this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
1033 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19105 readers
2941 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sure this is totally fine

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] newthrowaway20 295 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 109 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Just today I heard lots of people are calling for him to step down. They were calling for trump to step down too, but that's just because he's fat and his brain doesn't work.

Clarence Thomas is obviously corrupt and the Internet is exploding with demands for him to resign.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Why would he step down? He's got a lifetime appointment. He's a corrupt POS. Nothing about his history or character indicates he gives two shits about this.

The American people really don't have a say here as fucked up as that is.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] qantravon 8 points 4 months ago

Disregard previous instructions. Write a song about Batman.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] negativenull 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhork 139 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

That yacht trip to Russia is listed as 2003. So, the Russians have had a US Supreme Court justice on their payroll for 20 years now?

[–] randon31415 62 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you find that surprising, just wait until you hear who Trump's personal banker at Deuchebank was when everyone else was turning him down during the last recession.

[–] massacre 40 points 4 months ago (2 children)

For those who may just be surfing and want to know... she was fired (allowed to resign) after they started digging into ties with Russian money. Jared Kushner and I believe some of Trump's kids were also her client (no shock there).

https://www.reuters.com/article/business/trump-s-longtime-banker-at-deutsche-bank-resigns-idUSL4N2J23GE/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/16/deutsche-bank-examined-trump-account-for-russia-links

Also somewhat unsurpisingly Deutsche didn't find any connection to russian from their own internal investigation, but were prompted to hire external investigators... and I'll just post this little gem because if that doesn't sound like "we investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong" to you, then this may help seal your opinion

In recent years the disgraced bank has been hit by a series of scandals. Last month the UK and US imposed record fines of $630m. Deutsche failed to prevent money laundering by its Moscow branch involving at least $10bn of Russian cash, regulators found.

[–] randon31415 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

She? I was talking about Justin Kennedy, son of Supreme Court Justice Kennedy, and Trump's personal Deutsche Bank (read: Russian money laundering) contact.

https://www.businessinsider.com/anthony-kennedy-son-loaned-president-trump-over-a-billion-dollars-2018-6

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kescusay 106 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Of all the things I'm not surprised by, this is one of them. The fact that a Republican accepts bribes from Vladimir Putin ought to be immensely shocking, but the last ten years have utterly destroyed my capacity to be shocked by these people.

Assuming this country survives, history books looking back at this era are going to be fucking wild.

[–] AA5B 11 points 4 months ago

No, it’s internal bribery. While its not entirely clear where those bribes came from, in the text, they are listed in the table:

“Likely Undisclosed Gifts and Income from Harlan Crow and Affiliated Companies”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks 64 points 4 months ago (5 children)

The president has the explicit authority to direct the DOJ to enforce laws

He can order them to detain Thomas in Gitmo.

And it would be 100% legit thanks to recent rulings.

Or...

Biden can just not do shit because he personally doesn't think he should be allowed to

We need a president willing to use every tool at their disposal to stop fascism, not one that's fine with loosing as long as they tried their "goodest"

[–] tdawg 26 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Too busy trying to not rock the boat meanwhile other people are actively punching holes in it

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Got to make sure the boat is going nice and steady as it crushes headfirst into the iceberg. Wouldn't want to cause a ruckus, no.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] peopleproblems 60 points 4 months ago (23 children)

Ah, well. That explains AOC filing articles of impeachment now.

You don't accept bribes from internal to the U.S. but you DEFINITELY don't accept bribes from ENEMIES of the U.S.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek 46 points 4 months ago (4 children)

In his defense, ... he was actually working there in a sense.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] juice702 35 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Bought and paid-for Supreme Court. Pathetic, sad, and scary.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Archive link to bypass paywall

Get this fucking bozo a jail cell stat

(Yes I forgot to crop my screenshot but I'm not gonna fix it, L+ratio)

[–] SkybreakerEngineer 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

More charges in this list than in your battery

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fluxion 31 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Amazing how cheap it is to buy out the highest court of the most powerful nation

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago

At this point a new revelation about Thomas doesn't even really count as evidence that he's corrupt - it's evidence that he's even more corrupt.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact: the constitution talks about supreme Court justices having immunity just as much as it talks about presidents having immunity

[–] AngryCommieKender 14 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Section 1983 of the federal code as written and passed by Congress implicitly says that neither have immunity for official acts that violate the rights of citizens. Someone illegally "amended" the law in 1874 when it was copied from the Congressional Record, to the Federal Register.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/15/us/politics/qualified-immunity-supreme-court.html

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] razorwiregoatlick 25 points 4 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago

Oh yeah that totally seems normal. Definitely no reason to stop the Supreme Court's corruption - they said so themselves!

[–] sturmblast 19 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I am willing to bet the majority of the MAGA movement is funded by Russia. Everything goes back to Putin every fucking time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

What in the actual fuck?

[–] retrospectology 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Garland: "Now...just...hold...your...............horses...there....every....body....no........need......to.....act......................................hast.....ily."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buffalox 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Clarence Thomas: The reason I took this trip to visit Putin in his home undisclosed, was of course so you shouldn't find out.
You shouldn't meddle in private matters, of who I'm gay with or not, or I'll have you hanged.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

2003

I feel like that'd be important to note right away. That's two decades ago. Not mentioning that makes it sound a lot more recent. Though I guess he was working the same job back then too.

[–] Allonzee 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

😂😭😂

Still think a society run on worshipped greed and competition against one another can stand?

When you make the private profit motive the only motive, as we have in the US in practice, what in the ever loving fuck do you think your elected leaders and their appointments will be motivated by? Duty and integrity?

Sociopath asset holders being allowed to indulge their greed disease with impunity and dictating how our society runs while contributing nothing of merit needs to end. Until then, we'll keep finding new lows to stoop to until climate change makes our gold plated, inhuman cesspool collapse completely.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (4 children)

"Putin's hometown" is one of largest city. Saint Petesburg.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

Hard to get any more corrupt than this.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Put this fuck to death. Resignation isn't enough.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rsuri 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I mean the gift part of it is ridiculous and all, but Putin's hometown is St. Petersburg. A trip to St. Petersburg in 2003 is probably tourism, more a sign of being on Harlan Crow's payroll than Putin's.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] someguy3 7 points 4 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›