nomous

You implied the person was being casually homophobic. If that's not calling someone a homophobe idk what is. At least have the nerve to own it when you say it not backpeddle.

Then why post it here?

Yours sounds like a fallacy fallacy. Pointing out a logical error doesn't mean the conclusion is inherently wrong.

Yeah if you listen to the song the devil actually played a better song IMO, it always confused me how Johnny won.

Those pans hold multiple brownies? For years I've just been eating 9x9 brownies and I'm not changing now.

So every time a fresh account vomits 3 paragraphs of obviously extremely biased, probably outright lies, and spams all over a thread we have to engage with them instead of just saying fuck off and pointing out they're a troll/shill/bot/whatever? Just so we're clear.

"I am once again asking you to share your warmth, platonically!"

I had to read it twice before it made sense. It really is ambiguously worded.

The movement we see in the right, the coalition of ultra capitalists, nationalists, and evangelicals is the death throes of the GOP as we know it if they're not successful in seizing power in the way they're trying right now.

Kamala Harris terrifies ‘flailing’ Trump to the ‘point of incoherence’.

I think Trump is already mostly incoherent and has been flailing about his whole life, the only reason nobody pointed it out is because he was born rich.

I think running against an intelligent black woman who he knows can absolutely take apart any argument he might have, terrifies him.

Oh I'll happily waste your time but it'll be on my terms.