this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
210 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19254 readers
3365 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 113 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago

Lemmy allowing you to edit any part of your post is just so good.

[–] MushuChupacabra 69 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We don't like your existence, so we're criminalizing it.

[–] grue 41 points 3 months ago

Need more slaves for the prison-industrial complex.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 months ago

Party at DeSantis's mansion!

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago

As a meta aside - please don't use amp links.

[–] ganksy 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So I guess we'll just die then¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] MajinBlayze 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That's the intended effect here.

Die or leave, either way they can pretend the problem's been solved

[–] nutsack 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] JustZ 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Would be nice to see them all organize and descend on Washington, a tent city wave vis a vis the Bonus March in 1932.

I wonder how bad homeless would need to get before major reform. Camps are going to keep popping up until they overwhelm local resources, and then disperse some, a microcosmic cycle of ruralization and urbanization, with greater and greater capacity, and more and more sophisticated systems of public services, trade, and justice, until existing institutions and policies are replaced by popular hobo demand.

What's more, increasing poverty and homelessness is a major social, economic, public wellness, and national security issue that, in addition to not going away anytime soon, is something I think most Americans find compassion for, and even demand action on, when it's face to face, people like themselves.

It's like, as the oceanliner sinks, and the 99% have to fight for a few life boats and a piece of door, while the 1% fly away on a helicopter, the 99% must realize they were always exponentially closer to being in the same boat together than any of them were to being on the helicopter.

[–] nutsack 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

homeless people would have a hard time organizing I think. from what I understand they are spending the day trying to make money and eat. this will affect where they choose to live and how far they'll travel.

[–] JustZ 1 points 2 months ago

No doubt. I've seen some organizing though. There are some homeless individuals around me who are members of regional organizations at least. They use technology and organize locally.

[–] MajinBlayze 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I hear sometimes there's buses to Martha's vineyard

[–] nutsack 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] MajinBlayze 4 points 2 months ago

Jokes aside, I'm talking about this monstrous stunt from DeSantis from a few years ago:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha%27s_Vineyard_migrant_airlift

Apparently it wasn't a bus, my bad.

[–] yesman 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Remember that movie where in the future all restaurants were Taco Bell? Well the real future, all public services are police.

[–] thesporkeffect 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even worse: the police are sponsored by/a subsidiary of Taco Bell

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Now you too can be beaten down with a delicious Chulupa Supreme^tm^

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Wielded by Chalupa Batman.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

And be ruthlessly yapped at by tiny dog with a party hat.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I think that was demolition man, where only taco bell survived the franchise wars

[–] Ultraviolet 16 points 2 months ago

"The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread."

Anatole France

[–] LustyArgonianMana 9 points 2 months ago

Squirrels are granted more freedom and dignity than humans in Florida

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

So now they have to sleep indoors. Then they are not homeless anymore. Problem solved!

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"An act of compassion on our part because you all deserve to be murdered on sight"

-normal folks with no issues

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nah, it's about further wealth transfer to the prison industrial complex. Dead people can't be sold as slaves to farmers.

[–] Maggoty 1 points 2 months ago

Well the good news is being inside it's really easy. You can be inside a sleeping bag for example.