this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
478 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19161 readers
5741 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I fear it starts with messing with vaccinations and we have long dead diseases come back, but then shifts to other things, like "you don't need those meds for depression because I'm not a Dr. but I know better than them and they are trying to poison you". Then they are sending people off to for profit torture "treatment" camps like the rich do for the "troubled kids" now.

In the end you have people in essentially old school psych facilities where they aren't really treated, they are just "out of the way", and when they die they put them in the mass grave out back.

[–] CitizenKong 2 points 11 hours ago

This has all happened before and will probably happen again. The German Nazis were also opposed to vaccines.

[–] [email protected] 144 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is dumb and then there is MAGA dumb. Next they will be banning women speaking to each other.

[–] A_cook_not_a_chef 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

They saw Saudi Arabia and said, "I want that."

[–] CharlesDarwin 24 points 1 day ago

The ones that will be most surprised when they come for the Republican Karens will be the Republican Karens: "Yes, YOU TOO, honey. Here is your handmaid's tale outfit....and make sure you are quiet and submit to the male in your life that is your ruler" ... they will tell the Marges and the Boeberts of the world...

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 52 points 1 day ago

Don't stop there like some middling bitch. Require that all Americans be rounded up and injected with incurable, chronic diseases.

As a display of Christ's love for us all.

[–] mwproductions 66 points 1 day ago (6 children)

What happened to "my body, my choice?" I choose to put vaccines in my body.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] expatriado 95 points 1 day ago (3 children)

he's aware the pharmaceutical lobby has deep pockets, so this is more like a ransom

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly. He will ask for 99.9% of what they make.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (12 children)

So you're saying prices will go up 99%

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well, yeah.

Gotta make profits somehow and avoid Seal Team 6 liquidating your ass on the way to the Hamptons.

[–] P1nkman 5 points 1 day ago

I'd be more wary about windows.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Vaccines are not cash cows, so they might put some cash in his pockets just to make his threat a reality

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Interestingly, "vaccine" comes from the latin vaccīnus which means "from the cow".

[–] someguy3 6 points 1 day ago

More like racketeering I believe.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So he’ll have concepts of a decision?

[–] ripcord 16 points 1 day ago

He'll announce his plan in 2 weeks.

It's always 2 weeks away.

[–] ryrybang 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hint of a major and disrupt health policy shift, not backed by any science, with a Trump-knows-shit-about-shit answer of "we'll have to look into that" two days before an election. What a fucking guy this idiot is.

[–] Boddhisatva 40 points 1 day ago

These are not hints. He means what he says. The lunatic flat out said he's going to put RFK, a rabid anti-vaxxer, in charge of the FDA.

"I'm going to let him [RFK] go wild on health. I'm going to let him go wild on food. I'm going to let him go wild on medicine."

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Americans, I have the solution. Simply declare vaccines, abortions, whatever you fancy as weapons handled by the second amendment and the hillbillies will fight for it till the end of time.

[–] _bcron_ 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd rather sprinkle a box of finishing nails on a golf course and say "oops"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] _bcron_ 5 points 1 day ago

Nah, I'd rather leave everyone in suspense

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump will say anything and do whatever he decides is in his own best interests. Every time the media reports him saying some stupid shit, he gets media coverage, which gets him more support from morons.

He'll keep spouting shit as long as it keeps getting reported and amplified.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Execs at Pfizer: "Shit, time to fire up the checkbook. That'll shut him up."

Basically the US response playbook for NKorea for the last 50yrs. Them: Does something antagonistic. Us: $hutup.

[–] billwashere 5 points 1 day ago

So this is essentially when you’re eating and the dog starts barking so you give him some food to quiet down. All you’re really doing is training the dog to bark when you eat.

[–] Rapidcreek 16 points 1 day ago

Oh boy. Black market vaccine time.

Keep talking Donnie

[–] CharlesDarwin 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I guess we don't have Presidents any more if donnie were to slither into the WH - we have a king.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

~~King~~ Dictator

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

That would be an improvement. We know how to deal with kings.

Someone find me an eviscerated priest.

[–] CitizenKong 11 points 1 day ago

Of course, only no vaccines for the rabble. They themselves would still enjoy all the newest medical treatments.

[–] Doomsider 8 points 1 day ago

It may hurt a little at first. But soon you will all be subcuming to ailments modern science had though were extinct. Just the way God intended it.

[–] rickdg 6 points 1 day ago

Abortion? States’ rights. Vaccines? Careful with that.

[–] Intergalactic 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He won’t. Big Pharma will pay him handsomely. They’ll pay him more to remove ObamaCare.

[–] BradleyUffner 2 points 1 day ago

They might figure they could make more money treating the sick than they could selling the vaccines.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

that's a double-edge for them, though. do they want more patients and more scripts being filled but perhaps at a lower, negotiated rate; or do they want fewer but cash-paying patients?

load more comments
view more: next ›