this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
229 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2797 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbidanYre 145 points 3 months ago (3 children)

So their attack is based on the fact that he petted a dog that wasn't Scout when he was at the dog park?

What kind of weirdo goes to a dog park and doesn't pet every dog they see?

[–] just_another_person 73 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They tend toward unneutered pit bull mixes that shouldn’t be at a dog park in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago

Dogs instinctively recoil and begin snarling at MAGA supporters so the idea that a strange dog would willingly come up to them for pets is unthinkable.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well someone hasn't read the Bible apparently!

"Thou shall not covet thy neighbors dog." Sound familiar?

Yeah it was me, I didn't read the Bible...

:P

[–] Viking_Hippie 5 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure the Bible thing is about covering oxen.

Harder to spot under a tarp (especially if it's a sand colored one) and quick to overheat in the desert, is my guess 🤷

[–] ikidd 4 points 3 months ago

Thou shalt not have any other dogs before DOG!

[–] Boddhisatva 119 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Trump was considering South Dakota Gov. Noem for his running mate, but he ruled out that possibility after she drew so much criticism for an anecdote in her book in which she describes shooting a dog she owned.

Puppy. Not dog, puppy. It was only 14 months old when she decided to take a shotgun to it.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago

Because it got loose and attacked the neighbors chickens, not maiming the mailman, or hurting a child! And she was training it to be a hunting dog!

[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Psaki argued, "I think there's actually an important lesson here. FDR was right: If you resort to attacking a candidate's dog, you're probably losing, and you deserve all of the ridicule coming your way."

Almost everyone loves dogs. If you don't, or they frighten you, you still know that others love them. Speaking poorly about them is a stupid move. Let's gear up for stupid!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What gets me is that they didn't even have to attack his dog. Kristi already had that covered in her own backyard gravel pit!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

It's not in her back yard she lives in the gravel pit.

[–] Rapidcreek 27 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Hopefully, Walz does not own a tan suit.

[–] BertramDitore 51 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Harris wore this at the convention, and I loved it! Even if she didn’t mean anything deeper by it, I still read some snark into it.

[–] linearchaos 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There is zero chance that wasn't intentional

[–] blackbelt352 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Absolutely, there's a lot of planning that goes into events like this down to the wardrobes people on stage are gonna wear. Was it planned because Republicans lost their shit over the tan suit during the Obama administration and it was a jab at that? Maybe, probably, and it also serves as a way to more quickly identify shich day a soud bite is taken from and a bit harder for oppositional propaganda to stitch disparate quotes together to push an alternative narrative.

[–] Feathercrown 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] blackbelt352 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

At the end of the day the choice fulfills a bunch of roles, probably even beyond just the sound bite splicing challenges and poking fun at conservatives.

[–] Feathercrown 3 points 3 months ago

Every once in a while I forget that there are like hundreds of professional people whose job it is to do this stuff

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It also fits in with the wider pattern of calling the opposition out for their weirdness and pettiness. A subtle "you all remember the tan suit thing, right?" as well as bait for another unforced error.

[–] blackbelt352 1 points 3 months ago

Ooh yeah that's another good potential use case too!

[–] dohpaz42 8 points 3 months ago

Hopefully he does, and he and Kamala wear them together and are twinsies.

[–] Burninator05 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thankfully ketchup is a little too spicy for someone from Minnesota so we don't have to worry about Walz putting it on a hot dog.

[–] Glytch 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lmao as a Minnesotan born and raised I'm offended by your accurate statement.

[–] Viking_Hippie 1 points 3 months ago

NEVER BEFORE have I been so offended by something that I ONE HUNDRED PERCENT agree with

-- James Acaster on being accused of thinking that he's too good for a free banana

[–] someguy3 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

One of their recent lines of attack involves Walz's dog Scout: some MAGA Republicans have been questioning the dog's identity after seeing an October 2022 photo of Walz petting a different dog — an attack that, according to MSNBC's Jen Psaki, underscores their desperation.

[–] barsquid 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is desperate as fuck. What can we whine about next, he hugs someone who isn't a family member? Fuck off, Repubs.

[–] anon6789 13 points 3 months ago

he hugs someone who isn't a family member

[–] RadicallyBland 4 points 3 months ago

It's crazy that the worst they can come up with on him is "He gave children sanitary products" and "He pretended to have a dog".