this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
338 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19143 readers
3499 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nucleative 30 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Here's how tariffs work (I import stuff from china)

  1. I find a Chinese manufacturer of widgets and negotiate with them. One of their first questions is, what incoterms do I require? I tell them EXW which makes their quotation the easiest to provide.

EXW means that once the goods are ready, I'll send my shipping agent to go get them and bring them to me in my country.

  1. I call my agent and tell them to get the goods. They ask a lot of questions about the contents of the goods and figure out which HS code to use, which is a classification of what the goods are (such as bicycle tires, or unfinished lumber, or whatever).

  2. The agent prepares an assload of documentation for my shipment. They send a truck to the Chinese warehouse, get the stuff, load it into a container, take it to a shipyard. It's loaded, boat moves to the US, boat is then unloaded, and my container is put into an inspection queue.

  3. The shipping agent forwards the documents about my container, which has not been released, to US customs. US customers decides if they want to manually inspect it or not, and then issues an invoice for the taxes. My agent calls me and says Mr. Nucleative, your customs bill is $9,845.50.

I pay them, they pay the US customs office. Customs releases my container.

  1. The truck is cleared to pick up my container and drive it to my warehouse.

  2. Now I unload and sell the goods to my customers.

Did you notice in step #4 that I paid the import tariffs? Now my cost to get the goods to my customers went way up. My margins are pretty thin, so I can't do this business unless I charge my customers more or else I'm running a charity. Now, my customers have to pay me more. That money goes straight to the US government.

Hypothetically now it's less unattractive to set up a factory in the USA, encouraging more local jobs. But damn, did you know we also need to import rubber, and metal, and machine parts, and cardboard for packaging, and all the other raw supplies either way? The local factories, if there are any, can probably not increase production to meet demand anyways, at least not in a month or two. Does anybody remember what happend when demand outstrips supply?

There is no rocket science here, just people learning from the wrong people.

[–] ikidd 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This is exactly what happens. I can pay 100% tariff on solar panels that I can't source locally at all, but we have a tariff to encourage a nonexistent industry to not flourish. And so I buy panels that China routes through SE Asia instead and add 95% extra cost to do that. So panels I sell customers are twice what they need to be and so they buy half as much and make up the difference with coal-fired electricity.

The wonderfulness that is the invisible hand...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Hey very interesting comment. I have a question: in which step do you normally pay the manufacturer in your example? Is this also handled via the agent?

[–] nucleative 8 points 16 hours ago

The factory gets paid in step #1 (many can accept direct wire transfers or have Hong Kong/Singapore/ or even New York banks). Sometimes a deposit is made to start an order and the final amount is paid to release it from the factory after inspection.

There are agents who can handle funds on your behalf and when you work with a new factory or it is a super large order, it is common to use a service that will escrow the funds until the goods have been inspected and released.

Sometimes we even have our own staff monitor the assembly and packaging inside the factory to be sure the quality of parts we ordered are actually going into each piece. This is normal every day in Chinese factories, they know the game.

[–] Maggoty 23 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

No he most likely knows. He's gaslighting the people who are watching. What's the simpler answer here? Well educated billionaire doesn't know how tariffs work, or he's lying through his teeth to protect his interests?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

He literally can't imagine anything more complex to manufacture than the Trump tat he imports already. Hats, flags and T-shirts, etc. Things that could be swapped to US manufacturer in a matter of months.

The complete supply chain for an iPhone would melt his brain.

[–] Numenor 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The rich are not better or smarter than the rest of us, and this bad breath in human form exemplifies that.

[–] Maggoty 4 points 20 hours ago

They aren't smarter but they do have access to better teachers. And Tariffs are a very simple concept.

[–] Bobmighty 3 points 21 hours ago

He knows most likely. Daddy doesn't. Even if he did at one point, his mashed potato brains forgot it.

[–] samus12345 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Eric Trump ~~demonstrates in 30 seconds he~~ doesn’t have a clue ~~how tariffs work~~

[–] FuglyDuck 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

He’s been given lots of clues. He doesn’t understand them, but he has them.

[–] samus12345 3 points 23 hours ago

You have to understand a clue before you can have it.

[–] [email protected] 120 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's hard to tell whether or not they truly don't understand, or they do, and they're just saying shit to rile up their base.

Not sure how much it matters either way, though. Consciously or not, it's still the spread of misinformation.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s hard to tell whether or not they truly don’t understand, or they do, and they’re just saying shit to rile up their base.

Not sure how much it matters either way, though. Consciously or not, it’s still the spread of misinformation.

Nailed it.

[–] candybrie 2 points 18 hours ago

Because it's pretty difficult to both truly not understand and understand the same thing.

[–] affiliate 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i'm not convinced that the trump boys actually want to stop drugs from entering the country

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

Well of course not their drugs. Same as how they don’t want to deport their undocumented housekeepers, or ban their mistresses abortions.

[–] yesman 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is something deeply ironic about the US accusing China of flooding their country with illegal drugs. The next step is for China to demand reparations to all the fentanyl producers hurt by US law enforcement activity. Then they invade, force us to take the drugs and pay the reparations. OH, and they're going to administer Hawaii for 99 years.

[–] jrs100000 6 points 23 hours ago

That would only be ironic if they did it to the UK.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch 19 points 1 day ago

Eric fails to understand who has the money to create the demand for illegal drugs. Also, a large portion of the illegal drug distribution is in the rural red counties because they lack law enforcement.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You want to cut my hair for cheap? No, I am going to stab myself in the eye with the scissors. Haha, you lose.

Seriously though, tariffs can help (as part of a bigger strategy) to develop and protect important industries. You probably want a surgical approach in applying them, though.

If any of this actually happened (unlikely), I'd expect the US to start a very long slide to irrelevance.

[–] CharlesDarwin 12 points 1 day ago

Agreed. Trade agreements probably always need updating and tuning, etc...including things like tariffs.

Having donvict do it, though? That idiot is not one I'd want to be doing surgery of any kind - on trade agreements or otherwise. He's a blustery moron.

[–] simplejack 34 points 1 day ago (4 children)

We are going to cost your countries, your economies, we're going to cost your businesses billions, hundreds of billions of dollars if you think you're going to poison Americans

They realize American manufacturers and consumers pay the tariffs, right? Not the other countries.

[–] CharlesDarwin 19 points 1 day ago

I don't think they do. But daddy donvict seems to also think that China is somehow ripping us off because "trade deficit".

So I don't think anyone in this crime family understands much of anything at all.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not sure anyone in that family understands trade at all?

Donvict seems to think a trade deficit means China is ripping us off or something. They also seem to think that China is going to be paying tariffs, for example, when it is only going to mean that Americans are going to be paying for it. Not China. Slapping tariffs on goods coming from China, etc....is JUST ANOTHER TAX.

Do any of the dumbfucks in the Bircher/teabagger/maga/qanon, (whatever the fuck the crazies are calling themselves these days, it's a constantly rotating set of labels, but it's all basically the same set of stupid beliefs driven by feels rooted in racism) really understand that a tariff is a TAX? Again, these dipshits tried to start the "Tea party", saying they were "taxed enough already" and I bet anything that only a very, very small percentage of them have made the connection. I bet most of the teabaggermaga dipshits think it's gonna "make America great" or some shit because, donvict, their great white hope, is the one doing it to them. And doing it to them hard.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's like rubbing shit on your face and telling a bully, "Okay tough guy! You want to punch me now?"

[–] ATDA 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"I must apologize for Wimp-Lo, he is an idiot. We trained him wrong... As a joke."

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning 3 points 22 hours ago

"Again with the squeaky shoes..."

[–] eran_morad 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Shit’s gonna be hilarious and tragic when a head of lettuce costs $12.99.

[–] AbidanYre 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We'll all look back longingly on Lucille's $10 banana.

[–] Archer 5 points 1 day ago

Arrested Development slowly becoming Seinfeld

[–] CharlesDarwin 10 points 1 day ago

Bet you anything the teabaggers never properly attribute it to their support for the kakistocracy, though.

These types seem to be determined to never learn a fucking thing.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't Eric the one that got rushed to the hospital because he forgot how to breathe for a while?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To this day he still hasn’t figured out the square block doesn’t fit in the triangle hole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StinkyOnions 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like moronic father. Like moronic son.

[–] KnightontheSun 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The shit apple doesn't fall far from the shit tree.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Knock off the shit talk till we're back in power, Randy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] batcheck 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shameless question. At this point I approach this entire presidency as a cash/power grab by the incumbent administration.

So from an investment perspective how would pleb like me, with my Roth and 401k, game these tariffs? Local industry might get a boost, but for the most part we (the USA) still won’t produce a lot of the goods being tariffed. So, do you just bet high on commodities and U.S reseller/retailers as the big winners 12 months into the administration? Asking for a friend that’s totally not me trying to make the best out of a potentially disastrous 4 years. Thank you,

[–] eran_morad 21 points 1 day ago
  • hold a diversified portfolio that’s heavy on cash.
  • buy equities when the market tanks.
  • sit tight and hope for the best. Don’t check your port again until the fuckwits are gone.
[–] simplejack 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A smart approach would be to slowly dial stuff up so that manufacturers had, ya know, time to build and train for complex manufacturing plants in US.

But they’re not going to do that. The plants are where they are, they would take years to move, and American consumers will pay the new import taxes in the interim.

[–] Glitterbomb 8 points 1 day ago

That's all assuming Trump and Co wont buy up these factories and industries, and then inject them with federal stimulus money to 'save america'

I'm sure in 12 months every major news station will be unhinged talking about one particular niche industry like baby diapers that is too important to let fail from these tariffs and it will be a complete coincidence that musk or kushner owns 90% of the domestic production.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kinsnik 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

does he think that drugs that are smuggled into the country will pay the tariffs?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›