this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
821 points (96.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36050 readers
1409 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Maybe I’m just face-blind or being dense but the photos from the scene of the crime look like a different dude than the ginning hostel check in guy. The jackets and backpacks are different. Although people can have multiple jackets and backpacks. We don’t see much of the shooters face but the eyebrows look different. Although, people can pluck/shave eyebrows. I guess the happy hostel guy would have come forward and been like “WTF?” and “I have an alibi” if it wasn’t him?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dual_sport_dork 501 points 5 days ago (15 children)

I guess the happy hostel guy would have come forward and been like “WTF?” and “I have an alibi” if it wasn’t him?

I sure as fuck wouldn't. I know enough not to come anywhere near the police if they're scrutinizing me for any reason, even if I know 100% I'm innocent and I can prove it. You absolutely cannot trust them not to just arrest you and railroad you into a bullshit conviction anyway, or plant some evidence, or decide "he had a knife" and just outright kill you. You know how they say "anything you say can be used against you?" That's because they absolutely won't use it to help you, even if you're not guilty of anything.

I am positive city hall is breathing down the NYPD's neck real hard right now. The entire department has got a lot of egg on its face for not being able to stop this guy, not being able to positively identify this guy, hell, not even know with any certainty where he went afterwards. They are under immense pressure to hang somebody -- anybody -- over this because they're looking even more like chumps than usual.

So no, a wise man would not expose himself to the cops in any way whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 175 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The cops need to present a suspect so they can say they did their job. Whether it's the right suspect is another matter.

[–] CaptainBlagbird 75 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Yep, if something like this can happen, it might not be the best idea to go to the police:

Man pressured to confess he killed his dad. His dad was alive and well [3:40]

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 107 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

And if the cops do ask and want to pursue questioning you .... you don't talk to the cops in this situation and just ask for a lawyer ... they ask what your name is - lawyer ... what is your date of birth - lawyer ... where are you from? lawyer ... lawyer, lawyer, lawyer

Never talk to the cops, especially when the cops are desperately looking for a suspect.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Don't ask. Tell them to get you your lawyer.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Fair point. I suspect that the NYPD doesn’t really want to bring him in alive.

[–] Lost_My_Mind 52 points 5 days ago (2 children)

A dead suspect checks the boxes. Can't dispute facts with evidence. Allows the media to say they got him. Gives them an easy victory.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aolley 40 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] MooseTheDog 61 points 4 days ago (3 children)

CNN and others just put the photos out without verification. No official photos have been released. CNN even said as much in their article

[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 days ago (3 children)

That's pretty fucking irresponsible

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

"Hi we're CNN. We don't really have reporters. We regurgitate random shit we find on social media. Liberal, conservative... Suck my dick we're CNN and we're always just fucking there butching reality so you stay angry and we stay relevant. Fuck you."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

"There was a shooting! Police are looking for the suspect! PICTURE OF A CLOWN WITH A GUN HONK HONK"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Boston bomber 2.0

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Waldowal 152 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Definately 7' 8" female. Asian descent. Bald. Possible Alopecia. Dwarfism.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] InternetCitizen2 191 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Have we ruled out the CEO being a crisis actor?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 5 days ago

I mean, how do we really know he didn't just push himself out of a window? 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't look like anything to me.

[–] DarkCloud 131 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Feel free to upload more pictures claiming to be him that aren't, post them to Reddit, send them to the news claiming to be from an official source.

Protect your folk heros America.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Regardless of whether the picture is correct, if you think you saw this man, no you didn’t.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 120 points 5 days ago (12 children)

Backpack & jacket type AND color are all different. The other dude even has his hood from a hoodie beneath the jacket while the first one has his hood from his jacket. Facially also completely different. I guess the NYPD has reached Reddit doxxing levels now.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

The clothing color could be due to lighting. Remember the blue black dress meme? Multiple backpacks is too easy. So that's a non-issue.

That being said. Why isn't anyone considering that maybe the cops couldn't give a shit either. But they have to try because the money people said so.

[–] Smoogs 48 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I don’t think lighting makes a light grey backpack into black. That’s a bit of a stretch. Especially considering the jacket on the left have no chest pockets. The one on the right has massive pocket flaps like they are the main character.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 days ago (2 children)

They'll happily jail an innocent person so they can avoid looking incompetent.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MITM0 48 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Reminder even facial-recognition softwares & Geo-Location data HAVE made errors that put innocent people in jail

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Everyone keeps saying look at this photo of the suspect. All I see is an image that won’t load.

Weird.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] paddirn 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I keep seeing the backpack as not matching, I don’t get how these are considered the same person, unless is going to be the next blue-black white-gold thing.

[–] bunchberry 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, the jacket is very different as well if you look at the front chest area. While people do say maybe he just changed his clothes, the problem is if he also changed his backpack, he couldn't have just put the clothes in the backpack, meaning he would've had to have left them somewhere and there would've been a trail that probably would've been found by now. It doesn't really add up for them to be the same person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Different bag. Different jacket.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Bwaz 27 points 4 days ago

Wow. Dark haired male in dark hooded jacket and back pack. Rare. I see slightly less than 30 such most days.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 5 days ago (2 children)

NYC cops are dumb as hell.

[–] Anticorp 34 points 5 days ago

~~NYC~~ cops are dumb as hell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yesman 52 points 5 days ago

These are not the same person. They fit the description, and where near the scene. Police would want to talk to both regardless.

[–] MagnyusG 73 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I was curious when I was hearing the police chatter saying the suspect was wearing a "cream-coloured" jacket, when in the assassination footage it's pretty undeniably black or a dark colour at least.

[–] AbouBenAdhem 114 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I heard he was wearing a ~~white and gold~~ blue and black coat.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast 25 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The first back pack is white. The second one is very dark white almost black. The first jacket has white buttons, the second jacket has dark white buttons almost black. The first jacket has buttons, the second one looks like a special kind of button where the buttons on one side intermesh with the buttons on the otherwise in a zigzag pattern... I bet those have a name like zigzaper or zigper, who knows.

[–] NoSpiritAnimal 21 points 5 days ago

The first one is a dark brown or green zip up with a built in hood, the second one is a green button up over a hoodie.

They're barely similar. The NYPD has too much of nothing.

It's like these:

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

Yeah the shooter had something more like a rain jacket. But he may have put on the rain jacket that he wasn't wearing earlier when going out to shoot the guy. Backpack is different, but that may have been stashed in the park.

But what seems odd to me is that this whole thing was obviously premeditated, but a guy that's intent on murder is smiling and chatting up the receptionist? I guess that's possible, but something that further suggests that it's a different dude.

We really only have the top half of the faces looking somewhat similar in a couple of grainy images. It's plausible it's the same guy, but given the information we have, it's more likely not. But we don't have all the information, so who knows?

[–] Snapz 15 points 4 days ago

Smiling guy is a patsy they'll try to hang for this to help other CEOs sleep peacefully on their second yachts at night after a long day of forcing 5 day a week return to office mandates for overworked employees with "leadership" emails sent remotely from Saint-Tropez.

Weird thing is, neither of these photos has the guy... they already know the man responsible for this and many other deaths, his name was Brian Thompson.

[–] Smoogs 8 points 4 days ago

Someone needs to paint some eyes in the pocket flaps and post it as a meme on the police website to just rub it in how fucking off they are on something so obvious.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 5 days ago (18 children)

These all look like different people with photos from different places at different times of the day. Probably their AI matched them and the coppers just had a quick glance, then put them on this panel.

Honestly, I doubt the person who shot him would actually be mad at being caught. He might've started a movement.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›