this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
153 points (92.3% liked)

News

23407 readers
5197 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
153
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by MicroWave to c/news
 

The US House of Representatives is due to vote on a bill giving Chinese owner ByteDance about six months to sell that part of its business

China could use social media app TikTok to influence the 2024 US elections, the director of national intelligence, Avril Haines, has told a House of Representatives intelligence committee hearing.

Asked by Democratic Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi if China’s ruling Communist party (CCP) would use TikTok to influence the elections, Haines said “we cannot rule out that the CCP would use it”.

Lawmakers have long voiced concerns that the Chinese government could access user data or influence what people see on the app, including pushing content to stoke US political divisions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Coach 65 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Why only TikTok? Every social media company does the exact same thing.

[–] Stovetop 54 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is true. Cambridge Analytica wasn't that long ago, either.

[–] Coach 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Right? The algorithms are all designed to stoke outrage. Why don't we do something like the EU and pass legislation that applies to all social media companies, not just demonize certain ones. What am I missing here?

[–] Stovetop 12 points 8 months ago

I can only think that TikTok's status as a state-affiliated company might have something to do with it being singled out.

In practice, however, other social media platforms are controlled by capital and state actors have a lot of capital to leverage, so there's effectively no difference other than China can do for free via TikTok what Russia and the US have to pay for on any other social media platform.

[–] Viking_Hippie 11 points 8 months ago

What am I missing here?

Mountains of hypocrisy and xenophobia.

They want to be able to tell voters on the right that they "stood up to China and big tech" and voters on the left that they "stood up to social media companies perverting democracy" without going after the American companies that do the same things but pay them a lot more in legal bribes (and probably illegal ones too).

[–] MicroWave 13 points 8 months ago (3 children)

While other companies also have issues, TikTok goes further by having strong connection to the PRC:

Lawmakers have long voiced concerns that the Chinese government could access user data or influence what people see on the app, including pushing content to stoke US political divisions.

[–] Coach 15 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Oh...so it's ok if a US company pushes political division, but if it's a foreign company then it's an issue?

[–] MicroWave 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

It's more of an issue because it's a foreign company. For example, companies like Facebook (Meta) and Cambridge Analytica can be investigated and regulated by US agencies like the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). But they have no sway over TikTok's developer ByteDance because it's located outside of the US.

That's what this bill is trying to do: force ByteDance to divest.

[–] Viking_Hippie 7 points 8 months ago

companies like Facebook (Meta) and Cambridge Analytica can be investigated and regulated by US agencies like the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

They aren't, though. Because they keep legally bribing Congress to give them more or less free rein.

[–] GlitzyArmrest 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You're gunna turn into dust by the time the government regulates Meta. The only reason they care about TikTok so much is optics and the fact that a foreign company is abusing the system in the same way as the domestic social media companies. The fix isn't to divest ByteDance, the fix is to pass actual regulation with teeth that applies to domestic and foreign companies alike.

[–] nomous 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

All things being equal, yes it's worse if it's a foreign company.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yes. Literally.

[–] Viking_Hippie 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Facebook, Twitter and Google are at least as obedient to the whims of the fascist Netanyahu and Modi governments (not to mention the parts of the US government that routinely violate the rights of its own citizens and people from all other countries) as Tiktok is to the Faux-Socialist totalitarian regime of China.

[–] FlyingSquid 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't know why anyone downvoted you, you're absolutely right. All of those companies are completely beholden to foreign powers. On top of that, lawmakers are saying that as long as Bytedance officially severs itself from the PRC, they can continue existing. As if that somehow means that the PRC couldn't still use it to influence elections.

[–] Stovetop 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Minor correction: the companies are beholden to capital, a lot of which happens to be supplied by foreign powers. Facebook won't create Russian propaganda, but they'll gladly take piles of cash to host targeted misinformation from the Russian government to sway elections.

The US government seems to think that the Chinese government wouldn't likewise just pay TikTok to host the content they want anyways.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Oh lmao you weren't just posting this to make fun of the headline???

[–] fustigation769curtain 6 points 8 months ago

Because China and trade war.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

America does not want non-Americans to be successful.

[–] FlyingSquid -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My guess is that they suspect that TikTok, unlike Twitter, will not help Trump.

[–] Stovetop 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Trump has now signaled he is against banning TikTok, so I expect any attempts to do so will fail in the House after all of his followers in Congress suddenly U-turn on their earlier stance.

The MAGA crowd is likely now going to spin this as an attempt by Biden to stifle the free market and control the messaging during the election.

[–] Pretzilla 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Rachel Maddow just covered this.

Drumft came out for TikTok after meeting at Mag-a-Lardo with a billionaire TikTok investor.

He's desperate for a sugar daddy to cover his half billion bar tab.

[–] glimse 1 points 8 months ago

There is no bar tab. Trump doesn't drink.

He needs a sugar daddy to cover his half billion diaper tab.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So instead we force them to sell so that some American billionaires can use it to influence elections?

[–] fustigation769curtain 14 points 8 months ago

That is the end goal, yes.

[–] aeronmelon 17 points 8 months ago

China, Russia, North Korea, Israel, Mark Zuckerberg, Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and on and on and on... are using ALL social media (especially American social media) to influence EVERY American election for the past several years.

If it took you until now to realize that, it's way too late.

[–] fustigation769curtain 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh no. Only wealthy americans are allowed to control their elections.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Better wealthy citizens than a hostile foreign government.

[–] GlitzyArmrest 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do you think that wealthy citizens can't be bought off by hostile foreign governments? Neither is better - we need actual regulation rather than worrying about a single company.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Of course they can, like Musk. But they're still under national jurisdiction. Completely different from influence by a foreign government.

[–] notannpc 11 points 8 months ago

The same way that Russia used Twitter and meta properties to interfere in the last few elections? And the way they will inevitably do it again in this coming election?

US legislators are incompetent and blatantly dishonest about their intentions once again.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is America not doing the same globally with Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and others?

[–] gAlienLifeform 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Hell, we already know China used Facebook to do this during the last American midterms (and has purchased all sorts of data from FB), but since they have an older user base that lawmakers figure is more likely to vote than TikTok-ers it's not getting singled out for this special treatment

e; specified which midterms I was talking about

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I'm more worried about American propaganda. America is known for supporting coups in my country.

[–] HurlingDurling 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So.... Just like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Youtube? Ok

So when are those getting banned?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When the CCP takes control of them.

[–] GlitzyArmrest 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've got bad news for you, the CCP is happy to use American social media to manipulate the populous, it doesn't matter if it's US owned or not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yes they are, but it absolutely makes a difference if it's US-owned vs under the CCP.

[–] solrize 7 points 8 months ago

China could use TikTok to influence US elections, spy chief says

Also at 11: Rupert Murdoch could use Fox News the same way.

[–] Suavevillain 6 points 8 months ago

They are crying because they can't control narratives on the app.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Breaking news:

TV in America could be maliciously used to influence US elections.

BAN TV in America!!!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But first, Sports with Riley McGuffin. Riley?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

They could, certainly. What is the evidence that they actually are engaged in psyops campaigns though? This is a common belief but I haven’t seen a shred of evidence for it. If it exists, someone please share.

[–] Pretzilla 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Rachel Maddow just covered this.

Drumft came out for TikTok after meeting at Mag-a-Lardo with a billionaire TikTok investor.

He's desperate for a sugar daddy to cover his half billion bar tab.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/03/14/trump-tiktok-billionaire-donors-00146892

[–] BradleyUffner 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Seems to me that China could use pretty much ANY social media site to do this. Why the fixation on TikTok?

[–] HurlingDurling 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The US can't control it. Hell, they are planning a hostile takeover after banning it, and then they will lift the ban.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

A real spy master this one, with extremely keen sense of information technology, bravo man I'm really impressed

[–] ArdMacha -1 points 8 months ago

The way Russia used Facebook and Twitter?