764
Yahoo!blr (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by homesweethomeMrL to c/tumblr
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ObviouslyNotBanana 148 points 1 month ago

Whoever bought twitter seems to have done waaaaaay worse

[-] Diplomjodler3 71 points 1 month ago

What was the name of that guy again? He must be a real idiot.

[-] TheBat 21 points 1 month ago
[-] Viking_Hippie 13 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago
[-] Gigan 14 points 1 month ago

Did they ban porn from Twitter?!?!

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001 43 points 1 month ago

No they just made it so you can't view porn without an account.

I'm not making a shitter account for porn.

[-] dustyData 24 points 1 month ago

They are suspending users who have accounts exclusively to watch porn too, so that's not an option either.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

... Why? Surely not for advertisers

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Tonnes of nsfw tumblrs got banned and now it’s only a soft ban so a few have come back, but by and large tumble porn is dead

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana 4 points 1 month ago

I mean monetarily.

[-] Anticorp 93 points 1 month ago

Remember when Newscorp bought MySpace for $580 million dollars and then immediately wiped the user database? What in the actual fuck were they thinking? Talk about not knowing what you bought.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting 66 points 1 month ago

It's almost like far right billionaires are bad stewards of social media

[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices 8 points 1 month ago

what are you talking about? Truth Social is perfect!

[-] Gradually_Adjusting 1 points 1 month ago

In one sense. Name one corporate social media platform that doesn't wish it could be as overtly evil as them.

[-] evidences 8 points 1 month ago

I might be wrong but I think might be misremembering something, Myspace lost all it's user data but not till like 2016 which was years after news corp sold the site.

[-] Anticorp 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They didn't delete the users, but they deleted everyone's blog posts, and i think wall posts and settings too. It has been decades now, but I remember a bunch of content disappearing right after they bought it, which drove more people to check out Facebook. Then later I think they wiped the pictures from people who hadn't been active in awhile. I know at some point all of my pictures disappeared, and that's when I finally completely gave up on the site.

[-] [email protected] 85 points 1 month ago

I still wonder if they tanked it on purpose. Hanlon's razor and all that, but it's just weird how many left-leaning social media sites get bought by right-wing assholes who immediately piledrive it into the ground against all capitalistic reason.

[-] NeptuneOrbit 37 points 1 month ago

Facebook did the same with Instagram the year before. Definitely trying to manage risk by buying and/or killing all the competition.

[-] kameecoding 21 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure facebook did it with a lot of the competition

[-] whereisk 25 points 1 month ago

The decision to buy is made by numbers before the purchase: returning visitors, time spent etc. "look at how many hours of eyeballs we're buying"

The decision to kill the porn is made by social pressure after the purchase: "hey we've noticed that in your stable if brands you have some questionable materials. We can't be associated with that kind of filth, you're damaging our brand." - cc processors, advertisers etc. "my wife went on that platform we just bought and you won't believe what she found" - half the members of the board.

Most boards are collectively moronic - rarely do you have competent people that can hold serious tense discussion and can reach conclusions without either descending into massive infighting or just coast along the dominant political players.

[-] MataVatnik 10 points 1 month ago

Sounds like boards are just HOAs for rich people

[-] whereisk 6 points 1 month ago

Most are there for the kudos and cocktail parties. They really don't give a shit about how anything is going if it's not sudden unless it reflects on them personally. It can't reflect on them personally if they don't get personally involved and just coast along instead.

[-] GladiusB 18 points 1 month ago

As much as I think it could be malicious I am more inclined to believe incompetence. They saw a profitable business and thought they could improve efficiency and keep the market. Little did they account for how much the market wasn't there for their ideas.

[-] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago

And whoever made that decision made a lot of money.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

MBA parasites, probably

[-] mechoman444 41 points 1 month ago

I used tumblr back then specifically for porn. It was glorious!

Now it's just a Taylor Swift fan blog.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Heritageposts is pretty fun, but it’s hard not to think of the whole site as a sort of memorial/nostalgia collection of what it once was.

[-] feedum_sneedson 0 points 1 month ago

utterly perverted as I recall it

[-] mechoman444 4 points 1 month ago

It was. It was just people posting very specific types of porn.

One of my favorites was called imprefect10. Which was women that didn't conform to the standard definition of beauty but were amazingly hot nevertheless. It was such a subjective way to categorize certain types of people... It really emphasized the old saying beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

[-] Jackcooper 37 points 1 month ago

Reddit will follow eventually

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago
[-] kromem 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yahoo is like the Robin Hood of M&A companies.

Take from the rich (themselves) and give to the poor (overvalued startups).

They have quite the history of throwing ridiculous sums of money at companies not at all worth what they paid and ending up with worthless acquisitions.

Literally one of the investors on Shark Tank is only massively rich because Yahoo made one of the worst acquisitions in history.

They regularly took huge sums of money and threw it around like a toddler with creamed carrots.

[-] tills13 4 points 1 month ago

Are you implying that Automattic is an overvalued startup?

[-] kromem 6 points 1 month ago

I was actually referring to Broadcast.com valued at $5.7 billion.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

How are they still alive?

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

wonder how much twitter is worth now

[-] Anticorp 21 points 1 month ago
[-] Viking_Hippie 11 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

as someone who was on tumblr during the yahoo years, it was an awesome time because we basically just ruined everything so bad we caused a company to lose billions which is why i'm shocked elon hasn't realized what pissing off his users can do

[-] Etterra 4 points 1 month ago

Never underestimate the power of a brittle ego.

[-] daltotron 11 points 1 month ago

So did they just blatantly want tumblr to burn, or was it kind of a situation where they wanted to "make the platform more advertiser friendly" and then decided to make that decision without consulting their userbase or understanding the statistics of their userbases' use?

I dunno. This current model of advertisers bankrolling the infrastructure that makes up the internet isn't really working out, though, especially when most of these advertisers are super prudish, or, more likely than not, use prudishness as an easy way to basically just have iron-fisted control over these platforms. So kind of through that mechanism they can totally control the platforms that people are using.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

You're attributing too much intelligence to morons. They bought it because they saw user numbers and thought it would make them money. They shuttered porn after their advertisers demanded it, and they thought that porn wasn't a big enough part of Tumblr to sink the site.

Yahoo had no idea what they were buying, had no idea what to do with it once they had it, and so they sold it at a tremendous loss after they realized they couldn't make money off it. No malice, no shadowy conservative cabal trying to police morality, just a bunch of airhead MBAs thinking they know something about tech.

[-] daltotron 2 points 4 weeks ago

I wasn't even thinking of a shadowy conservative cabal as much as just like- "Tailor your platform to encourage more watch time! Tailor your platform to encourage it's users to be more tolerant of advertisements generally! Tailor your platform to promote more content that is related to our ads, and more easily bought out creators! If you don't, we'll pull our ads under the guide of moral policing!" kind of a thing.

But yeah it's probably more of a hanlon's razor kinda deal

[-] Furbag 10 points 1 month ago

Still a better deal than Elon buying Twitter lol

[-] mmagod 6 points 1 month ago

i didn't even know they sold it

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Thee originally sold it to Verizon, but I guess now its owned by Automattic, who owns a bunch of other companies like Beeper, Wordpress, and Gravitar

this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
764 points (99.0% liked)

tumblr

2961 readers
1861 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS