Take away from those that have nothing, should work out just fine.
Ah yes this is what all the invading Greenland and annexing Canada rhetoric was hiding.
load more comments
(1 replies)
People on snap barely get anything as it is. What a shitty thing to do.
SNAP pays out almost nothing already. You can't eat on $292 per month, especially if you're poor enough that you actually qualify for SNAP.
Is that amount for a family, cause I can definitely eat on $292 a month in a very expensive city. I'd need to make adjustments, but it'd easily be doable.
It's for a household of 1, in Milwaukee. I could do it here if I cooked every meal and ate meat at most twice a week.
A person poor enough to qualify for this probably doesn't have time to shop properly and cook for every meal, and probably doesn't have a full kitchen.
load more comments
(9 replies)
In Los Angeles I’m paying like $50 for a barebones, mostly produce and raw ingredients shopping trip 1-2 times per week. I’m vegan so I’m not buying milk, eggs, meat, etc. but sometimes I’ll buy processed fake meat (but those prices are insane right now too).
I’ll buy processed fake meat
If only this was subsidized like meat is. I find it absurd when I look at the prices for a lot of that stuff. Completely upside-down, especially given our health situation in this country. It makes it very difficult for people to start transitioning away from SAD, when it's funded and marketed with so much money...even if some of the substitutes are often not much more healthy than the standard carnist stuff.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Not that I suggest you do this, but in the context of eating cheap, you can get that cheaper by finding a place that sells larger bags of frozen vegetables, such as the carrot, pea, green bean, corn mixes. Go for the store brand to get that cheapest. They're just as nutritious as they get flash frozen when their nutrients are at their peak. It won't be very exiting though.
You won't have a lot of variety trying to eat on $292 a month.
Good point. I do that to an extent for the reasons you’ve listed. I thought of produce because lately I’ve been into salads and wraps.
I have no clue why others are downvoting you for this.
load more comments
(7 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Right, because THAT'S where the untold billions of dollars are going. Not the defense and weapons spending
Well, we also have billionaires in this country, when that should not even be a thing. It's time to Make America Great Again, and tax these fuckers at 92%. Like the 1950s.
Conservatives believe you have it too good and that makes you lazy. They promise to make life harder as a way of motivating you to work more.
Encourage employment? Do these people think you can somehow live off snap? It doesn't pay for rent, transportation, cooking utensils, napkins, toilet paper... Anything bit uncooked foods. If you want to cut the money needed for snap, increase minimum wage so they make enough money to pay living expenses while working.
They want you to get a 2nd job, they want you working one extra shift whenever you can.
You work three jobs? Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic that you're doing that."
To a divorced mother of three, Omaha, Nebraska, Feb. 4, 2005
- George W. Bush
He said that 20 fucking years ago, and the qons have not changed since. America, where you can work your fingers to the bone to get by, isn't that a beautiful thing?
Their dream American is a 28 year old, married with 3 children, with a car lease, and no savings in their bank account.
He wakes up at 4am each day to drive an hour and a half to start his shift at the widget company, he clocks out at 3 to pick up his kids and eats a quick meal before heading to his 2nd job at McGuffin's where he will work until 9 before heading home to sleep.
This is their ideal person, someone who can't take a single day off or have a moment to themselves without crushing financial consequences. Who must constantly be working and generating value for their employer.
load more comments
(1 replies)
My son got $150/mo for SNAP. His SSDI got raised by $75/mo so they reduced his SNAP by $75. Not sure what it is down to now after the new increase.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Wow, if they reduce egg prices any more through all those cuts they'll have to start giving them out for free!
Bruh, even the romans knew that bread and circus were all you needed to control the plebs. It's like the Republicans are asking for it.
They need higher crime rates to enable pushing for more authoritarian spending on police and enforcement.
If you starve to death because you voted for Trump, it's your own damn fault
Does anyone even believe in deficits anymore? Like even the rubiest of rubes have been watching trillions of dollars worth of weapons flow out with no debate whatsoever.
Because starving the poor has historically always worked out for the wealthy...
They want a 100% cut. Fuck the GQP
...and I'm sure all the people that suffer from this will be blaming the motherfucking DEMOCRATS if/when this comes to pass.
Well yeah, they shoulda had a majority to prevent it! It’s all their fault! /s
view more: next ›