this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
987 points (98.2% liked)

US Authoritarianism

801 readers
137 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 107 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Jokes on you, they don't read the bible

[–] [email protected] 50 points 4 months ago (2 children)

"Why is Jesus always preaching liberal talking points!? And those prophets in the old testament are getting all pissed about people not taking care of the poor. That sounds like SoCiAlIsM!"

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 months ago

You joke, but this is literally happening.

[–] something_random_tho 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I stopped reading the Bible after it became woke.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snekerpimp 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

They only read song of psalms and revelations, the “exciting” parts

(edit): correction, book I meant to mention is Song of Solomon

[–] krashmo 9 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Psalms is arguably the least exciting book in the Bible. It's like reading through a hymnal. Well, it's not like that, it is that because it's literally a book of songs.

[–] snekerpimp 5 points 4 months ago

Songs of Solomon is the book I meant to put.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ameancow 61 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

SUDDENLY THE BIBLE REQUIRES TRANSLATION INTO TODAY'S CONTEXT AND TERMS HUH

These fuckers will scream the bible can't be wrong when it comes to judging others but the moment they realize Jesus asked them to do something for other people and not just scream at people who look different, now all of a suddenly, we need to define what the term "riches" mean and we have to take into account it's a 4000 year old work, etc. etc.

[–] GlendatheGayWitch 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This doesn't even touch the part shortly after this verse about a couple that lied about giving everything to the church and god opened up the earth to swallow them for bucking the socialist system.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Very_Big_Fan 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They love to cite the parts of Leviticus that condemn homosexual behavior, but suddenly when Leviticus starts telling you where to get your slaves and how cruel you should be, it's "but that's the Old Testament!! 🤓☝️"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PieMePlenty 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

My favorite story from the bible is when Jesus storms into a temple and starts whipping the living shit out of everyone as they were counting gold and their riches. Jesus was a god damn socialist hero.

[–] undergroundoverground 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

My favourite is 2 kings chapter 2 verse 22-25

From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some boys came out of the town and jeeredb at him. “Get out of here, baldy!” they said. “Get out of here, baldy!” He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the named of the Lord. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys.

God really hates children.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

From what I've read, which admittedly isn't much, he seems to hold entire families to account for the actions of their worst members.

Often that means killing/maiming/punishing children of jerks and profiteering gluttons.

[–] undergroundoverground 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

For sure and not just families. I'm sure nearly every English speaker has heard the story of Egypt and the 10 plagues.

We have to remember, its a choice they made. I mean, they're god. They can do anything right? God could've just teleported the Israelites away. He could've just made the Egyptians temporarily blind or fall asleep for a few months, keeping them alive while doing so. He could've given all the Israelites individual flaming chariots. He could've made flaming rail infrastructure and run a flaming railway service for the Israelites to leave on.

"No, I told you already. Its child murder or nothing, Moses."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fades 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The bible is a woke rag!!!!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

"Now listen, you rich people, weep and wail because of the misery that is coming on you. Your wealth has rotted, and moths have eaten your clothes. Your gold and silver are corroded. Their corrosion will testify against you and eat your flesh like fire. You have hoarded wealth in the last days. Look! The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you. The cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord Almighty. You have lived on earth in luxury and self-indulgence. You have fattened yourselves in the day of slaughter. You have condemned and murdered the innocent one, who was not opposing you."

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James%205%3A1-6&version=NIV

[–] Taohumor 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Rich people more than anything.

The ultimate reality is a lot of people die if the lower class doesn't look out for their own interests while the upper class just watches.

I think the class warfare is the only real ideological war and everyone else is 3 meals away from poverty and barely have a loaf of bread to spare.

The rich start the rest of humanity follows. Hold Oprah accountable.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And The Quran is super anti-banking. Most religions have been twisted away from their original meaning, to become tools of our oppressors.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

The Quran is not anti-banking per say. It is anti interests, anti predatory and scamming businesses and anti crime financing, which the Torah and the Bible are too. Problem is for Islamic banks it is practically impossible to participate in the global finance system without also being exposed to interest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_banking_and_finance

For Jews eventually the discourse shifted that they first allowed seeking interests from non Jews and eventually from everyone, despite the Torah being clear about it.

The sinful business practices of the time were one of the main things Jesus challenged according to the Bible, but Christianity has always been very flexible with interpreting the life and teachings of Jesus.

[–] LANIK2000 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I find it funny how depending on the parts you pick, you can assemble almost any ideology. Jesus is amazingly 2 faced. One seconds he's teaching you the importance of treating people with kindness, even your enemies, that any person can forgive another's sins and then another second he's cursing a tree for not bearing fruit out of season or telling his followers kill the people that don't want Jesus to be their king.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 10 points 4 months ago

Jesus is amazingly 2 faced.

There are four "official" gospels, seven more "unofficial" books, and somewhere north of 50 different written accounts that survive from the period.

It's helpful to read these as perspectives rather than definitives. Imagine showing up at a funeral and every attendee has his or her own story about the deceased. Just because the stories seem to contradict one another, I would not think that means the individual they're recounting was duplicitous.

[–] Veraxus 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (27 children)

The fig tree was a lesson, as Jesus was very fond of parables and "props" in his teaching. Israel is depicted in scripture as a fig tree, so the lesson was that Israel was not prepared for the arrival of the Messiah (which, as foretold, would have had no season) and would face harsh penalties as a result. The lesson was a rebuke of Israel, that through it's own self-determined nature, it had failed to do what it had been commanded.

The second one you mention is a single line from a parable (specifically, The Parable of the Minas) that you have taken out of context.

[–] LANIK2000 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If that's the intended lesson it fell flat. You're not ready for me right now? Well fuck you, I, the all mighty and mercifully curse you to never have a future again.

And granted, with the last part I'm working with the assumption that Jesus self-inserts him self in the story. After a bit of looking around online only half the people I saw thought it was a self referential story, so I guess the church you attended interpreted it differently. Honestly that's the main problem, that this shit is so cryptic nobody can agree what it actually means.

[–] Veraxus 6 points 4 months ago

That’s an understandable sentiment, honestly. I constantly remind people that we - westerners living 2000 years in the future surrounded by magical objects and an utterly alien culture - were never the audience for these stories. As a result, almost all context is lost without a background in the history, language, and culture of the time.

Very little in scripture is mysterious… but modern “Christianity” has a vested interest in obfuscating and hiding the context.

The fig tree story was a scathing rebuke that was readily understood by Jesus followers. The Parable of the Minas is about the Resurrection of the Dead (the topic that incited the story was whether the Kingdom of Heaven was coming immediately). That is, at the end of all things, all those who have died will be raised from the dead and judged. The righteous, who did God’s work and reaped dividends for him, will be rewarded… and those who rebel (actively worked against him) will be annihilated… that is, truly, finally, eternally dead.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] qooqie 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)

So they justify not being socialist according to this verse by the word believers. They don’t want to share with non-believers or even believers of other denominations (they are also non-believers since they aren’t exactly the same). So they can be non-socialist and just tithe and think it’s fine

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But tithing doesn't go to directly to people based on need. There are poor people in every denomination. They clearly don't interpret this literally.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Are we pretending that Christians actually read, understand, and follow the teachings of the Bible?

They only seem to weaponize whatever part fits their interests and ignore everything else.

They stretch whatever meaning is there to whatever they want it to say, and bludgeon people with it, verbally and legally.

I haven't read the whole thing or anything, but I'm pretty sure that there's like one passage that mentions anything remotely "gay", which, IIRC, says something to the effect of, a man should not lay with another man the way he lays with a woman. Which can mean all kinds of things, including that lesbians are cool, but men being gay isn't. That's just one way to take it. Another could be regarding jamming your dangly bits together, so docking is bad, but everything else is fine.

Then in later passages where the text pretty overtly forbids a thing (such as eating certain foods), or explicitly tells you to do something, such as help the needy, those things get completely ignored.

Modern Christianity is basically a mishmash of "fine, do whatever you want!" And cherry picking verses that should be followed, ignoring the rest.

[–] Glytch 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It's even worse; the passage you cited might be a mistranslation, it uses two different words for "man" in Hebrew and can be interpreted as "A man shall not lie with a boy as he would lie with a woman". So it forbids pedophilia not homosexuality between adults.

Edit: Christianity is a looooong game of telephone where everyone passing along the message has a different agenda.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

You know christian "communism" is a thing right? Amy Coney Barret was raised in a Catholic Commune Cult. They love this shit. They say "we want to live like Jesus's disciples," and then set up their own patriarchal fiefdoms and don't pay taxes.

Socialism isn't when sharing. This won't even work to piss off a conservative who has half a brain and they would be just as correct in refuting it. Don't get me wrong, I love me some liberation gospel, but people should really study some socialist literature, preferably Marx/Engels.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] crimsoncobalt 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)

Here's another one:

23 Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”

Matthew 19:23-24

~~The "eye of a needle" referenced here was a small opening in the city walls meant to reduce traffic for security. A camel piled up with goods would would have a difficult time passing through it.~~

For full context, check out Matthew 19:16-28: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2019&version=NIV

Edit: as others have pointed out, there isn't any good evidence about the "eye of a needle" metaphor. I heard this from my pastor at church when I was a kid and it sounds like he was mistaken. I wonder what else he got wrong...

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The evidence for the gate theory is poor. Jesus probably was referencing an actual needle when we said this

[–] crimsoncobalt 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ah, I was going by what they taught me at baptist church when I was a kid. I guess they lied to me. I'm shocked!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As a Catholic they always preached it to me as an actual needle. It was until I left the church and visited a Christian church (trying to fit with my girlfriend at the time) the pastor talked about the "gate of Jerusalem" and that it was difficult but not impossible (of course the pastor arrived in a BMW X6M to the service and was asking for the tithe). That's when I looked online for this but there is no strong evidence, and the doors called "eye of needle" are from Europe from the year ~1000CE

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

If only you would have asked him if he thought his BMW would have been able to pass through.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Additionally, its more likely that the camel is a mistranslation, since the words for "camel" and "rope" are nearly identical both in Aramaic and Greek.

[–] ameancow 11 points 4 months ago

The “eye of a needle” referenced here was a small opening in the city walls meant to reduce traffic for security. A camel piled up with goods would would have a difficult time passing through it.

I also saw that episode of 700 Club when I was a child. Old Pat there suddenly seemed real concerned that we were taking a 4000 year old work into proper context for its time on THAT issue, right?

I mean it's probably bullshit because of how convenient it is that the lines explicitly saying rich people aren't going to be as blessed are like, the ONLY works that are examined critically and turn out to mean something else entirely? Bull. Fucking. Shit.

But even if it's not a steaming pile, if you accept this interpretation, doesn't that open up the rest of the bible for complete reimagining and reinterpretation of everything written? How do we know what else is a metaphor or not? So only special 'blessed" people are supposed to translate the text correctly for us illiterate, sinful masses? I think we've been through this debate before in history.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] afraid_of_zombies 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Written decades after all eyewitnesses had died as pure propaganda. Luke/Acts was a response to Matthew v Mark war. Mark had vomited all over the James community, Matthew tried to redeem the James community a bit, Luke/Acts tries to put Pauline and James community on equal footing.

Now it's true Paul pushed for charity and tried for a semi-equality in his churches but how much he pushed or how much of that goal was "nice to have" is debatable. It's likely his letters were transcribed by slaves for example.

Basically this is a classic example of ancestor worship. With an added twist that the author was trying to win a political point or two.

[–] surewhynotlem 6 points 4 months ago

It's almost like the whole thing was made up to push people's agendas.

[–] humorlessrepost 5 points 4 months ago

Sure, but the fun part is when those conservative Christians are also inerrantists.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

They believe this, just their needs are higher than those who “don’t deserve it”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

there are two types of religious people whom i will respect.

Extremely devout Christians. (they often do more good than negative) They'll spend a lot more time reading and practicing religious texts, than yelling about gay people or whatever.

and those who are what i like to refer to as "standing" religious. They identify as religious, but it's primarily for personal reasons. They generally don't practice religion outside of their personal experience in the world.

Suburban Christians are a fucking nightmare.

load more comments
view more: next ›