this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
887 points (99.3% liked)

196

16509 readers
2303 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 163 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (9 children)

I knew this guy. He always wanted to suck my Schlong or f with me. Told him i ain't gay. He replied he neither, he just finds vaginas disgusting (Women in general, Vaginas just being the "most disgusting" part) and schlongs beautiful, hence it's not gay at all. He just prefers guys coz they have said dingdongs.

Told him that was somehow very gay. He got really really really pissed at me for hinting he might be gay. He hates gays and find them repulsive. It was at this point that i realized, he verbally held me hostage. How to reply to that? I didn't know.

EDIT: That wasn't a joke or satire, he was dead-serious about it. That level of cognitive dissonance is hard to find, even in religious people :-)

[–] [email protected] 54 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Ask him if looking in a mirror scares him

[–] [email protected] 39 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if he beats himself up after jerking off because he just gave some homo a handy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

I can't. We didn't recover from me somehow voicing his gayness might be a teeny bit gay.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (6 children)

The question that now comes to my mind: What is gay exactly? Is this specifically just when you like dicks? Or are also looks coming into okay here?

Are you also gay if you like people who look like women but have a penis? If yes, are you then straight if you prefer people that look like men but have a vagina?

Afaik there are also people that have both. If you fall in love with them without having ever seen their genitals, are you then still automatically gay?

Never thought about that before tbh.

[–] Leg 14 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Sexuality is a spectrum. Gay is more of a vibe than a science.

[–] hydrospanner 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Man, the more society progresses in open and honest conversations about sexuality, the more I'm sure that "spectrum" doesn't even begin to do justice to the vast, bizarre complexity of human sexuality.

It's more like...that crazy 3 tier chess they play in Star Trek.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The age old question of do the traps be, in fact, gay

To which the answer is that there is no gay, no straight, nothing makes any fucking sense, everyone is bisexual (or asexual) but also there is no bisexuality (or asexuality)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] chetradley 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This begs the question (possibly a stupid question on my part since I'm not very knowledgeable on the topic): if he had a genital preference for wangs, and a sexual preference for trans women, would he in fact be considered straight, or is there another classification for this?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Dude, i honestly don't know if a guy liking an mtf-trans with a dong is considered gay. I would prefer said mtf-trans-with-dong over a manly-man-with-vayajay. I consider myself straight. If i HAD to choose which of those only 2 alternatives would be more attractive. So I'd guess it's more the person/gender than the primary genital. But what do i know :-)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

I think it's the difference of preference for gender presentation vs preference of genitalia

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Nah, he disliked woman in general, the vagina was just the "most disgusting" part beside the tatas :-)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Skullgrid 9 points 8 months ago

here's the thing, there is a perceived idea that being gay means that you fit into "gay culture" and all the aesthetic ideas that go along with it, which is not exactly what's real (at least, this is my perception as a mostly straight ally).

So these guys think, I don't like the way the sterotype of a gay person behaves in my head. I don't belong in that group of people. Sure I want to suck a dick, but I don't want to go see a drag show or act like a woman (not my opinion here) so I'm not gay. I just want to jerk off with my buds.

that's why they had to come up with the definition of MSM. People basically think "gay? I'm not gay! I fucked Jim in the ass yesterday, but that doesn't mean I'm gay."

onion article that's kinda related to what I'm trying to express : https://www.theonion.com/gay-pride-parade-sets-mainstream-acceptance-of-gays-bac-1819566014

"My understanding was that gay people are just like everybody else–decent, hard-working people who care about their communities and have loving, committed relationships," Weber said. "But, after this terrifying spectacle, I don't want them teaching my kids or living in my neighborhood."

basically this

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Either he was a closeted gay or a closeted time traveler from Ancient Greece

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] robocall 86 points 8 months ago (11 children)

There are men that present as straight, have wives, and occasionally engage in gay sex.

[–] Dasus 103 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I believe those are called "republicans".

[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago

Ungh, perfection.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago (3 children)

This is why the term “Men who have sex with Men” or MSM was coined. Trying to study the spread of HIV/AIDS was impossible before that because these men don’t identify as gay.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] captainlezbian 31 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah bisexual men claiming to be straight isn’t new

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think Ice-T has something so say about this

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] CaptainProton 65 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Lactose curious is a thing, one of my coworkers will have dairy on special occasions and plans for the aftermath

[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Just use lactase. No reason to Plan for the aftermath

[–] hydrospanner 12 points 8 months ago

Using the beforemath to avoid the aftermath!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

And to make it relevant, just close your eyes. You can’t be sure it was a man’s penis or butt or mouth. No need for any questions about your sexuality in the morning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SchmidtGenetics 50 points 8 months ago (5 children)

A few colleagues would make drinking games of shenanigans like this.

I even know couples who have set up tinders for each other and see who can get the most matches or starters.

It may indirectly affect the other users experiences unfortunately.

[–] Ledivin 51 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] SchmidtGenetics 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Well I would assume most people using these apps knows not every match or conversation will go somewhere.

Theres also a massive difference to be upfront like the meme, and dragging it out and leading them on.

If you are just looking for likes or matches, where’s the harm in that?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (12 children)

I've ran into cis women on Grindr. My mom called them the super non-PC term "fag hags." That's the bad F word for those on Lemmy World cuz I'm pretty sure that word is censored on that instance.

[–] MooseLad 29 points 8 months ago

I'm on Lemmy World and I can see it too.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've heard that and fruit flies.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago

fruit flies

I like that one. lol

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (11 children)

Lemmy.world censors only “removed” and the N word. Lemmy.ml censors “bitch” and various slurs. I believe their users can still see comments with these words in (?), though the censored words are removed if they post them themselves

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Am I missing something? I have absolutely no idea what you guys are talking about.

Is there a slur somewhere in this post or the comment section? And TIL that Lemmy communities can censor words. I’m from blahaj.zone btw

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Lemmy instances are able to censor words; it can’t be set per community. When viewing a comment from an instance that censors some word, that word will be replaced with “removed”. This applies to both comments sent by users of that instance, and comments sent by external users.

Blahaj doesn’t censor any slurs

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Blahaj doesn’t censor any slurs

That feels like a weird sentence

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Aha, so it seems that other instances do censor external comments for their own users. It was “fag-got”.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

feddit.uk doesn't censor anything at the moment, because I accidentally broke the slur regex.

Normally, users from censored instances can still see rude words, they just get removed "in flight" if they try to post anywhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] someguy3 7 points 8 months ago
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] nifty 38 points 8 months ago

Definitely bi, or the autist in me wants to believe this man is lonely for male companionship/friendship and doesn’t know where to get it

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

Plot twist: they're bisexual

[–] Shou 6 points 8 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›