this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
563 points (96.5% liked)

AssholeDesign

7654 readers
1 users here now

This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Landless2029 69 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Shrinkflation at its finest.

[–] Dkarma 49 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, this is just the dollar store travel version and they didn't want to resize the bottle. Normal deodorant is more like 3 oz. My spray sure deodorant is 6 oz

That being said it's still a rip off

[–] Landless2029 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This makes the most sense actually.

Totally misleading due to the bottle size. I've purchased travel overpriced deodorant and it was a half stick anyway.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

But the point of a travel size isn’t the amount of product, but the size of the container. This is beyond stupid, before we even get into the unnecessary plastic waste

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I bought a 2 pack of Gel Deodorant recently before flying, put them in my carry on with whatever else I brought. TSA didn't care to check the sizes as it went through the scanner. It might not matter as much as we are told.

[–] Landless2029 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

I mean... it's not a liquid...

I always do solid deodorant. Never thought about that...

[–] rob_t_firefly 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Gel is a liquid.

Gel is a thick liquid.

Gel is a thiquid.

[–] A_Random_Idiot 5 points 8 months ago

Dayum girl you Thiquid.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Last I saw dynamite was made in gel form. Seems more pertinent than liquid in a way. I actually was going to leave them, my mother convinced me to leave their place and fly home with them. Said to myself I will just chuck them in the trash if they had a problem with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] billwashere 7 points 8 months ago

Greedflation

[–] wellee 52 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I cant decide if this is mildly infuriating or very infuriating. Wow, the fact someone thought this was a good idea. No, fill the goddamn thing. Nobody needs a quarter amount of deodorant. What a waste of packaging.

[–] Chocrates 20 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I was trying to think of an ergonomic justification, but probably they want to sell x amount of deodorant paste at $y price and to fill the thing and still charge that much would make the stick more expensive than they wanted.

Shitty, thanks capitalism.

[–] wellee 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, don't get caught in the trap of trying to defend them lol, it's a waste of time

[–] chonglibloodsport 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I hate to spoil a good consciousness raising party but it’s still useful to understand why companies do this stuff:

  • raising prices leads to more backlash than anything else

  • when costs go up, wholesale prices (per unit of product) must go up to match or the product becomes unprofitable

  • redesigning the package to fit the smaller amount of product requires very expensive retooling whereas dialing down the amount of product is basically free

You might say “why do they have to be profitable at all?” But then why would they even bother making the product if they weren’t?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lemming6969 4 points 8 months ago

You can see the design they used is the maximum the plunger will go down without changing what might be a patented shape or making the whole thing larger or the top area smaller to shrink the plunger. It's still wasteful and deceptive though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

And possibly trying not to bear the price of retooling the packaging. Was it ever sold in this packaging completely full?

[–] MeatsOfRage 12 points 8 months ago

It's known as shrinkflation. Companies want to make more money. Simply asking the customer for more money is hard because we're all well aware of the price we've been paying for something, plus they have to sit on a shelf next to a competitor who might not have raised their price. So instead most products will reduce what you get instead.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] roomboy 27 points 8 months ago (29 children)

You get 45 grams according to the package. It's more cost effective for them to just put it in the same packaging as the regular sized and just change the label rather than shut down and change the production line to accommodate the smaller size.

[–] Tagger 50 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I get that, but from an environmental point of view, this is an absolute travesty.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kadu 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And of course the fact this obviously creates the illusion there's more product and therefore can trick customers it's just a happy accident, right?

[–] Aceticon 3 points 8 months ago

Well, by a trully, utterly AMAZING coincidence....

[–] mean_bean279 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Could also be a function thing too. My travel deodorant has an amount that is 3 times smaller and it kinda sucks to hold.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

Yes they even have to consider things like accessibility for disabled. It's not all trickery. Not to say shrinkflation isn't a problem I don't want to ruin the circle jerk but not everything fits.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Concave1142 25 points 8 months ago

Looks like the amount you get from buying it at a Dollar Store. I've had a similar issue when I forgot deodorant on vacations in the past.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Real asshole design would have been to use an opaque container so you couldn't see that you were being ripped off.

[–] dinckelman 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I just got a new stick of Old Spice, and it's solid red. Wondering how much i'm getting from it now.

Update: happy to say that more than 3/4 of the tube is filled. The rest had protective plastic in it, but i’ll let it slide

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

Secret's small enough for a 3-1-1 bag but made to rip you off through shrinkflation.

[–] jenny_ball 15 points 8 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I use crystal deodorant, and I'm nearing the "end" of what I can actually use, but there's probably another 9 months worth of actual deodorant left (this stuff lasts YEARS).

There's no way to actually remove the last half of it without breaking the dispenser.

Like with yours, they put this in a clear container, so it bothers me every time I use it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I tried crystal, but even after my body got used to it I still smelled super bad. Now I've been using Native and it works well for me but it's pricey. Everyone's body is different I guess.

[–] DillyDaily 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The crystal stuff helps me to sweat less, but it did very little for the odour (which is surprising because it's the opposite of what it claims to do)

My routine now is to use the crystal, then put a drop of diluted (skin safe) tea tree oil on a cloth and rub that on my pits.

At first the tea tree oil was just to disguises the odour, but after a few weeks even if I forgot the tea tree one day the odour was much improved. My theory is that the antimicrobial properties of tea tree combined with the crystal have worked together to prevent the bacteria and yeasts that make odour worse.

I like the crystal because I have circulation issues and it causes hyperhidrosis in my peripheries, so I've been able to use it on my hands and feet too. I don't want my hands to smell like deodorant but I do want them to be less wet. It doesn't help the numbness, coldness and blue skin, but it's less embarrassing to just have zombie hands than to have soggy zombie hands.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RBWells 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The ones I see online are 73 grams in the same container. Where was this purchased? And yes of course they ought to have put it in a squatty travel sized container. But this one is not the standard amount.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

The great irony is putting it in a squatty travel sized container is probably more expensive, and doesn't save nearly as much plastic as you would think.

Having to set up an entirely new production line just to make smaller containers, or retooling your existing production, would likely incur a significant cost.

On the plastic front, the overwhelming majority of plastic in something like that deodorant is in the base, lid, and "pusher" system. Making it shorter only removes a small section of the least-plastic-dense portion of the whole thing.

They could make a smaller one, but the only real benefit would be show & portability, and it would probably come at a premium per ounce

[–] johannesvanderwhales 6 points 8 months ago

Well they are sold by weight so you know what you're getting if you pay attention.

I've switched to spray deodorant, which I'm sure hides just as much shrinkflation but seems more efficient.

load more comments
view more: next ›