this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
642 points (97.2% liked)

World News

39022 readers
2476 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Russian President Vladimir Putin has suffered an emabarassing setback as his feared Satan 2 nuclear arsenal failed four out of five missile tests, according to arms experts and satellite imagery from the launch site.

High-resolution satellite images of the launch pad at Russia's Plesetsk test site, where the RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile exploded, shows extensive damage.

A crater approximately 60 meters wide at the launch silo at the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in northern Russia, along with visible damage in the surrounding area that was not present in images taken earlier in the month.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Soup 120 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I’m sorry the hwhat?!

I know that a nuke would literally create a hell on earth but there’s no way you can name the fucking thing Satan and not be the bad guy.

[–] [email protected] 150 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

They didn't. They named it "Sarmat".

NATO also had reporting names for Soviet weapons. IIRC surface-to-surface missiles start with "S". A few are rather...less-than complimentary, "Satan" -- the name used for the weapon that this replaces -- probably being the most so.

This missile doesn't have the reporting name "Satan 2" for NATO, though. The only link it has with the original surface-to-surface missile with the NATO reporting name "Satan" is that it's supposed to replace it and so Western media, which very much enjoyed mentioning "Satan" wherever possible, dubbed the new missile "Satan 2". But it's not an official name with NATO or Russia, just something that the media uses for the clicks.

The original missile:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-36_%28missile%29#R-36M

The new one:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-28_Sarmat

[–] Maggoty 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No wonder the media is using Satan II. NATO hasn't given it one or is just referring to it by number. I'd do the same thing if I was reporting on it.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They gave it one. It's just not as evocative as "Satan":

 NATO reporting name: SS-X-29 or SS-X-30

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Well they couldn’t very well call it the Sexy 29.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

No you can't, because Russia can't get it up!

I'll show myself out...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sounds like a Tesla model or one of Elon's kids.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Extremely angry at my military for naming it's unlimited genocide machine "Big Evil Monster" rather than "Widdle Fuzzy Bunny Wabbit".

Almost don't even want them to use it anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Everyone said I was daft to build missile in Russia, but I built it all the same, just to show them. It blew up on the launchpad. So I built a second one. That blew up on the launchpad. So I built a third. That burned down, fell over, then blew up on the launchpad. But the fourth one stayed airborne! And that's what you're going to get lad, the stupidest named missile in all of Russia

[–] ArtVandelay 24 points 1 month ago

What, the [Iron] Curtains?

[–] A_Random_Idiot 60 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wonder how China feels having a North Korea on both sides of its country.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Meh, ij mnay ways China IS north Korea, I doubt they have issues with it.

[–] A_Random_Idiot 10 points 1 month ago

its north koreas all the way down?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who would have thought that simply robbing an entire nation and giving all the proceeds to your corrupt friends would lead to an inability to manufacture practically everything? TIL

[–] Buddahriffic 15 points 1 month ago

And I bet the ones who had an issue with corruption tended to be more competent than those who were ok with it, biasing those who sent to gulags or slipped out of open windows towards those who could compensate for the corruption.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] qisope 19 points 1 month ago

hopefully it gets towed outside the environment. before it removes the environment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ms_lane 36 points 1 month ago (31 children)

Try to copy Ukrainian missile from 58 years ago

Fail

Second greatest military in the world!

[–] bizzle 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Second greatest military in the world

I think they might be second best in Russia by now lmfao

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] LouNeko 28 points 1 month ago

Really hard to adhere to quality if money is being pocketed at every corner and then spend outside the hellhole you created.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, the what missile? I know there's already "hellfire" missiles, but proclaiming a sequel to Lucifer Morningstar seems a bit silly.

[–] Kyrgizion 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's just the NATO designation. Official name is Sarmat.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It is not the NATO reporting name, as I detail in my comment. That's associated with an older missile.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Russia used to have some of the most advanced rocket science labs and physics programs in the world.

This is a truly sorry state of affairs for a country that has been strip mined from within.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Ukraine built a lot of it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

ok slightly unrelated but the satellite pictures have an insane resolution for having been taken from, you know, space

The pics

Just imagine what the government has if that's what's available commercially to the public

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

We know from Trump's heedless shitposting that they can get the theoretical maximum resolution out of whatever aperture they have. For the US ones with the Hubble-clone mirrors that means not quite enough to recognise a face.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zombiepirate 22 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Satan 2: This time, it's personal.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Article including the satellite imagery of the site where the RS-28 Sarmat missile exploded:

https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/09/satellite-images-suggest-test-of-russian-super-weapon-failed-spectacularly/

[–] mortimer 16 points 1 month ago (11 children)

It only needs to work once.

[–] chellomere 11 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Not so sure. What if these 4/5 nukes explode on the launch pad? Even if this is in a remote area you'll cause some damage to your own country.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Etterra 16 points 1 month ago

Putin, the limpest dick in Russia.

[–] iAvicenna 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Satan 2? What is this high school missile competition?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (8 children)

is russia testing nuclear arms again?

[–] Agent641 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

US tested a Minuteman III missile out of Vandenberg earlier this year. It was not carrying a nuclear payload. It's fairly common for countries to test missiles. Some countries broadcast their intent publicly so as not to accidentally trigger a retaliatory launch. Others don't broadcast publicly, but they do communicate via the good-old-boy net for the same reason.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Thanks Satan

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

That’s one to few failed tests

load more comments
view more: next ›