this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
642 points (97.2% liked)

World News

39340 readers
3253 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Russian President Vladimir Putin has suffered an emabarassing setback as his feared Satan 2 nuclear arsenal failed four out of five missile tests, according to arms experts and satellite imagery from the launch site.

High-resolution satellite images of the launch pad at Russia's Plesetsk test site, where the RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile exploded, shows extensive damage.

A crater approximately 60 meters wide at the launch silo at the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in northern Russia, along with visible damage in the surrounding area that was not present in images taken earlier in the month.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soup 120 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I’m sorry the hwhat?!

I know that a nuke would literally create a hell on earth but there’s no way you can name the fucking thing Satan and not be the bad guy.

[–] [email protected] 150 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

They didn't. They named it "Sarmat".

NATO also had reporting names for Soviet weapons. IIRC surface-to-surface missiles start with "S". A few are rather...less-than complimentary, "Satan" -- the name used for the weapon that this replaces -- probably being the most so.

This missile doesn't have the reporting name "Satan 2" for NATO, though. The only link it has with the original surface-to-surface missile with the NATO reporting name "Satan" is that it's supposed to replace it and so Western media, which very much enjoyed mentioning "Satan" wherever possible, dubbed the new missile "Satan 2". But it's not an official name with NATO or Russia, just something that the media uses for the clicks.

The original missile:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-36_%28missile%29#R-36M

The new one:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-28_Sarmat

[–] Maggoty 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No wonder the media is using Satan II. NATO hasn't given it one or is just referring to it by number. I'd do the same thing if I was reporting on it.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They gave it one. It's just not as evocative as "Satan":

 NATO reporting name: SS-X-29 or SS-X-30

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Well they couldn’t very well call it the Sexy 29.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

No you can't, because Russia can't get it up!

I'll show myself out...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] AngryCommieKender 4 points 2 months ago

Found a Techpriest

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sounds like a Tesla model or one of Elon's kids.

[–] Maggoty 7 points 2 months ago

NATO hasn’t given it one or is just referring to it by number.

I'm not surprised the media went with Satan II.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Sounds like NATO should name it “Stupid”

But really we should name all nuclear weapons Stupid anyway.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

The Kremlin is probably happy to hear it called Satan. They're getting desperate and empty threats of global nuclear war are one of the only cards they have left.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Extremely angry at my military for naming it's unlimited genocide machine "Big Evil Monster" rather than "Widdle Fuzzy Bunny Wabbit".

Almost don't even want them to use it anymore.

[–] Soup 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can just give it a simple code. We don’t need fun names for this stuff.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We actually need the fun names. The point is that barely-educated Private Joe in the military remembers what it is and how it looks like, and does not mix it up with other things if he sees it.

It's not a nickname, it's an official reporting name.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Satan 2 literally is a nickname.

The official NATO reporting name is SS-X-29

The official Russian name is RS-28

[–] Iheartcheese 1 points 2 months ago

That's why he named it Satan 2.