this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
623 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3402 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Barack Obama deconstructed some of Donald Trump’s playbook attacks while campaigning for Vice President Kamala Harris in Nevada on Saturday.

Speaking at a rally in Las Vegas, Obama accused the Republican presidential nominee and his running mate, Sen. JD Vance (Ohio), of leaning on scaremongering about immigration as an answer to any issue.

“If you challenge them, they’ll fall back on one answer. It does not matter what it is — housing, health care, education, paying for the bills — one answer: blame the immigrants,” he said.

“He wants you to believe that if you elect him, he will just round up whoever he wants and ship them out and all your problems will be solved,” he added.

He acknowledged that there’s a “real issue” at the border and elements of the system are “broken,” but criticized Trump’s approach.

“When I hear Donald Trump talk ... he’s very quick to say to Kamala, ‘Well, you were vice president for four years,’” he added. “Dude, you were president for four years!”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher 134 points 1 month ago

does trump even remember he was president? i doubt he can remember last week

[–] [email protected] 122 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I need Obama to start saying "bruh"

[–] captainlezbian 64 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I’m waiting for him to call someone a motherfucker

[–] Iheartcheese 14 points 1 month ago

Kamala came so close in the debate.

[–] Fedizen 10 points 1 month ago

Well next time gandalf steals his bicycle we'll hear it.

[–] aceshigh 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

When did bruh replace dude? I can’t believe dude is out of fashion :(

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

'bruh' is more incredulous, while 'dude' is more friendly

[–] rob_t_firefly 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, "dude" will still be "dude" in another 40 years while "bruh" will have faded from the lexicon and been replaced by a succession of a couple dozen other things.

[–] Zannsolo 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I rizzed so hard

And gyatt so far

But in the end

Skibidi Ohio

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ThePyroPython 90 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don't you think he looks tired.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I wish that worked for men 😡

[–] ThePyroPython 17 points 1 month ago

Keep repeating it over and over again and eventually it will.

[–] billwashere 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think my wife has said something similar. If someone said that to me I’d probably be like “yeah… I do need a long nap”.

[–] TheLowestStone 6 points 1 month ago

I've been told that. I usually am tired so it's not exactly surprising that I look that way.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wish it wasn't construed as an insult, I look tired because I'm tired. I ask if you look tired because you show signs of being tired, I'm not saying you look like shit.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There is some context that you are probably missing. This is a quote from a Dr Who episode where the Doctor uses 6 words to undermine the current prime minister’s administration.

https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/193743/how-did-the-doctor-take-harriet-jones-down-in-the-christmas-invasion

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe5OynLQbJc

IRL I think it could be an insult or showing sincere concern, depending on the situation

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Is that a Doctor Who reference?

[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m glad the Democratic establishment has Finally stopped affording him any respect.

[–] seaQueue 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They should have taken this approach 20+y ago

[–] somethingsnappy 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Branch_Ranch 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] seaQueue 7 points 1 month ago

Nixon certainly didn't help, that's when Republicans really ramped up stoking discord for political gain. Our decision to get involved and then dig ever deeper into the Vietnam shit sandwich derailed so much potential social progress.

[–] SleepyPie 73 points 1 month ago (3 children)

“He couldn’t solve the problem because deep state.”

There is no zinger, no matter how truthful, that will penetrate the average republican voter’s weaponized schizophrenia.

[–] FlyingSquid 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If he can't do anything about this deep state as president, maybe there's no reason to vote for him.

[–] PapaStevesy 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If the deep state is as deep as he says then they're the ones who made him president the first time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They've weaponized xenophobia too!

[–] billwashere 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Too? I think that’s their entire arsenal. No positive policies. Just fear mongering based on immigration.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GladiusB 5 points 1 month ago

So the deep state is still there and now you're on the list.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A president that left countless people to die to a pandemic and recommended that they inject bleach. Trump is a monster.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 17 points 1 month ago

And that was only a few of his many, many crimes in office.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

While sending vital medical equipment to his sugar daddy in Russia.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

Trump is senile

[–] Sam_Bass 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

calling something that is the very backbone building block of this nation a problem should give you all you need to know about the angry orange

[–] linearchaos 5 points 1 month ago

If Trump had his wits about him and he definitely does not, his retort would be to lie about the things that he did manage to do. He would just claim that immigration was the best it had ever been and he took care of it while he was in office and it's just slinked back since.

It's a fantastic dig from Obama unfortunately it's only going to be received well by Trump's opponents. His base is already under the impression that he did a good job.

load more comments
view more: next ›