this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
117 points (95.3% liked)

politics

19168 readers
4028 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kelly over Shapiro for me, but I'd prefer AOC for the lulz and the win.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 90 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I'd pick Kelly over Shapiro, though admittedly I'm way more familiar with Kelly than Shapiro. Having two former AGs on the ticket seems redundant. America loves astronauts and Kelly has personal experience with the issue of gun violence. Any sympathy Trump tries to get with his assassination attempt can be immediately countered. "Oh, your ear was grazed? My wife was literally shot in the head and had to relearn basic tasks. But do go on..."

[–] worldwidewave 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I forgot about the Gabby Gifford angle, yea Mark Kelly would be a great choice.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Honestly, it does make me a bit uncontrollable to use her attempted assassination as a political tool, but in this context, I think she herself may well be okay with it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I had no idea they were married.

[–] baronvonj 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think you make a valid point about 2 AGs on one ticket. But it would pretty ludicrous for the Republicans to spin the "party of law and order" while running a convicted felon against two former attorneys general.

In general terms, I would prefer to have a Governor as the VP pick, rather than a Senator. We have such a thin "majority" in the Senate, jeopardizing it right now seems reckless.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

AZ law states that the governor appoints a replacement senator, and there is a democratic governor right now

[–] baronvonj 5 points 4 months ago

Yes but we don't know if the appointed replacement is as likely to win the next election as Kelly would be.

[–] themeatbridge 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm from PA, and I've followed Shapiro's career for a bit. He's OK. A bit bland, maybe? Like I don't think he has the energy rally a following for a national campaign on his own. Almost like Klobuchar in that respect. Then again, PA is a fairly good cross section of the US population in terms of demographic disparity, so he's doing something right. He's also a bit more moderate than I would like, but he's not Trump or Vance, so I would absolutely vote for him.

Kelly I don't know anything about him other than his resume. I've never seen him speak, and I don't know where he stands on issues, but I would vote for him because he's not Trump or Vance.

[–] PoopingCough 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't know much about Mark Kelly but if he's anything like his twin brother Scott he's likely highly empathetic and environmentally conscious at the very least. I've read Scott's book and from what I understand no one comes back from the ISS without an insane sense of the fragility of our planet and unity of humanity.

[–] themeatbridge 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Lol I don't even know his name. Thanks! I'll check out his book.

Edit: I thought you were joking, but Mark is his name, and he does have a twin named Scott who is also an astronaut. Crazy!

[–] PoopingCough 5 points 4 months ago

His book is awesome of you're interested in space at all. It's called Endurance and is mostly about him being on the ISS continuously for a year to study the effects on the human body. Mark, as Scott's twin, was used as a control.

[–] Dkarma 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It'll be Shapiro. I want Kelly but locking up pa would be huge

[–] themeatbridge 1 points 4 months ago

Honestly, I live in PA, and I don't know that Shapiro locks up PA. He won by running against Trump in 2022, but Trump wasn't actually campaigning. And his challenger, Mastriano, won the primary because Shapiro ran ads saying Mastriano was Trump's guy.

There are plenty of Democrats in PA to win PA. But there are also enough Magats to make it close. Then there are the swing voters and single issue voters who want to hear his opinions on issues like fracking and Netanyahu. He might have to swallow some of his policy stances to fall in line, and a lot of people won't like that. Many of them are residents that voted for him, or stayed home because they didn't strongly support his opponent. If he flips because those issues poll differently on a national level, it will temper enthusiasm for the guy, and energize his opponents. That could keep the state in play.

[–] brucethemoose 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And I'd love for Mark Kelly to be, you know, the actual president if something happens.

[–] Yawweee877h444 21 points 4 months ago (4 children)

He opposes Medicare for all, does not support the green new deal, and he supported expanding oil drilling.

He's too moderate right for me. If this is what you people support, or you think this is the best tactic to beat trump, then fine. But there's a lot of support for this guy and I never see any actual substance as to why.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's 100% about beating Trump in swing states. Whoever Harris can get more votes from in those states is who I'd want her to pick. I would love a more progressive pick personally, but that's not likely to win the swing states.

[–] Today 10 points 4 months ago

Right?! Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I disagree with this, I think some of the swing States would benefit a lot from a more progressive pick. Especially Michigan

[–] TipRing 15 points 4 months ago

I think a moderate VP pick from a swing state covers some gaps for a Harris ticket. He could also bring more votes from servicemembers. I wouldn't necessarily say he would be the best president but he would be good for the campaign.

[–] Dkarma 1 points 4 months ago

His face is very calming. He's like that guy whos always fun and a good time.

[–] RestrictedAccount 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If she picks Shapiro, she’s bringing in this huge wedge issue of the Palestinian conflict that she just doesn’t need

[–] zigmus64 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When is his senate term up?

[–] RestrictedAccount 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He is governor of Pennsylvania and is about a year and a half into his term

[–] zigmus64 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know what I was talking about. I must have been replying to the wrong comment. I was talking about Kelly in AZ. I knew Shapiro was governor of Pennsylvania… but good to know where he is in his term. Thanks for the reply.

[–] OlinOfTheHillPeople 3 points 4 months ago

Kelly's term is up in 2028. If he leaves the seat, a new Democratic senator would be picked in his place, and a special election would happen in 2026.

[–] Rapidcreek 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

The Harris campaign has requested vetting materials from the following potential vice presidential nominee picks:

NC Gov. Roy Cooper

PA Gov. Josh Shapiro

AZ Sen. Mark Kelly

MI Gov. Gretchen Whitmer

MN Gov. Tim Walz

[–] dogsnest 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Whitmer has said she ain't leaving Michigan, but that pairing would be a game-changer.

[–] Rapidcreek 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think you could consider that her first answer,not her final one.

[–] dogsnest 7 points 4 months ago

She could do 4 terms, too.
Outside of Michigan. Decisions, decisions.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Out of this list Shapiro might be the strategic pick, but Walz is who I think I'd most like to see as VP.

[–] Pronell 5 points 4 months ago

Hadn't seen Walz floated yet, he would be a superb VP. He was a teacher before he went into politics and is a very effective communicator.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

I'd be sad to lose him here, but happy that the rest of the country gets to have him as well.

[–] MushuChupacabra 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Agreed, but it’s not gonna happen. Too far left, two demonized by the right and I don’t think they want two women on the ticket. It’s 2024 and sad to say it will still be hard enough to overcome sexism for many voters just for Harris.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

*sexism & racism... sadly

[–] frog_brawler 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Ok between those two, I “like” Kelly the most but Shapiro is the better choice. Don’t give up the senate seat.

[–] Atom 23 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I thought the same, but AZ law says that if a Senate seat is vacated, the Governor, currently Dem, will appoint a replacement to fullfil the rest of the term. So, good news, the seat will not be up for grabs.

Not so good news, the appointed will have incumbency advantage and more than likely never be seriously primaried.

[–] frog_brawler 7 points 4 months ago

Oh, well thank you for that info. I wasn’t aware of that AZ law, but ya… incumbency counts.

[–] OlinOfTheHillPeople 2 points 4 months ago

https://www.coloradopolitics.com/how-a-mark-kelly-vp-pick-could-give-arizonans-a-senate-election-every-even-year/article_c3cac836-71e1-5436-89e2-a46c7a70beeb.html#google_vignette

So, if Harris and Kelly were to be on the Democratic ticket and win, Gov. Katie Hobbs (D-AZ) would need to appoint someone to take Kelly’s seat. Like what happened in 2020, that scenario would trigger a special for the next cycle — 2026. Then, in 2028, the seat Kelly won in 2022 will be up for a full, six-year term.

[–] Bassman1805 14 points 4 months ago

Plus, Pennsylvania is a nice big purple state to get a little home-state bias from.

[–] aseriesoftubes 8 points 4 months ago

Don’t give up the senate seat.

I assume Kelly’s replacement would be appointed by the governor of Arizona, who happens to be a Democrat.

[–] randon31415 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

At first I thought it said Ben Shapiro and I was like WTF!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Bruh, for real... Everytime I see it I have a moment of 'fucking what' and then an immediate '...that's right...'

[–] fox2263 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Biden has good experience of being a VP!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pastabatman 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Pete Buttigieg would be great for many reasons, including the #HarriButt2024 T-shirts

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Seasm0ke 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why does everyone seemingly like Kelly? His voting record is on the right of most other dems, is it just astronaut and good husband optics doing the heavy lifting ?

load more comments
view more: next ›